504Twistianity
Incredible
…Faith is for Fools
8
The Death of Religion
Inaccurate Accounting…
It is with considerable trepidation that we venture into the pages of the Christian New Testament once again. And yet, Shim’own’s misappropriation of the Shabuw’ah Harvest is so diabolical that it warrants additional exposure to these Satanic Verses. Known as Pentecost, the non-event is unintelligibly presented as the birth of Christianity. His speech narrating the occasion is chronicled by Luke in the Book of Acts, although he would not have been in Judea at the time.
While we will never know what Shim’own / Peter may have actually said or witnessed, it does not actually matter because Christianity is based upon Luke’s presentation. And recognizing that Luke was Paul’s lead propagandist and personal healer, we should not be surprised that the resulting speech may be as bad as Paul’s episode in the synagogue presented in the previous chapter.
Having allegedly walked alongside gospel Jesus for three years, and having been in Yaruwshalaim during Dowd’s fulfillment of Pesach, Matsah, and Bikuwrym, now all alone, the disciple thought it opportune to pilfer yet another treasure from God. And he did, nearly robbing the world of the penultimate harvest of souls.
The reason for equivocation with “nearly” regarding Peter’s attempt to misappropriate the Promise of the Shabat from the Covenant Family is because “Pentecost” has become so intertwined into Western culture depicting the 505birth of the Christian Church, the tendency is to avoid the Miqra’ like the plague it inspired. In this way, it is similar to Christmas, Good Friday, and Easter Sunday – all of which loosely parallel the Miqra’ey they convolute and corrupt.
However, foregoing the Invitation to be Called Out and Meet with God would be unwise since Shabuw’ah | the Promise of Seven Sevens plays such an enormously beneficial role in the life of the Covenant Family. Its fulfillment will occur in our immediate future – at the commencement of the Time of Israel’s Troubles, just seven years prior to Yahowah’s return with the Messiah Dowd.
As has been mentioned previously, Shabuw’ah is presented as a harvest of mature and prominent standing grain. With its all-inclusive guest list of native-born and foreigners, rich and poor, young and old, and men and women, it features a robust menu and is symbolized by two loaves of bread lifted up to God. They represent the Gowym and Yahuwdym withdrawn on this day – May 22nd, 2026. From this point forward, all hell will break loose in Israel, with the imposition of a terrorist state of Islam carved out of the heart of the nation leading directly to an invasion perhaps a thousand-fold worse than what was endured on October 7th, 2023.
Turning the clock back two thousand years, we note that the Book of Acts, like the Gospel of Luke, was a work of fiction – far more wrong than right. Neither book was inspired by God. However, since they are considered “Scripture” by billions, the narratives they contain, which were scribed circa 75 CE, are seldom scrutinized as we are doing. And that is a shame because it becomes immediately obvious to an informed and rational reader that they were agenda-driven and, more specifically, heavily influenced by Sha’uwl’s / Paul’s jaundiced perception of Jews.
This becomes readily apparent the deeper we dive into 506either the Book of Acts or the Gospel of Luke because both are riddled with inaccuracies, fallacies, and, worse, anti-Semitism. With this in mind, the second chapter of Acts begins...
“Indeed (kai), on (en) the Day (hemera) of Fifty (Pentekoste – feminine form of pentekonta, meaning fifty), it was fulfilled (sumpleroo – was fully completed). It came to exist (eimi) that all were assembled in harmony (pas homou – everyone was like-minded, like-natured, and unified in an assembly) in the presence of (epi) it (auto).” (Acts 2:1)
I may be the first to share the bad news. This is a grossly inaccurate portrayal of Shabuw’ah. God has actually invited everyone to attend the annual party. Therefore, it is Yahowah’s intent that those gathered on Shabuw’ah be exceedingly diverse in their life situations, ethnicities, gender, age, perspectives, attitudes, and thinking. The reason that the Promise of the Shabat was depicted this way in the Towrah was because it is the Miqra’ where Yahowah wanted everyone to hear His message and experience His passion for life. Done correctly, the attendees would not be like-minded, similarly devoted, or harmonious.
This known, those who will eventually benefit from the Mow’ed when the souls representing the standing and mature grain are reaped seven years before the Messiah’s return, will have accepted the conditions of the Covenant and will have capitalized on the benefits of the previous three Miqra’ey. Therefore, while the Shabuw’ah | Promise of the Shabat and the Vow of Seven Sevens has not yet been fulfilled, neither the annual celebrations nor the eventual harvest will play out as Peter was describing.
When the foretold event transpires on May 22nd, 2026 as the sun sets on a Shabat, the moment the Time of Israel’s Troubles intensifies prior to Yahowah’s return with Dowd, 507there will be no Christians participating among the one-in-a-million Covenant members who are withdrawn.
Peter’s perverse ploy is particularly pathetic. He is pretending to benefit from, orchestrate, and explain Shabuw’ah without even mentioning Pesach, Matsah, and Bikuwrym which are prerequisites. Shabuw’ah is one of seven Mow’edym, and the other six play no role in the upstart religion. It is irrational to claim Seven Sevens for a faith at war with the Towrah since that is the only place the meaning and purpose of the Promise of the Shabat are depicted. As a result, to disingenuously pilfer the middle Miqra’ and ignorantly and incorrectly describe it, while claiming it as a spiritual awakening, is appalling. But apparently not to Christians who celebrate Pentecost to this day as if announcing the birth of their god-forsaken church.
“And immediately (aphno) there came into existence (ginomai) out of (ek) heaven (ouranos) the sound of information and news (echos – of a spoken report), like (hosper – corresponding to) a compelling force (biaias – a powerful source of energy), moving inwardly and upholding (pheromai) the breath of spiritual life (pnoe – feminine derivative of pneuma Spirit), and filling (pleroo – supplying) the whole (holos) household (oikon) where (ou) they were residing.” (Acts 2:2)
No, exactly the opposite. Rather than news from heaven arriving at this moment, all of those who are properly informed about heaven will be departing. The Ruwach Qodesh | Set Apart Spirit of Yahowah is withdrawn from the Earth on Shabuw’ah. Therefore, the only spiritual life which will remain will be decidedly demonic. And while only one Family will be involved in the harvest, the children will come from homes all around the world.
I have had the opportunity to spend the past twenty-508three years of my life aided by the Ruwach Qodesh. As we will discover when we consider Yahowah’s prophets, particularly Dowd, Solomon, and Yasha’yah, God had a great deal to say concerning the words you are reading and how they would be used to influence His people. And from those words and this experience, I can say without equivocation that this is not how the Set-Apart Spirit operates in our lives. She does not speak externally, but instead internally. She does not narrate the Word of God or communicate independently but, instead, enlightens us regarding it. She is inspiring, not compelling. And the Spirit does not make a racket. When She comes upon us, there is no audible sound.
“And languages (glossa – the various dialects of human speech) became apparent to them (horao – they came to know and understand them), like a fire burning (pyros) in them. And they were distributed (diamerizo – dispersed), conferred, and appointed (kathizo) upon (epi) each one (hekastos) of them (autos).
And they were all individually (pas) filled with (pimplamai) the Holy (hagion – gender neuter of hagios) Spirit (ΠΝΣ – placeholder for pneuma), and began (archomai) to speak (laleo) other (heteros – different) languages (glossa – dialects), just as (kathos) the Spirit (ΠΝΑ) gave (didomi) them the ability to convey the spoken words (apophtheggomai – the ability to pronounce words).” (Acts 2:3-4)
Wrong again. Shabuw’ah will be fulfilled as an ingathering of saved souls. It is not a language supermarket or a universal translator implant. It is about a withdrawal, not a distribution. There will be no fires. Nothing is conferred. The Set-Apart Spirit is being removed as She removes Her Children. No one known to Yah will be addressing earthlings. The time for spoken words in association with God is now over – and it will remain so for three and a half years. And that is when the two 509Witnesses will return.
Therefore, up to this point, just four verses into his narration of the non-event, Shim’own / Peter has managed to get everything wrong.
The Mow’edym | Enduring Testimony Regarding the Restoring Witnesses denote Appointments which are Miqra’ey | Invitations to be Called Out and Meet with Yahowah. They provide the only way for people to understand what the Towrah Teaches regarding reconciliation and benefit from its Beryth | Covenant. The first three, Pesach, Matsah, and Bikuwrym, were fulfilled by the Messiah Dowd in year 4000 Yah / 33 CE. The final three, Taruw’ah, Kipurym, and Sukah will be fulfilled by our King in year 6000 Yah / 2033. The Shabuw’ah Harvest is set between these dates, transpiring seven years prior to Dowd’s return and at the commencement of the Time of Israel’s Troubles – on the Shabat of May 22nd, 2026.
Since all of this was presented to us through Yahowah’s prophets in Hebrew, accurate translations accompanied by appropriately decerned insights are helpful prior to and after fulfillment. In fact, the Yada Yahowah legacy of 33 books, a rich reservoir of resources, and a wide array of videos and audio programs may be all that is left between the Shabuw’ah Harvest and the Passover return of the two Witnesses in 2030.
This is why the Yada Yahowah Series exists. We recognize the value of rendering the testimony Yahowah conveyed in Hebrew into the language spoken by the most people. English has become the most universal language worldwide – especially among Jews.
As a useful insight into understanding this place and time, most literate individuals would have been bilingual. In addition to Hebrew, they would have been reasonably fluent in Aramaic, Greek, and Latin due to the influence of the Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, Greeks, and 510Romans.
If it were not for the popularity of the Pentecostal movement, where “speaking in tongues” is interpreted to be “praising God in a heavenly language,” I would not be required to state the obvious. This presentation states that those affected by Peter’s spirit were allegedly equipped to speak human languages, not God’s. The language spoken in heaven is Hebrew, rendering the notion of “speaking in the tongues of angels” by muttering incomprehensible gibberish – as nonsensical as the sounds, themselves. What’s more, Pentecostals act like they are out of their minds, often posing as if the poster children for: This is Your Brain on Religion.
The reason for the “likes of a burning fire within them” was to replace the experience of Moseh and the Children of Yisra’el around Choreb when the Towrah was being revealed. These “Christians” were said to have experienced their own fire, and thus their own god, divine light, spiritual voice, and New Testament to replace all that antiquated stuff and folks from long ago.
The claim here is that this spirit, rather than enlightening anyone, equipped them to become bilingual. And while there is no evidence of this, what follows is yet another lie. It was scribed by Luke on Paul’s behalf to besmirch Jews. For his new religion to prevail, Yahuwdym would have to be swept off center stage and replaced by the Gentile Church. Replacement Foolology had multiple authors.
“And now (de) existing (eimi) inside (eis) Yaruwshalaim (Ierousalem – Jerusalem), resided (katoikeo) Yahuwdym (Ioudaios – Jews), overtly pious (eulabes) men (andros) from (apo) every (pas) ethnicity (ethnos – race) under (hypo) heaven (ouranos).
And so now when (de) this (houtos) voice (phone) came to exist (ginomai) in large assemblies of people 511(plethos), they were confused (sygcheo), because (hoti) each and every one (hekastos heis) heard (akouo) what was spoken (laleo) in his (autos) own (idios) language (dialektos).” (Acts 2:5-6)
As is the case with so much of the Christian New Testament, the writer’s attempts to paint Jews as hypocrites, overtly pious, and thus conniving and undeserving, is pathetic. And it is dishonest to claim that Yahuwdym | Jews, who are a unique ethnicity, represent “every race under heaven.” This overture defines Gowym | Gentiles. Therefore, the writing quality is as deficient as the message.
This amalgamation of Jews into one monolithic perception was not a simple mistake, but instead sinister and deliberate. Peter and Paul, like Muhammad and Allah after him, wanted God’s Chosen People tarred with the same brush. The reason for this is that the Jews, unlike the Gentiles, knew that they were lying because they were constantly misappropriating and misquoting their Towrah wa Naby’ to establish their credibility. Having rejected both Peter and then Paul, the Jews had to be silenced and discredited for either of these infamous men to be believed.
Beyond silencing Yahuwdym, for the Christian instigators to be perceived as plausible, their followers would have to become the recipients of the promises made to God’s people – the Yisra’elites. And for that to occur, they would both have to concoct schemes by which God not only rejected His people but was compelled to replace them with others. They accomplished this by slandering Jews – attributing all manner of lies to them, doing so in a way that the entire race would be despised.
The first strokes toward that end appear in Paul’s fourteen epistles. The next are here in Acts, followed in chronological order by the slanderous and sour notes in Mark, Luke, and Matthew.
512Keeping it real, it would have been impossible for there to have been a gathering representing every race on earth in this place at this time. Further, people are confused by languages they do not speak, and not by their native tongue. Yes, I am pointing out the obvious, and yet, without someone having done so, billions have been misled by this errant assessment for nearly a score of centuries.
You may have also noticed that the scene changed abruptly from a room of coconspirators within a single home to a widespread phenomenon expressed throughout an entire city. That could never have occurred within the Covenant because participation is the result of a deliberate, uniquely personal, and sequential process.
Peter, however, was clueless regarding the Towrah. His mission was to promote his new religion based upon faith and spirituality. That is why his unGodly message, in his language, with the people he claimed as his own, was being born by way of his indwelling spirit during the recasting of Shabuw’ah as Pentecost.
Fortunately for us, we do not live under the influence of Peter’s or Paul’s Roman Catholic Church. Given the opportunity, they would have tortured us to death as a deterrent to keep me from sharing and you and others from reading the truth. And yet, sadly today, they are tormenting little children instead.
It is bewildering that so many believe that this irrational rant was inspired by God. Even worse than inferring that god is a nincompoop by attributing this verbal diarrhea to him, Christians somehow think that their capricious deity withdrew the countless promises he had made to Yisra’el and transferred them to Gowym. Not only would that have made their god a liar and an anti-Semite, like themselves, he would have become untrustworthy – giving ever more credence to the realization that religious gods are made in man’s image. And in reality, the Romans 513who controlled Judea and who evolved into the Roman Catholic Church, were far worse than the Jews. Throughout the history of the religion, that would never change.
Continuing to slander the Chosen People on behalf of the worst of people, we read…
“And (kai) besides (de), they were out of their minds (existemi), and they were surprised (thaumazo), saying (lego), ‘Look (idou), are not (ou) the entirety (hapas – the whole and all) of them who are (eimi) speaking (laleo) Galileans (Galilaios)?’” (Acts 2:7)
Pointing out the obvious again, the coconspirators gathered on this day were entirely Jewish – as were each of the celebrants, thereby rendering this entire diatribe absurd. Galilee was used as a pejorative because it was a swampy, mosquito-infested lowland, beneath Jerusalem in status and elevation. It was inserted to make the Jews appear like snobs.
This dialogue demonstrates the inherent fraud associated with the Christian New Testament. At the very earliest, Acts was written three decades after the fulfillment of Pesach and Matsah by Dowd – well beyond the time a specific conversation could have been accurately recalled. Luke, its author, was not an eyewitness to any of these events – making his account hearsay.
“Pious Jews” would have spoken Hebrew, not Greek. Further, the Roman legions which occupied Yaruwshalaim were comprised of conscripts and slaves from throughout the Empire. Under such circumstances, the sound of a foreign language would not have driven anyone crazy.
Much of the Christian New Testament was written to include awkward and unattested conversations. Not only were they contrived, they were projected upon the entire population – all to condemn the Jewish people. That way, the Christians could not only claim superiority, they would 514have a common enemy and a ready excuse for their horrid behavior.
“Somehow (pos), each and every one (hekastos) hears them speak (akouo) in the distinct (idios – individual and unique) language and dialect (dialektos) of their birth (gennnao): Parthians, Medes, Elamites, and those who live in Mesopotamia, Yahuwdah (Ioudaia), Cappadocia, Pontus, and Asia, Phrygia, Pamphylia, Egypt (Aigyptos), parts of Libya toward Cyrene, and visitors from Rome (Rhomaios), not only Yahuwdym (Ioudaios – Jews) and newcomers (proselutos – visitors from other nations), Cretans and Arabs (Araps), listening to (akouo – receiving the news and hearing) them speak (laleo – talk) in their own tongue (glossa – language and dialect) the magnificent things and powerful works (megaleios – the great deeds and miracles) of the God (ΘΥ – placeholder for theou).” (Acts 2:8-11)
While it would have been impossible, even for a multilingual eyewitness to know if this had occurred, the overall point is implausible, especially with the pretense of authenticity inherent in the details. Among the most glaring issues, the Romans were not “visitors” and Yahuwdym were listed twice while their language was not mentioned even once. Those from Mesopotamia would have spoken Aramaic, a language which was very similar to Hebrew, making “Parthians, Medes, and Elamites” verbose, while the absence of the Persians was a significant slight. Arabs speak a corrupted form of Hebrew. Similarly, insignificant places like “Cappadocia, Pontus, Phrygia, Pamphylia, and Cyrene” were listed, while the people responsible for the lingua franca of this region – the Greeks – were not.
Had this been written: “the disciples, in addition to their native Hebrew, now spoke Greek, Latin, and Aramaic,” it would have been reasonable but not revealing since it was commonplace. One would have been hard-pressed to find anyone in Yaruwshalaim who was not 515conversant in one or more of these languages.
In this passage, the Greek word, proselutos, is transliterated in most English Bibles as “proselytes.” Then, those who aided and abetted this misleading transliteration erroneously defined that word as “converts to Judaism” and thereby misconstrued Yahowah’s intent. This day would mark neither the birth of the Church nor the transition from Judaism to Christianity as Catholics and Protestants profess. It is a harvest of the Covenant Family prior to the Time of Troubles. No one will be lingering around to chitchat with anyone. Equally relevant, Jews did not, and do not, proselytize. Peter’s and Paul’s rants against “Judaizers” were delusional.
The beneficiaries of Passover and UnYeasted Bread, as few as they may have been, would have been included in Yahowah’s Covenant Family during Firstborn Children. But nothing happened during Seven Sevens 1,991 years ago. The celebration of Shabuw’ah is two years in our future as of this writing in 2024.
Consistent with the variety of invitees during Shabuw’ah, Yahowah’s family is inclusive of people from different races and places. Everyone is welcome to attend. And all who benefit arrive the same way – by embracing the Covenant and observing its Invitations to Meet with God.
The Miqra’ of Chamisym / Invitation to be Called Out and Meet of Fifty as it is also known, is qodesh | set apart, a special day for us to reveal the magnificent work performed by Yahowah in concert with the Set-Apart Spirit. It is an annual party where those who are related to Yah invite their friends to celebrate the good news – a path home has been laid out at great cost, its toll paid by God’s beloved Son, Dowd, so that we might journey free of encumbrances. This harvest is a homecoming, an exodus from man’s perversions to Yah’s brilliance.
516The Feast of Seven Sevens follows Firstborn Children on the annual calendar by seven weeks. The pattern is seven Shabats plus one day after the special Shabat observance of UnYeasted Bread – the most essential day on the road to our redemption. As we have discovered, this opportunity to be Called Out and Meet on Shabuw’ah is a harvest of standing grain – which is symbolic of those who are standing alongside Yahowah, ready and willing to speak to His people on His behalf. Attendance is open to all people, free and slave, Yahuwdym and Gowym, men and women, young and old, no matter how common or unclean. We know this because it is the only Miqra’ey where yeasted bread is sanctioned – and because God has said so. Unlike the Catholic Eucharist, which is limited to their converts, this Festival comes with an open invitation. Shabuw’ah is the day that unites the promise with its purpose, making them one.
The reason for the yeast in the bread is ingenious. To become part of Yahowah’s family, we are all required to remove it from our lives – which is symbolic of walking away from Mitsraym and Babel where the integration of religion and politics was commonplace. And now that those who have disassociated from mankind’s most controlling and corrupting institutions have become immortal and perfected, adopted and empowered, as Covenant members we are perfectly equipped to share what we know with those most in need of hearing it – those under the influence of man’s malignant schemes. It is the cure for what ails them. And to help them, we must speak to them where we find them.
Upon examining the nature of this day, one comes to understand that the best way to broadcast its message and celebrate its inheritance is to host a grand party replete with a medley of foods, including a variety of libations, and most especially breads and desserts baked with yeast. Invite everyone who is interested in knowing God, whether 517they are engaged in a relationship with Him, mired in a religious swamp, or deluded by a secular mirage. After a time of casual conversation and music, stand before the guests and share what you have come to know about the path home our Heavenly Father has provided. Explain how, on this day, those who rely upon Passover, UnYeasted Bread, and Firstborn Children, and who have been immersed in Yahowah’s Set-Apart Spirit, grow, becoming productive Covenant members prepared for the harvest. Most of all, have fun. Radiate the light which comes from knowing Yah and express the joy loving families experience as their children grow.
Each Miqra’ has been designed to memorialize an important event in the life of Yisra’el and to be prophetic of even more important events in the unfolding of Yahowah’s redemptive plan. They speak poignantly of Yahowah’s role in the reconciliation of His people, with detail after detail pointing directly and unambiguously toward the Towrah as the map and light along the way.
Thus far, each of the first three Mow’ed have been introduced and fulfilled in the proper order, and on the very day of its announced celebration. That fact alone makes the odds against their coincidental fulfillment over a billion to one. The lesson is: pay attention to dates and numbers – they are important to our Creator.
And this pattern is important because there are three more annual Feasts yet to be realized in addition to the imminent fulfillment of the Shabuw’ah harvest. They all take place in the autumn, the seventh and final month of Yahowah’s redemptive calendar. Each predicts a strategically essential event in the reconciliation of Yisra’el and Yahuwdah with Yahowah. And more to the point, they complete the picture God is painting.
The spring Feasts have come to pass; the fall Feasts are yet to come. Yahowah has given us carefully drawn 518prophetic word pictures to teach us the most important lessons we can possibly learn.
While it is trivial by comparison, there is a sinister religious proclamation which may have inadvertently arisen as a result of Shabuw’ah – one which poisons one-and-a-half billion souls. To share Yahowah’s message of salvation in the language of the Araps / Arabs (in Acts 2:8-11), an alphabet was required, as the Arabs had none at this time. Written Arabic, the language of the Quran, was actually created by Syrian Yahuwdym | Jews who, as ‘Ebyownym, wanted to express what they had witnessed with their neighbors. The resulting “Syriac” alphabet and vocabulary, derived from the 22 letters which comprised the Hebrew alphabet in the 7th century CE, ultimately became the tool Satan would use in his most acclaimed recital: the Islamic Quran.
Of particular interest in this regard is the fact that almost all of the Quran’s essential terms are actually Hebrew, with a smattering of Greek – but not Arabic. And yet, Muslims the world over, unaware of the basis of their language, claim that those who do not read paleo-Arabic (which would include all but a few hundred people worldwide) cannot understand Allah’s message. That would be untrue because the best way to comprehend the Quran (besides reordering it chronologically and setting it into the context of Muhammad’s life as it is revealed in the Hadith / Oral Reports) is to appreciate the meaning of the Hebrew words which comprise the Quranic message.
This includes the title Quran itself. It is from the Hebrew Qara’ and conveys the same meaning: to read and recite. It is the first word that Satan, in the guise of a nameless Lord and then Gabry’el | Gabriel (a Hebrew name 519denoting Dowd as God’s Most Capable and Courageous Man) allegedly conveyed to Muhammad.
The basis of Allah’s claim, and the foundation of Islam, is the false notion that Allah, not Yahowah, was the God of ‘Adam, ‘Abraham, Moseh, Dowd, and the prophets, even Gospel Jesus (whom Allah calls Issa, Arabic for Esau). Allah protests that “his Quran confirms the Torah, Prophets, and Injeel / Evangelion or Gospels,” when in fact, Allah’s Quranic recital is the antithesis of Yahowah’s Towrah wa Naby’ and the Gospels contradict the Towrah as well.
Muhammad, for example, as Allah’s lone messenger, violated and negated each of the Ten Statements Yahowah etched in stone. Allah even says that “his Quran, written in pure Arabic,” was “inscribed on tablets before the world was created,” and the reason that the “Torah, Prophets, and Gospels” no longer convey the same message is that 7th-century CE Jews living in Yathrib, today’s Medina, “changed and corrupted their ‘scriptures’ to foil Muhammad.”
Therefore, the existence of the Dead Sea Scrolls proves that the Islamic god was lying. But more than this, it is unconscionable that the advocates of Islam, a religion which inverts and repudiates Yahowah’s message, claim that the Arabic of the Quran is proof of its superiority, and material to its message, when in fact, the means to convey it was developed by the very people Allah had pledged to “Wage War Against All Mankind” and Muhammad ordered to “Kill Every Jew.” They encouraged rape, engaged in slavery, and perpetrated genocide.
These things known, had rabbis, priests, and Christian theologians not removed Yahowah’s name from His Towrah wa Naby’, Islam would have been stillborn. Even a fool would have been able to recognize that Allah is not Yahowah.
520For more on this, please read the five volumes of God Damn Religion. They were written specifically to safeguard Israel from Islam and to hold Satan accountable for his death cult.
There is still much we can learn from this portrayal of what “happened” during the premature fulfillment of Seven Shabats – even if the primary lesson is to distrust the Christian New Testament.
“But (de) also (kai), all (pas) were astonished (existemi – astounded beyond comprehension), even (kai) perplexed and puzzled (diaporeo – embarrassed and in doubt, at a loss without sufficient information to render a rational conclusion), with different people (allos) saying (lego) to (pros) others (allos), ‘What (tis) is (eimi) the purpose of (thelo) this (houtos)?’” (Acts 2:12)
Let’s be honest, there was nothing everyone in Jerusalem agreed upon – not among the Romans and Greeks, and certainly not among Jews. Their history proves that Yahuwdym were divided among themselves. And it was their internal fractures which festered, bringing the wrath of Rome upon Judea with Pompey’s invasion in 63 BCE, Vespasian’s assault in 67 CE following the revolt in 66, and again following the Bar Kokhba uprising under Akiba by Hadrian in 133 CE. On all three occasions, the Jews would likely have prevailed over the Romans had they not been a house divided. And to some extent, with Progressive Jews demanding the disbandment of the democratically elected government of Prime Minister Netanyahu over judicial reform while the religious parasites among the Haredim needed it to maintain their unfair advantage, Israel, as a divided nation became vulnerable to what occurred on October 7th, 2023. And 521even during the massacre, the nation was paralyzed, unable to defend its people.
Any time we read, “with people saying…” we know that the writer’s sentiments are being projected upon his perceived foes. An actual quote would have to be attributed to a specific individual who said it and to another who heard it, in addition to providing the names or conditions under which it was preserved accurately over the decades.
Moreover, the Jews who at least should have known the purpose of Shabuw’ah. It was Greeks, like Luke, who were clueless.
When it comes to knowing the mind of God, there are several paths a person can take. Some simply ignore the quest, preoccupied with their mortal existence or overconfident that man is the highest form of life. Others, like the man who wrote this passage, do not know enough to draw an informed conclusion – or are driven by their own agenda. And while both of these roads lead to death, and to the destruction of one’s soul upon the completion of their mortal existence, there is a far worse fate awaiting those who promote the false notion that “Pentecost celebrates the birth of the Church.” There is no mention of a “Church” in the Towrah or in the Naby’. Only the Beryth and its Miqra’ey are presented. We have been called out of man’s world and into God’s realm, away from religion and into a familial relationship.
Even today, the secular and the sectarian ridicule the Mow’ed Miqra’ey, belittling them, concealing them, corrupting them, or counterfeiting them. It is why the narrow path to God remains unpopular.
“Others (heteros), now (de) poked fun, scoffing, sneering, and mocking (diachleuazo – flapping their lips and running their mouths), saying (legos), ‘It is because they are (hoti eimi) exceptionally full (mestoo) with sweet wine (gleukos – new wine which is still 522fermenting).’” (Acts 2:13)
If Luke had written about the correlation between the Towrah’s presentation of Shabuw’ah and its ultimate fulfillment rather than spending his time trying to besmirch Jews as slanderous and demeaning, there would be a point to this other than not to trust him.
And speaking of someone who did not trust him, Shim’own, misnamed “Petros” in this account, stood up and impeached himself, joining his nemesis Paul...
“But now (de) Petros (Petros – Peter, Greek for “rock”) stood up (histemi – made a stand so as to enable others to stand) with (syn) the eleven; he raised (epairomai) his voice (phone) and he spoke to them (apophthengomai – he addressed them), ‘Yahuwdym (Ioudaios – a transliteration of Yahuwdym – Beloved of Yahowah) men (andros) and all (pas) who dwell in (katoikeo) Yaruwshalaim (Ierousalem – a transliteration of Yaruwshalaim – the Source of Guidance on Reconciliation), listen carefully to (enotizomai) my voice (rhema), and let this (houtos) be (eimi) known (gnostos) to you…” (Acts 2:14)
We know that Paul disowned his Hebrew name, Sha’uwl, not only because it was synonymous with She’owl | Hell, but because of the many prophecies where he was called out by name and condemned. And so in a religion based upon changing Dowd’s name and title to Iesou Christou, it only seemed natural to replace Shim’own’s Hebrew name, which means “Listen to Him,” with the Aramaic Kephesh and then to the Greek “Petros,” for “Stone.”
The notion that there was a rumor of “intoxication,” and that “Peter” confronted it, is not likely, especially to say it in this way because it still infers that they were inebriated. But at least we finally have something to investigate with the upcoming reference to Yow’el | Joel.
523“…because (gar) they are not (ou) drunk (methuo – intoxicated) in the manner (hos) you suppose (hypolambano – are willing to accept), for indeed (gar) it is (eimi) the third (tritos) hour (hora) of the day (hemera). To the contrary (alla) this (houtos) exists as (eimi) the pronouncement (eipon) of (dia) the prophet (prophetes) Yow’el (Ioel – a transliteration of Yow’el, a contraction of Yahowah and ‘el, meaning Yahowah is God, but improperly transliterated Joel):” (Acts 2:15-16)
While we will turn to Yow’el to see what Shim’own may have intended to corrupt in due time, let it be known that Shabuw’ah is the pronouncement of the prophet Moseh on behalf of Yahowah. There is nothing in Yow’el / Joel to explain Seven Shabats. It speaks of the hellish conditions that will precede Yahowah’s return in 6000 Yah to fulfill Yowm Kipurym. Therefore, if Shim’own cited it as a retort to these supposed Jewish cynics, he was mistaken. It was the wrong Mow’ed and wrong time. And if Luke arbitrarily attributed this mistake to him, he demonstrated that his Gospel ought not be trusted. Either way, Acts 2:16 through 21 is erroneous.
According to Luke, Shim’own is said to have quoted Yow’el / Joel 2:28 through 32. At least that is what is recorded in Acts 2:17 through 2:21. However, since Shim’own did not deliver his “rebuttal” in Greek, even if it occurred, but instead in Hebrew, to accurately render what the Prophet wrote and what he may have said, we will need to examine it in the original language – something we will do momentarily and again during our review of the events pertaining to the Day of Reconciliations. So for now, here is that reading from the King James Version…
“And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh: and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams: (Acts 2:17) And on my servants and on my handmaidens I 524will pour out in those days of my Spirit; and they shall prophesy: (Acts 2:18)
And I will shew wonders in heaven above, and signs in the earth beneath; blood, and fire, and vapor of smoke: (Acts 2:19) The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before the great and notable day of the Lord come: (Acts 2:20) And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved.” (Acts 2:21)
Should you prefer a more literal and accurate rendering…
“And it shall come to be (eimi – exist in an identical fashion) in (en) the final (eschatos – the last in a series (the theological term eschatology is derived from this word)) days (hemera), God (ΘΣ – placeholder for theos) says (lego – affirms), ‘I will pour out (ekcheomai – I will bestow and spill, liberally distributing) from (apo) Me, My (ego) Spirit (ΠΝΣ – placeholder for pneuma) upon (epi – among) all (pasa) flesh (sarx – physical bodies, on the corporeal mortal nature of humankind).
Your sons (huios) and your daughters (thygater) will speak inspired utterances (propheteuo – proclaim what God wants known).
Your young men (neaniskos – used of males between twenty-four and forty years old) shall see visions (horasis – from horao, see with their own eyes), and your elders (presbyteros – old men and ranking individuals) will experience supernatural communication from God (enypnion enupniazomai – experience revelations while dreaming). (Acts 2:17)
Indeed (ge – really and truly), upon (epi) My male servants (doulos – slaves) and also upon My female servants (doule – female slaves) in (en) those (ekeinos) days (hemera – period of time) I will pour out (ekcheomai – 525I will shed and bestow, spill and distribute) from (apo) Me, My (ego) Spirit (ΠΝΑ – placeholder for pneuma) upon (epi – among) them and they will speak inspired utterances (propheteuo – proclaim what God wants known). (Acts 2:18)
And (kai) I will allow and produce (didomi – bestow and permit) wonders and miracles which foreshadow significant upcoming events (teras – omens, marvels, and signs which serve as portents to arouse attention) in (en) the sky (ouranos – atmosphere and universe) above (ano) and signs (semeion – miraculous signals and unusual occurrences which transcend the common course of nature) upon (epi) the earth (ge – land) below (kato): blood (haima), fire (pyr), and (kai) rising clouds of (atmis – steam, billowing vapor, from aer, air and atmospheric) smoke (kapnos). (Acts 2:19)
The sun (helios) will be changed (metastrepho – turned) to (eis) darkness (skotos – obscured, made gloomy, from skia, have its light intercepted as in a shadow), and the moon (selene) to (eis) blood (haima) before (prin) the coming (erchomai – arrival and appearance) of the (ho) great (megas – massively important and enormously sizable) and brilliantly shining (epiphanies – wonderful, glorious, radiant, and illustrious, notable appearance in clear and full view shining forth as light visible as a star) day (hemera – time) of the Lord (ΚΩ – placeholder for kurios – most always conveyed as “LORD”).” (Acts 2:20)
This is yet another nail in the coffin of souls clinging to the Christian New Testament. Even when its authors turned to the Prophets for credibility’s sake, they embarrassed themselves. This did not occur in 33 CE but will in 2033. To understand Shabuw’ah, we must turn to Moseh, not Yow’el. Yow’el’s prophecy is spectacular, confirming many of the things we have surmised while offering new insights regarding what we should expect as 526the world is transformed before our eyes during the transition between Shabuw’ah and Kipurym and again between Kipurym and Sukah.
It would be 2,000 years from 33 CE to the last days in 2033. That alone should have been sufficient to scuttle Luke’s credibility and the notion that Acts was inspired. The Spirit did not come upon all flesh at this time – not even close. There were no new prophets inspired either – something that would remain so from Mal’aky to the fulfillment of Kipurym in 6000 Yah.
On this day, and for the 2,000 which would transpire after it, there were no “wonders in the heavens or signs in the earth beneath.” There would be “blood and fire, vapor and smoke” – but these would be man’s doing, not God’s. The “sun was not darkened” and the “moon did not appear as blood” at this time because the Day of Reconciliations in 6000 Yah, not Shabuw’ah in 4000 Yah, is the “great and notable day” of Yahowah to come. Further, as evidenced by this writing, no one called upon Yahowah’s name, and thus no one was saved.
So please tell me, how is it that billions upon billions are fooled by such outright lies? Unable to produce a prophecy, or even understand one, these buffoons couldn’t even get their history right. The acceptance of Acts provides a sad commentary on the perceptiveness of humankind. Most have become as Shim’own was portrayed: as dumb as a stone.
As promised, and for comparison, in context, here is what the prophet Yow’el revealed pertaining to the days immediately prior to Yahowah’s return. And remember, according to Luke, Shim’own is said to have quoted Yow’el / Joel 2:28 through 32 to explain the non-event not being witnessed in 33 CE that had nothing to do with Yahowah or His people.
“Rejoice over these favorable circumstances (gyl) 527Children of Zion (beny Tsyown). Demonstrate a positive attitude (wa samach) with (ba) Yahowah (YaHoWaH), your God (‘elohym ‘atah), for (ky) He has provided for you (nathan la ‘atem) that which is associated with the autumn rains through a teacher who communicates what you need to know about the towrah to live (mowreh) so that you can be right and thus vindicated (la tsadaqah).
He has brought down (yarad) for you (la ‘atem) an abundant shower (gesem) of guidance and instruction, pouring out what you should be contemplating regarding the towrah’s teaching and directions, communicating as a teacher what you need to know (mowreh) about being gleaned and growing thereafter (malqowsh) as was intended in the beginning, returning to where it all began (ba ha ri’shown). (Yow’el 2:23)
The threshing floors (ha goren) will be filled (male’) with pure grain, symbolic of the most radiant children (bar). And fresh, new wine, sweeter with less fermentation (thyrowsh), will overflow (suwq) the presses and vats (yeqeb) along with olive oil (wa ytshar). (Yow’el 2:24)
I will reconcile and restore by fulfilling My promises (wa shalem) on your behalf (la ‘atem) the years (‘eth ha shanah) which (‘asher) suddenly disappeared (ha ‘arbeh) and were devoured (‘akal)… (Yow’el 2:25) Then you shall be nourished (wa ‘akal ‘akal). And you shall be overwhelmingly satisfied (saba’), radiating a clear and brilliant light while cheering (halal) the name (‘eth shem) of Yahowah (Yahowah), your God (‘elohym ‘atem), who, for the benefit of the relationship (‘asher), has acted and will engage (‘asah) marvelously (pala’) with you (‘im ‘atem). So never again will My People be humiliated or disrespected (wa lo’ bowsh ‘am ‘any la ‘owlam). (Yow’el 2:26)
528All of this will play out during the decade between 10.07.23 and 10.07.33. Are you ready?
When Yahowah speaks of being with Yisra’el, He is identifying with the best of His people, beginning with ‘Abraham and Sarah, Yitschaq and Ribqah, Ya’aqob and Leah, and then on to the likes of Moseh, Yahowsha’, Kaleb, Shamuw’el, Dowd, Yow’el, ‘ElYah, Yasha’yah, Yirma’yah, Zakaryah, and Mal’aky. And His Family now includes the children of the Covenant who were led home by Yada Yahowah. These are God’s people.
And you will know (wa yada’) that I am in the midst (ky qereb ‘any) of Yisra’el (Yisra’el). I am (wa ‘any) Yahowah (Yahowah), your God (‘elohym ‘atah), and there is no other (wa ‘ayn ‘owd). My Family (wa ‘any) will never be disapproved of or experience distress (lo’ bowsh) again throughout the remainder of time (la ‘owlam). (Yow’el 2:27)
This is occurring now, in advance of the Shabuw’ah Harvest. And it will occur again beginning on the 1st of ‘Abyb at the midpoint of the Time of Israel’s Troubles as Yada heralds the return of Yisra’el. And then, like now, there will be a chorus of voices calling Yahuwdym out of Babylon and back to Yahowah. To participate, we must listen to our God and then share His testimony.
While this introduction decimates Christian credibility, we have now reached the prophetic narrative Peter misappropriated and misconstrued even worse than anything we have seen previously from Paul.
And (wa) it will literally come to pass at that very moment (hayah) during the last days (‘achar), therefore (ken), I will pour out (shaphak) My Spirit (‘eth ruwach ‘any) upon (‘al) all (kol) who hear and proclaim the message (basar) and they will be inspired by the Spirit (wa naba’ ruwach). Your sons (ben ‘atem) and your daughters (wa bath ‘atem) as well as your elderly (wa 529zaqen ‘atem) will have their thoughts guided by Divine revelations and be empowered as a result (chalam chalowm). Your young will become capable (bachuwr ‘atem) by choosing to continually witness, observing and considering (ra’ah) these communications from God (chizayown). (Yow’el Joel 2:28)
And also (wa gam) upon (‘al) those who work (ha ‘ebed) and upon (wa ‘al) those engaged in service to the family (shaphchah) in those days (ba ha yowm ha hem), I will bestow (shaphak) My Spirit (‘eth ruwach ‘any). (Yow’el 2:29)
As the world collapses all around Israel during the Time of Trouble, and particularly seven years after the Shabuw’ah Harvest, there will be a revival in the Promised Land with the Chosen People. Open and declutter your mind, focus your eyes on the Towrah and Prophets as they are presented and explained throughout Yada Yahowah, listen to God, and then respond. Let’s sing His Son’s Songs.
The year spoken of is unique in that there will be signs in the sky with a total solar eclipse on the 1st of ‘Abyb, March 31st, 2033, demarking the first day of the 120th Yowbel year 6000 Yah. Two weeks later, as we celebrate Passover the evening of the 13th and UnYeasted Bread on the 14th of April 2033, there will be a total lunar eclipse visible in Israel. Then on the first day of the seventh month, heralding the Yowm Taruw’ah Harvest, there will be a second solar eclipse on Friday, September 23rd, 2033. The fourth eclipse will be lunar and occur 15 days later on the Shabat of October 7th to acknowledge the celebration of Sukah.
We are not told when Yow’el | Yahowah is God was inspired to memorialize these profound prophecies regarding our time. The most logical conclusion is that he was in the final succession and, thus, immediately before 530Zakaryah and Mal’aky. Through him, God said…
Then (wa) I will provide (nathan) signs (mowpheth) in the heavens (ba ha shamaym) and on the Earth (ba ha ‘erets): blood (dam) and fire (wa ‘ets), along with columns of smoke (wa tymarah). (Yow’el 2:30) The sun (ha shemesh) will become weaker and unreliable (haphak) and thus darker by being obscured (la choshek). And the moon (wa ha yareach) will be bloody red (dam) before the vitally important and awe-inspiring day (la yowm ha gadowl wa ha yare’) of Yahowah’s appearance (paneh Yahowah) arrives (bow’). (Yow’el / Yahowah is God 2:31)
Beyond the four eclipses, these additional atmospheric occlusions are possible: nuclear war, super-volcano eruptions, an asteroid strike, a reversal of the Earth’s magnetic field, or catastrophic fires driven by excessive winds, global warming, and drought – even a massive solar storm or supernova explosion targeting our planet.
Fortunately, Yahowah is offering an all-expense-paid trip out of harm’s way…
And it shall come to pass at that moment in time (wa hayah) that all who, to receive the benefits of the relationship (kol ‘asher), call out to meet (qara’) in the name (ba shem) of Yahowah (YaHoWaH) will be spared and delivered, protected from danger and saved from harm (malat). Indeed (ky), with the Mountain of the Signs Posted Along the Way (ba har Tsyown), and in Jerusalem (ba ha Yaruwshalaim), there will be (hayah) deliverance for a remnant (paleytah), just as (ka ‘asher) Yahowah (YaHoWaH) has promised (‘amar).
And among the survivors within this remnant (wa ba ha saryd) will be those benefiting from the relationship whom (‘asher) Yahowah (Yahowah) has invited and welcomed (qara’).” (Yow’el 2:32)
531This was the conclusion of Peter’s appalling citation. He got nothing right and cited each prooftext incorrectly. He could not have chosen a more inappropriate prophecy to extract and he could not have misrepresented it to a greater extent than he did. He would have done better, at least staying in the proper genre, fable to fable, had he sung the Siren Song from the Odyssey where manic creatures knowing both past and future, lured men to their demise in the windless calm of the midday sun, “Once he hears to his heart’s content, sails on, a wiser man. We know all the pains that the Greeks and Trojans once endured on spreading plain of Troy when the gods willed it so – all that comes to pass on the fertile earth, we know it all.”
While it is my intent to reconvene with Yow’el in volume 5 of Twistianity ~ Imposter, for now, let’s honor the prophet by keeping his revelation intact. In his next line, he would say…
“Look and notice (hineh), because, indeed (ky), in those days (ba ha yowmym ha hem), and during this particular time (wa ha ba ‘eth ha hy’), when, for the benefit of the relationship (‘asher), I will return to restore (shuwb) the fortunes, freedom, and property (shebuwt) of Yahuwdah (Yahuwdah) and Yaruwshalaim (Yaruwshalaim). (Yow’el / Joel 3:1)
Then (wa) I will collect and assemble (qabats) all of the gentile nations (kol ha gowym) and bring them down (wa yarad hem) to the Valley (‘emeq) of Yahowshaphat | Yahowah Judges (Yahowshaphat). And I will enter into judgment against them (wa shaphat ‘im hem) there (sham) on behalf of My people (‘al ‘am ‘any) and My inheritance (wa nachalah ‘any), Yisra’el | Individuals who Engage and Endure with God (Yisra’el).
They have scattered and dispersed them (pazar) among the gentile nations (ba ha gowym) and My Land (wa ‘erets ‘any), they have divided and apportioned 532(chalaq).” (Yow’el 3:2)
There is no room for Christianity, Judaism, Islam, or Progressive politics in these words. The future bodes poorly for them, and well for Yahuwdym engaged in the Covenant and anticipating Yahowah’s return.
With few exceptions, world leaders, the media, and academia oppose Israel and advocate appeasing Muslims by rewarding the terrorists with a state carved out of their land. For doing so, there will be a price to pay.
“And the children of Yahuwdah | Jews (wa ben Yahuwdah) and the children of Yaruwshalaim | Jerusalem (wa ben Yaruwshalaim), you have betrayed, exchanging them (makar) for the descendants of that which is Grecian (la ben ha Yawany) for the express purpose (la ma’an) of removing them (rachaq hem) from their own territory and bounds (min ‘al gebuwl hem).” (Yow’el 3:6)
There is only one place on Earth where an effective military is necessary and beneficial due to the proximity, quantity, and insanity of the nation’s foes and vicious neighbors. Although for it to prevail, the generals must be replaced by more responsible leaders.
“Read and recite this (qara’ zo’th) against the foreigners (ba ha gowym). Be set apart and prepared (qadash) to engage in battle (milchamah). Alert and arouse (‘uwr) the most valiant, accomplished leaders and battle-hardened fighters (gibowr). Approach and rise up (nagash ‘alah) every man who is able and equipped to fight (kol ‘ysh ha milchamah). (Yow’el 3:9)
Beat (katat) your plowshares (‘eth ‘atem) into swords (la chereb) and your pruning hooks (wa mazmerah ‘atem) into lances (la romach). Let the weak and disabled (chalash) say (‘amar), ‘I am a capable fighter and honorable defender (gibowr ‘any).’ (Yow’el 5333:10) Provide assistance without hesitation (‘uwsh). Then come (wa bow’) all of you foreign invaders (kol ha gowym) from all around (min sabyb). Assemble there (qabats sham). Yahowah (YaHoWaH), bring down (nachath) your most prominent warrior (gibowr ‘atah). (Yow’el 3:11)
The foreigners (gowym) will be aroused, stirring themselves up (‘uwr) going off (‘alah) to the Valley (‘emeq) of Yahowshaphat | Yahowah’s Judgment (Yahowshaphat). There (sham), I will enter into judgment against them (wa shaphat ‘im hem). There (sham), I will sit (yashab) to judge (shaphat) all of the foreigners (‘eth kol ha gowym) from all over (min sabyb). (Yow’el 3:12)
Extend (shalach) the reaping sickle (magal) because (ky) the harvest (qatsyr) is ripe (bashal). Return and be included (bow’) to demonstrate your dominion (radah) because the winepress (gath) is full (male’). The vats (ha yeqeb) have reached their ideal capacity (shuwq) because the consequence of them being wrong is great and there are so many of them who are immoral and miserable (ky rab ra’ah hem). (Yow’el 3:13)
Vast multitudes of uproarious and confused people making an intolerable racket (hamown hamown) are in (ba) the deep depression (‘emeq) of judgment, condemnation, and punishment (charuwts). For indeed (ky), the Day (yowm) of Yahowah (YaHoWaH) is approaching (qarowb) in (ba) the Valley (‘emeq) of the verdict determining the sentence for those whose guilt is being assessed (charuwts). (Yow’el 3:14)
Yahowah (Yahowah) roars (sha’ag) from (min) Tsyown | the Signs Posted Along the Way (Tsyown). He offers His voice (wa nathan qowl huw’) from (min) Yaruwshalaim | the Source of Teaching and Guidance on Reconciliation (Yaruwshalaim). The atmosphere 534trembles and shakes (wa ra’ash shamaym) along with the Earth (wa ‘erets), while (wa) Yahowah (Yahowah) provides protection and shelter (machseh) for His family (la ‘am huw’) along with (wa) a safe situation (ma’owz) for the Children of Yisra’el (beny Yisra’el). (Yow’el 3:16)
Therefore (wa), you should know (yada’) that (ky), I am (‘any) Yahowah (YaHoWaH). Your God (‘elohym ‘atem) lives; He resides and remains (shakan) in Tsyown (ba Tsyown) – My Set-Apart Mountain (har qodesh ‘any). Then also (wa) Yaruwshalaim | the Source of Teaching and Guidance on Reconciliation (Yaruwshalaim) will be (hayah) set apart and special (qodesh). Unauthorized and illegitimate strangers (zar) will never pass through it again (lo’ ‘abar ba hy’ ‘owd). (Yow’el / Yahowah is God 3:17)
This is the day of Yahowah’s return – Yowm Kipurym in year 6000 Yah / sunset in Jerusalem, October 2nd, 2033. It will be like no other. For the surviving remnant of Yisra’el, God’s blessings will be showered upon them. But for foreigners, should they be Christians, Haredim, Muslims, Progressives, or Communists, their scriptures and weapons of war will be turned to mush, destroyed while their souls are either exterminated or separated.
Yahowah has prepared His provision for reconciliation even though it has been a long time coming from a human perspective. Nearly 2,600 years would pass between inspiring these words and being able to hold His children in His arms. This grieves God. When we return to Howsha’ and read what led to this, what follows portrays a father anguishing over his wayward children.
With this sobering evaluation of Luke’s late 1st-century assessment of Shim’own’s protestations against his fellow Yahuwdym during an errant rendition of Seven Sevens attributed to Joel, now behind us, the pathetic 535diatribe nevertheless continues…
And it shall come to pass (eimi – be that) all (pas – everyone) who (hos), and as many as (an – used as a preposition to present a possibility), call upon (epikaleomai – ask for help in and bear) the (ho) personal and proper name (onoma) of the Kurio | Lord (ΚΩ) will be saved (sozo).’ (Acts 2:21)
“Yisra’elite (Israelites – a transliteration of Yisra’elite) men (andros), listen to (akouo) these words (logos): Iesou (ΙΝΥ – a placeholder for Iesou) the Nazarene (Nazoraios), is a man (andros) who publicly demonstrated (apodeiknymi) to (eis) you (sy) that He is from (apo) Theos (ΘΣ – placeholder for theos – god) using supernatural powers and abilities (dynamis) to perform extraordinary miracles with prophetic significance (teras).
These are signs (semeion) which (hos) Theos (ΘΣ – placeholder for theos – god) performed (poieomai) through (dia) him (autos) in your midst (mesos) as (kathos) you know (oida).” (Acts 2:22)
Should this sound familiar, it is. We dialed into Luke’s bizarre presentation of Peter’s speech at this point in the Anti-Semite chapter.
And as I pointed out then, there was no one named Iesou, much less “Jesus,” in the 1st century CE. There are no prophecies regarding the arrival of an Iesou | Jesus. It was Dowd who had been foretold to arrive to fulfill Pesach and Matsah leading to Bikuwrym. He had come and gone by this point, leaving a void which Christians filled with Foolology.
As you are aware, the town of Nazoraios | Nazareth didn’t exist in the 1st century. There had been a small village by another name in that location several hundred years prior, but it had been abandoned by the 2nd century 536BCE. The myth of “Jesus of Nazareth” was developed jointly by Emperor Constantine’s mother after her tour of the “Holy Land” and Constantine’s propagandist, the nefarious Roman Catholic Bishop Eusebius in the 4th century CE.
Since Iesou never existed, it would have been miraculous, I suppose, for him to have made a public demonstration of Godly intent. And as we have become aware, when someone claims to be using “supernatural powers to perform miracles” they are showing off in league with Satan and not serving Yah.
While it was true that the Yahuwdym in Yahuwdah during the 80th Yowbel year of 4000 Yah / 33 CE failed to recognize Dowd as the Son of God fulfilling Passover, it cannot be said that they “knew” Iesou | Jesus of Nazoraios | Nazareth who performed feats of derring-do…
“He was appointed to (horizo) the prearranged and prophetic (prognosis) plan and purpose (boule) of Theos (ΘΣ), he was betrayed and given over (ekdotos) to (dia) the hand (cheir) of the ‘Towrahless’ (anomos) who chose to take control and lift him up (anaireo), affixing him (prospegnumi).” (Acts 2:23)
The reason neither Luke nor Peter and Paul made any attempt to validate this bogus bill is that there was nothing to misappropriate. Every prophetic portrayal pertaining to the fulfillment of Passover points to Dowd, as do all narratives addressing the return of our king.
As we have discussed, the coconspirators who conceived the Christian myth were keen on delegitimizing and demonizing Jews because, without doing so, there was no reason for their god to abandon them or replace Jews with gowym | gentiles. And so, while it was “Peter’s” intent to protest that his “Israelite” audience “betrayed” the mythical god-man and “gave him over” to the control of the anomos | Towrahless to be crucified, it was Peter, Paul, 537and Company who were “Towrahless.”
With Calvinism on the rise in the West, I would like to make an important distinction. Yahowah’s response to the fallen nature of humankind was predetermined but our response to God is always subject to freewill. Each of us has the opportunity to ignore God’s plan, serve a god of man’s making, accept Yahowah, or reject Him.
Within prophecy there are certain things which Yahowah has preordained – the fulfillment of the Miqra’ey are examples. They will be accomplished on the stage of human events in complete accord with the Towrah’s | Teaching, all in the proper order and on the predetermined day, regardless of mankind’s response.
Other prophecies simply report what mankind will do with the continued exercise of freewill. In such cases, Yahowah has witnessed our future and is reporting back to us what He has seen. When these things occur as He attested, we are provided proof that we can trust His testimony. So, while Yahowah was certain that Yahuwdym would return to Yisra’el in the last days as a result of the Holocaust, He had no hand in those horrific events. Individual men and women made poor decisions, squandering the gift of freewill, and the consequences were devastating. Such will continue to be the case between now and 2033.
What follows is essential to Peter and Paul’s claim that Christians replaced Jews because Jews, according to the Christian mythology, betrayed God. As we know, Jews failed to recognize Dowd and they did not acknowledge his fulfillment of Passover, UnYeasted Bread, or Firstborn Children. However, as I have pointed out, there is a substantial difference between being unaware or complicit in a crime of this magnitude, between not knowing or betraying the Son of God.
Further, Christians are actually complicit in this regard 538because they deliberately attributed Dowd’s sacrifice to their mythical misnomer Iesou | Jesus. Then they would attest that he was murdered and resurrected, which is wholly disjoined from Pesach, Matsah, and Bikuwrym.
It should be noted that everyone was “Towrahless” at this time. The Jews turned to their Talmud, the Greeks to the Odyssey, the Romans to the Aeneid, and the Christians to Paul’s Epistles.
While prospegnumi is almost always translated as “crucify,” this Greek word simply means to “affix and to fasten.” I bring this to your attention because the Roman cross and its piercing nails were irrelevant. Christianity has made a religion out of an inanimate object. It is like crediting a knife that takes the lamb’s life for the Yatsa’ | Exodus rather than Pesach. The fulfillment of Passover is about the who, where, why, and when, not the how or even the what.
As an interesting aside, it is worth noting that the preponderance of Catholic sculptures and paintings depict Gospel Jesus in one of two ways: as a helpless infant attached to his mother or helplessly affixed to a cross. It is as if the Catholic hierarchy has chosen to control him in these ways. They are quietly saying: if he cannot take care of himself, why would you trust him to take care of you?” And that leads to: “Trust us instead with your soul.”
“Theos (ΘΩ) restored him to life and raised him (anistamai), releasing and dismissing him (lou) from the suffering and pain (odin) of death (thanatos) because (kathoti) it was not (ou) possible (dynatos) for him to exist (eimi) held and influenced (krateo) by (hypo) these things.” (Acts 2:24)
The Passover Lamb is not resurrected or revived because that would defeat the purpose. Moreover, Dowd’s soul did not die, not 3,000 years ago or 2,000 years ago. Had Dowd’s nepesh been extinguished, there would have 539been no way to fulfill Matsah or Bikuwrym, or any means for him to return as King in 2033.
At the time, Dowd’s soul was not released from the pain and suffering he endured because it is graphically conveyed in the 22nd Mizmowr. Before his basar was removed from the Roman implement of torture, it succumbed to the injuries they had inflicted. In so doing, Dowd fulfilled the role of the Pesach ‘Ayil.
It was She’owl | Hell which was incapable of holding Dowd’s soul, not odin | suffering pain or thanatos | death. This distinction is essential and yet it was misrepresented by the alleged disciple.
If a group of Yahuwdym had actually handed the Messiah and King over to the Romans to fulfill his calling, then, rather than blaming and shaming them, we ought to be thanking them. Fulfilling Pesach was essential for us to live, and for that to occur, the lamb must die.
Oddly, and apparently losing track of what he was discussing, Peter’s diatribe was supposedly in support of misrepresenting the Miqra’ of Shabuw’ah. So why is Peter fixated on presenting what occurred previously? And why, if his intent was to also cover the events of Pesach, Matsah, and Bikuwrym, didn’t he mention any of these by name?
This absurd narrative is fixated on attributing Divine attributes to Iesou rather than explaining the benefits of the Mow’ed. If Peter wanted to speak about why the Messiah was here, the time to do it was on Passover, not pretend-Shabuw’ah. Even within the jaundiced Christian accounts, Gospel Jesus departed prior to this time. The events of this day had nothing to do with him or even what Dowd had done.
That said, there are few things as beneficial when understood as what actually transpired on Passover, UnYeasted Bread, and Firstborn Children as it relates to 540Dowd’s basar | corporeal body and nepesh | consciousness. Fortunately, those who have been with us from the beginning know that Yahowah honored His promise to provide the Lamb by accommodating the request of His Beloved Son to serve in this way. And we know that what remained of his mutilated body was discarded and then incinerated later that night in accordance with Yahowah’s instructions.
During UnYeasted Bread, a Shabat in 33 CE, the Messiah’s soul entered She’owl carrying the guilt of every Covenant member. He would leave it there, never to be seen again. As a result, those who capitalize upon what Dowd has done for us are perfect before God.
Mission accomplished, Dowd’s nepesh | soul was released from the place of separation on Bikuwrym, fulfilling Firstborn Children as Yahowah’s Bakowr | Firstborn Son.
While the Shabuw’ah Harvest is possible as a result of Dowd’s contributions to our lives, it would have to wait. On this day, there were no beneficiaries and, therefore, no one to call home.
The Apostle’s pretend-Shabuw’ah soliloquy was “advanced” by way of a second Tanakh citation, this time from the 16th Mizmowr / Psalm. So as to better understand why he selected it, let’s begin our examination by studying the entire Song from which the excerpt was taken. Shim’own would not have cited it in a vacuum so we should not approach it out of context either.
It begins…
“A poem (miktam – a written piece of literature, inscribed by staining the parchment upon which it is indelibly conveyed) concerning Dowd (la Dowd – about the Beloved).
You want to watch closely over me and be 541concerned about me (shamar ‘any – You keep a caring focus upon me, tending to me by choice, and You are observant regarding me), God (‘el), because (ky) in You (ba ‘atah – with You), I confide and rely, I trust so I am kept safe and comforted (chasah – I depend on for protection and safekeeping). (Mizmowr / Psalm 16:1)
I say (‘amar – I confess and convey, expressing in words), to approach (la – drawing near and concerning) Yahowah (Yahowah), ‘You are my foundation and support (‘edown ‘any ‘atah – You are my Upright One who is the Pillar of my Tabernacle), I have nothing to offer which is worthwhile or useful (tobah ‘any bal – I have nothing good, satisfying, or beneficial) apart from You (‘al ‘atah).’” (Mizmowr / Psalm 16:2)
Our goal in life ought to be to approach Yahowah. The result is to be enriched by that which is genuinely worthwhile and beneficial. If Dowd, the man with the most illustrious résumé on Earth, felt this way, it is appropriate for us. The most brilliant mind and articulate orator in human history credited Yahowah in everything.
I find it particularly reassuring that Dowd found pleasure in knowing that we would capitalize upon what he had written to lead others to this same place…
“Regarding (la) the Set Apart (qadowsh – the separated and uncommon) in the Land (ba ha ‘erets – within the country and material realm) who show the way to the relationship (‘asher – who lead to the benefits of the proper path), they are also (hem wa) awesome (‘adyr – marvelous, desirable, and splendid, honorable and worthy), and in them (ba hem – with them) is all my satisfaction and enjoyment (kol chephets – is my greatest joy, engendering my complete support and appreciation).” (Mizmowr / Psalm 16:3)
God’s Covenant Family are Yah-some.
542Dowd is excited about what matters most: adding to Yah’s Family. He knows that life with Yahowah is marvelous. And otherwise, life is traumatic for those who impetuously chase after imaginary gods. Dowd, having experienced the best his Father has to offer, wants the same result for his people. It is what qualifies him to serve as Yah’s shepherd.
“The sorrows and suffering (‘atsebeth – the anxiety and anguish, the unfavorable circumstances and mental state, as well as the trauma) of those (hem) who are impetuous and who chase after (mahar – who are rash and without wisdom, who are fearful, and unwilling to invest the time to study, and who quickly buy into) another (‘achar – someone or something different, either following along or doing so to develop a following) will be great as they will be numerous and influential (rabah – will multiply, becoming the preponderance of people, and who through their popularity will gain tremendous status).
Their drink offerings of blood (nesek hem min dam – their sacred and pagan liquid libations to a deity associated with killing and death [a.k.a. the Roman Catholic claim that “Jesus” died and that they are drinking his blood during their Eucharist]), I will never pour or offer (bal nasak – I will not endorse or cause to happen). And I will not advance or promote (ba nasa’ – I will never lift up or bear, honor or respect, desire or tolerate) their names (‘eth shem hem) on my lips (‘al sapah – as part of my speech).” (Mizmowr / Psalm 16:4)
This is the choice between Moseh and Paul, Dowd or Jesus, the Towrah or the New Testament, a relationship or a religion, the Covenant or Christianity, life or death. The latter is the fate of those who are impetuous and fearful, unwilling to invest the time to study the actual words Yahowah conveyed.
Dowd is explaining that he will never endorse 543anything the largest and most powerful institution to co-opt his reputation does or says. He will not partake in their Eucharist or accept their names. He, as is the case with every one of Yahowah’s prophets, never speaks on behalf of a Christ, Christian, Jesus, Catholic, Cross, or Church.
The Roman Catholic Church deliberately and dishonestly stole what Yahowah gave to His Son and to His people. Therefore, Dowd has a great deal to say about the consequence of its crime of identity theft. Christianity not only became the most pervasive and abusive adversary to his people, but no institution in human history would mislead as many souls. And they would do so through Foolology: stealing for themselves God’s promises to His beloved Son and our Savior.
Dowd chose wisely, and he was rewarded for being right…
“Yahowah’s (Yahowah) gift is my decision, my fate, my assigned share, and my reward (manath cheleq ‘any – is my allotment by choice, my portion of what is offered, and my nourishment) as well as my cup and receptacle (wa kows ‘any – and the vessel containing what I will drink). You (‘atah) uphold (tamak) my lot and destiny (gowral ‘any – my portion, my systematic means of making decisions, delineating the outcome).” (Mizmowr / Psalm 16:5)
Those who participate in the Eucharist, where priests claim that they have turned wine into the blood of Jesus, or even partake in Communion, which is the Protestant alternative to Passover, will die, as did their imaginary god. Life is afforded to those who accept Yahowah’s reward. And this begins by recognizing that Dowd served as the Passover Lamb and fulfilled UnYeasted Bread to remove the fungus of religion from our souls.
“The measuring lines (chebel – the inheritance and boundaries, the shares and apportionments) have aligned 544for me (naphal la ‘any – have been allotted and distributed to be) in highly acceptable and delightful ways (ba ha na’ym – in pleasant and favorable places). Surely (‘aph), I have been offered (‘al ‘any) an enjoyable and pleasing, especially brilliant (shaphar – a lovely and beautiful, radiant and bright) inheritance (nachalah – association and share).” (Mizmowr / Psalm 16:6)
This is true not only for Dowd, Yah’s Son, but for those who follow his lead. He was the Bakowr | Firstborn of Chag Matsah, but hardly the last. The Messiah opened the door and provided the way for us to enjoy Bikuwrym, participate in the Shabuw’ah and Taruw’ah Harvests and celebrate his Kipurym homecoming.
The universe we have been given to explore exists in dimensions beyond what we can presently perceive – and Heaven is yet another dimension beyond. Our inheritance through the Covenant is bright and beautiful. As a result, it is fitting and right…
“I will commend the excellence of (barak ‘eth – I favor the goodness and I am thankful for the greatness of) Yahowah (Yahowah), who, to show the way to the benefits of the relationship (‘asher – who, to lead the way to the path to get the greatest joy out of life), determines the plan and provides me with counsel and purpose (ya’ats ‘any – decides the direction and offers me advice), even as (‘aph ), during the night (laylah), my emotional response to being Yah’s implement (kilyah ‘any – my kidneys (which the ancient Hebrews perceived as the source of emotions), core nature, inclinations, and feelings, my innermost being; a compound of kol – total, kaly – implement of Yah) provides me with disciplined teaching, proper instruction, and correction (yasar ‘any – facilitates my training and acceptance, direction and guidance).” (Mizmowr / Psalm 16:7)
This is why Yahowah chose Dowd, called him His 545son, anointed him Mashyach, inspired him as a prophet, appointed him Shepherd and King, and enabled him with His Spirit. It was for our benefit.
Yahowah is offering His children the ultimate reward: eternal life in His presence. It is a brilliant inheritance. And for it, we should be as Dowd was – appreciative, ever willing to proclaim the excellence of Yahowah and the resulting relationship.
The point of all of this is that we can live like Dowd, think like Dowd, and experience what Dowd enjoyed when we study his words and apply them to our lives. We should all be singing along, at least up to the point of screaming.
By robbing the world of everything Dowd contributed to our lives to legitimize the Dionysian caricature of “Jesus Christ,” Peter, Paul, and pals transformed the Passover Lamb into an anti-Semitic monster. To confront this, Dowd leveled a broadside against the Gnostic nature of Pauline Christianity. The argument used to rob Yahowah, His Towrah, His Covenant, His People, and His Mashyach of their relevance was to opine that they were of the flesh, which, from the Gnostic perspective, was corruptible and evil.
The Messiah saw the Towrah for what its name implies: the source of disciplined teaching and proper instruction. His life’s mission was to commend what Yahowah had revealed to show the way to receive the benefits of this relationship. As a result, Dowd became the centerpiece of God’s plan for His people. He is the Cornerstone upon which the Covenant Family and Home are built. Everything God has said and done coalesces such that we are in the right frame of mind to capitalize on the life and lyrics of the Zarowa’.
“I intensely desire to firmly place (shawah – I genuinely want to put) Yahowah (Yahowah) before me (la neged ‘any – in front of me) always and continuously 546(tamyd). Indeed (ky), as a result of (min) me being right (yamyn ‘any – my orientation, right side, or right hand, even looking east as the sun rises), I shall neither be shaken nor fall into an unfavorable or unresolvable circumstance (bal mowt – I will not slip up, be dislodged, habitually stagger, fail, or fall, nor will I lose control, be random in my approach, or found inadequate (nifal imperfect – it is by being right that Dowd carries out and also receives the benefits which are ongoing throughout time)).” (Mizmowr / Psalm 16:8)
While this would have been an exceedingly odd place for Shim’own to have begun his citation of a Mizmowr, it is nonetheless the place Luke jumped aboard. By doing so, rather than realizing that the Psalm describes Dowd’s relationship with Yahowah, the reader of Acts is fooled into believing that David was speaking prophetically of the Christian “Jesus Christ” and referring to him as “the Lord.” I kid you not…
“For David speaketh concerning him [the context would make “him” “Jesus”], ‘I foresaw the Lord always before my face, for he is on my right hand, that I should not be moved: (Acts 2:25 KJV) Therefore did my heart rejoice, and my tongue was glad; moreover also my flesh shall rest in hope:” (Acts 2:26 KJV)
Or if you prefer the more literal rendering…“For (gar – because) David (ΔΔ – a placeholder for Dowd using the Greek transliteration Dauid) said (lego – declared) of (eis) him (autos), ‘I foresee (proorao) the Lord (ΚΩ – placeholder for kurios – the Lord and Master) in front of (enopion – and before) me (ego) always (pas) on my behalf (dia) because (hoti) from (ek – out of) His right hand (dexios – authority) I will not be (me eimi) shaken or swayed (saleuomai – be overthrown or distressed). (Acts 2:25)
Therefore (dia), my heart (kardia) rejoices 547(euphrainomai – celebrates), and my tongue (glossa – speech) delights (agalliao) that also (eti) my flesh (sarkos) will abide and endure (kataskenoo – live) as a result of (epi) a confident and trusting expectation (elpis).’” (Acts 2:26)
This horribly misconstrued paraphrase of Psalm 16:8-9 was wrongly attributed. In Acts 2:22-24, Shim’own was supposedly telling the Jews all about the miraculous nature of “Jesus.” So by saying that “David spoke concerning ‘him’,” Dowd’s assessment of his own relationship with Yahowah was wrongly projected on “Jesus.” This fraud in the inception and execution was perpetrated by Peter and Luke demonstrates that nothing either of them wrote or said should be trusted. This was a deliberate lie and it was deployed to validate the religion of Christianity.
In his Mizmowr, Dowd referred to God by His one and only name. Those who know Him do so.
“Therefore (la ken – it is reasonable and rational as a consequence that), my attitude and thinking (leb ‘any – my inclination and disposition, my judgment and approach, my character and nature, my internal resolve and thoughtful response) are joyous (samach – are upbeat and happy, elated and content). What’s more (wa), the manifestation of power which is abundant and valued within my persona (kabowd ‘any – the glorious and rewarding Divine presence within me) expresses His joy over this enormously favorable and uplifting situation and outcome (gyl – sings and shouts as a result, calling out in jubilation, utterly delighted in this situation).
In addition (‘aph – moreover and furthermore), my Herald, proclaiming the good news regarding my corporeal body (basar – my pronouncement and positive news regarding my physical human and animal nature, and the substance which sustains that life), lives and abides (shakan – dwells and remains, camping out for a 548considerable period of time) with confidence (la betach – safely and securely, without any concern, through trusting and relying; from batach – to trust and rely with confidence and be bold, living without fear).” (Mizmowr / Lyrics to Sing / Psalm 16:9)
For those paying attention, Dowd’s declaration regarding his basar served yet another knockout blow to Peter and Paul. Since Dowd and his Herald are correct regarding the importance of Dowd’s basar | corporeal body, then Peter and Paul were not only wrong, their religion crumbles with this basar | pronouncement.
As discussed previously, basar speaks of a herald proclaiming the good news – something listeners should receive positively. During Dowd’s first of three lives, Shamuw’el was his Basar | Herald. Then came ‘Eythan, who scribed the 89th Mizmowr in Dowd’s honor. And while the prophets all spoke of him, Dowd would not be heralded again in the fashion of Basar until the emergence of Yada Yahowah two decades ago. The truth is now being told regarding what the Messiah volunteered to achieve on our behalf. And for the first time since he wrote these words 3,000 years ago, we are aware of the service Dowd’s basar | corporeal body afforded in the fulfillment of Passover. Thank you.
What we have just witnessed in Peter’s and Luke’s words is how the Christian New Testament deceives. By removing citations from their proper context, misquoting and misapplying them, the masters of Foolology tricked readers into believing things about “Jesus” which apply to Dowd | David. Robbing David to pay tribute to Jesus is among the most devastating crimes committed by religious men. As one of two steps underpinning the malignant myth of Replacement Theology, after replacing David with Jesus, they would substitute Gentiles for Jews.
Along these lines, the statement “I foresaw the Lord 549always before my face” will be extrapolated to convey something astonishingly sinister by the time we reach Acts 2:35. The bad boys of Christendom were just getting warmed up.
Also telling, Paul claimed that, by contrast, his faith was spiritual and thus better. He slathered ‘Abraham and Dowd with his errant Gnostic perceptions to make his point. Unfortunately for Paul, and those who foolishly believe he spoke for God, the flesh is not evil – religions are.
Should Dowd be correct regarding the flesh, and he was clearly inspired by Yah, then Paul, and his publicist, Luke, were not only wrong, they could not have been inspired by God. As is the case with everything in this debate, trust and reliance, indeed confidence, is a product of knowing and understanding insights such as this, while faith bridges the gap when a believer is ignorant and/or irrational. The reason Yahowah inspired Dowd to share this with us is so that we could replace one with the other and, like His prophet, be right.
Should someone hold the belief that the Messiah’s poem has been about something other than commending Yahowah and condemning Sha’uwl / Paul and the religion he, Peter, and Luke fathered, consider this, especially in light of Paul saying: “Now when David had served God’s purpose in his own generation, he fell asleep; he was buried with his ancestors and his body decayed.” (Acts 13:36) Methinks this proves that the principal author of the Christian New Testament deliberately lied…
“By way of contrast (ky – emphasizing this point while exposing the contrary position), You will not abandon Your association with (lo’ ‘azab – You will not neglect, reject, forsake, or desert, never releasing (qal imperfect)) my soul (nepesh ‘any – my consciousness, my inner person, character, and personality) with regard to 550Sha’uwl (la She’owl / la Sha’uwl – by approaching She’owl or on behalf of the goals of Sha’uwl), never allowing (lo’ nathan – never offering or giving, not permitting or surrendering (qal imperfect)) Your Set-Apart One (chasyd ‘atah – Your dedicated and loyal one, Your special and unique individual (adjective singular)) to see (ra’ah – to look upon, to experience, to gloat about, or to find pleasure in) corruption or degradation (shachath – what it is like to be corrupt or corrupted, useless or ruined, marred or blemished, dishonest exploitation or fraud, especially in association with the slimy dungeon and pit in which such corrupt and ruinous captives are destroyed).” (Mizmowr / Psalm 16:10)
What is particularly illuminating about this statement is that Sha’uwl (mis)quoted it as Divinely inspired, thereby acknowledging that it was true. And yet by misappropriating it for ‘Jesus,’ he revealed his depravity.
Paul went on to say… “So it is also stated elsewhere: ‘You will not let your holy one see decay.’” (Acts 13:35). Let’s never lose sight of the realization that Sha’uwl and She’owl are synonymous for a reason. One leads to the other.
Luke, aware of Paul’s twisted portrayal of Psalm 16, did his mentor proud and had “Peter” endorse the same myth… “‘Because thou wilt not leave my soul in hell, neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption.’” (Acts 2:27)
Or… “‘Because (hoti) my soul (psyche – consciousness) will not (ou) be utterly forsaken and totally abandoned (egkataleipo – be left behind and deserted) in Hades (hades – the abode of the dead). Neither (oude) will Your Set-Apart and Dedicated One (hosios – loyal and faithful, undefiled and pure) be allowed (didomi) to see (horao – experience) decay and decomposition (diaphthora).’” (Acts 2:27)
551The inference Peter, Paul, and Luke were making at Dowd’s expense, and those he could have saved, was that David’s body rotted in the grave while “Jesus” did not suffer that indignity. However, the prophecy was addressing Dowd’s soul, not Iesous’ body. Therefore, the authors of the Christian New Testament deliberately deceived the faithful to promote their religion.
It is so obvious that Dowd was speaking of himself and not a future Lord, that with every word, it’s apparent that Yahowah is seething over this travesty.
“You have made known to me (yada’ ‘any – You are my source of understanding, You reveal information and instruction to me, You enable me to be aware and perceptive such that I am acquainted with, reveal, and experience (hifil imperfect second-person masculine singular – You alone constantly and consistently equip and enable me to know and understand such that I become ever more like You)) the way to (‘orach – the path, manner, conduct, and route to travel which leads from this place to) life (chay – living a bountiful, blessed, favorable, and prosperous existence, nourished, restored, and renewed; from chayah – to live and remain alive, with life restored and sustained).
There is total satisfaction and contentment in the abundant (soba’ – there is complete and abounding) transcendent joy (simchah – sublime delight with an uplifting cheerful attitude, favorably entertaining the senses) associated with Your presence (‘eth paneh ‘atah – through Your appearance and in association with Your face). The pleasure of being accepted (na’ym – the benefits of being considered favorably and becoming acceptable, along with the melodious contentment and satisfaction) by being right with You (ba yamyn ‘atah – with my orientation on Your right side, with my right hand in Yours, and with me looking east in the morning toward You as the sun rises; from yaman – having chosen to be 552right) is glorious and forevermore (netsach – is splendid and unending, producing everlasting status and permanent prominence).” (Mizmowr / Psalm 16:11)
This, which was written by Dowd and of Dowd, is to be compared with this projection onto “Jesus”… “‘Thou hast made known to me the ways of life; thou shalt make me full of joy with thy countenance.’” (Acts 2:28)
Or literally… “‘Reveal and make known to (gnorizo – provide the information needed to understand and thereby expose to) me (ego) the way (hodos – path, road, and journey) to a complete and fulfilling (pleroo – full and abundant) life (zoe) of joy and gladness (euphrosyne – cheerfulness and gratitude) in proximity to (meta – in association with) Your presence (prosopon).’” (Acts 2: 28)
To accept Yah is to be right. To know Yah is to live. To be with Yahowah is to be joyous, satisfied, and content. We would have to search long and hard to find a more fitting proclamation to refute the likes of Peter, Paul, and Luke.
One of two things is true: Shim’own agreed with Sha’uwl and wrongly attributed something Dowd wrote about himself and his relationship with Yahowah, and projected it onto Iesou, or Luke, Paul’s apologist and propagandist, put these words in “Peter’s” mouth to support his mentor. And if you are wondering who to blame for this deliberate and debilitating deception, you may want to consider who wrote it.
Our excursion into the bowels of the Christian New Testament has thus far provided nothing to suggest that the Towrah’s presentation of the Shabuw’ah Harvest was fulfilled two thousand years early. And yet by considering how its authors convoluted Yahowah’s intent by misquoting Him, we have learned a great deal about the religion Peter, Paul, and Luke perpetrated to rob Jews of 553their rights and responsibilities, beginning with Dowd.
While it is both awkward and disingenuous, Luke is now reinforcing one of Paul’s most ludicrous arguments by placing it in the mouth of his rival, Peter. Does anyone believe that repeating the derogatory assessment of Dowd makes Jesus great?
“Gentlemen (andros), brothers (adelphos), it is possible (exesti – permissible and obligatory) after all to say (eipon – based on this account) to you in open public discourse, enjoying freedom of speech (parresia – without any concern or fear) with regard to (pros) and concerning (peri) the patriarch (patriaches – founder and forefather) David (ΔΔ – placeholder for Dauid, a Greek transliteration for Dowd), that (hoti) he both died (teleutao – his life is finished and has come to a close) and was buried (thapto), and his tomb (mnema – grave) exists (eimi – and can be identified) among (en) us, even until (achri) this (houtos) day (hemera). (Acts 2:29)
Being (hyparcho) therefore (oun) a prophet (prophetes), and knowing (oida) that (hoti) Theos (ΘΣ) swore (omnuo) an oath (horkos) that from out (ek) of the fruit (darpos) of his loins (osphys), would sit (kathizo) upon (epi) His (autos) throne (thronos), he foresaw (proorao) and spoke (laleo) about (peri) the rising up and standing upright (anastasis) of the Christon (ΧΡΝ – placeholder for Christon, which became Christ), because namely (hoti), He was not (oute) left behind and abandoned so as to remain (egkataleipo – forsaken and deserted) at (eis – inside and within) Hades (hades – the abode of the dead), nor (oute) did His flesh (sarx – physical human body) see (horao – experience) decay and decomposition (diaphthora – corruption).” (Acts 2:30-31)
The coconspirators of Christianity were overtly committed to killing and burying “David.” And while this enables Replacement Foolology, there is nothing in all the 554universe they could have said more irritating to his Father – who just so happens to be God.
This is Paul’s plot, one which Luke advanced by ascribing it to Peter. But every aspect of it is a lie – from the details to its sweeping implications.
Ignoring what Dowd revealed, only to extract something he could kephash | bend, Peter misappropriated a prophecy affirming that Dowd would serve Yahowah by fulfilling Chag Matsah and live forevermore in God’s presence. He misappropriated God’s testimony so that an imaginary character drawn out of pagan mythology and given a fictitious name could replace the Messiah. By errantly claiming that Dowd was dead and buried in a prophecy which says the opposite, his goal was to transfer what was said about the King, including his title and throne, to his false god. This perverted patriarch of Christendom engendered eternal damnation because he fooled billions of souls while establishing a religion that would persecute Jews. To Hell with Peter.
I’ve shared this previously, but now that we are evaluating the entirety of Peter’s errant portrayal of Shabuw’ah, Dowd, and Iesou, it bears repeating that the odds against Peter and Paul, who were irreconcilable and bitter foes, promoting the same lie in their first public addresses by misappropriating the same otherwise obscure verse from a Psalm to rob and bury Dowd, first in Acts 2 and then in Acts 13 is incalculable. They stole lyrics Dowd wrote to Yahowah affirming that God would never allow his body to fail, his soul to die, or his fate to be negated by Sha’uwl, to not only claim the opposite, but to justify applying the prophecy to “Jesus.” They did so because they could not find any which actually spoke of their mythical misnomer. The fact that Christian scholars haven’t shown the integrity to admit the obvious – that this means the myth of Christ and the allure of Christianity were built on an elaborate hoax that is neither credible nor accurate, is a 555blight on their reputations.
This isn’t a minor issue that can be swept aside as a figure of speech. It is an outright inversion of the Psalm designed to dismiss Dowd such that his titles, accolades, and accomplishments could be misappropriated to create the false impression that their Iesou was the Christou, and that Theos had predicted his every move. It was all a lie.
As a consequence of these deliberate deceptions and falsifications, billions have been deprived of what Dowd achieved for us. Truths vital to our wellbeing were buried under the grotesque contention that there was a Jesus Christ, a man-god, who was killed by Jews so that Christians could replace them and live. As a result, religious Jews countered with a false Messiah of their own – a miscalculation which led to the Diaspora and the Holocaust.
Even if we focus on the smaller picture drawn from Peter’s false declaration, by deliberately misrepresenting the prophetic portrait painted by the Son of God, Roman Catholicism’s first Pope demonstrated that he should never be trusted. He would lie about anything and everything to create and promote the illusion of Jesus Christ – apart from which he is nothing.
Peter’s, Paul’s, and Luke’s argument was predicated on a false premise and backed by a misquoted and misappropriated citation. And this is just in the hypothesis stage of their delusion. The prophecy in Shamuw’el / 2 Samuel 7, to which Peter and Luke are alluding, does not predict the arrival of a Messiah who would be known as Christon | Christ. It does not speak of “Jesus.” Instead, just like the misappropriated 16th Psalm, 2 Samuel 7 is all about Dowd | David – and only the Beloved from beginning to end.
This sweeping prophecy opens with Yahowah explicitly speaking to Dowd and then it concludes with 556God directly addressing Dowd once again. In between, Yahowah speaks to us about Dowd. Other than the conduit of this proclamation, Nathan, and the one offering it, Yahowah, no other names are mentioned.
“It came to pass (wa hayah ky) when the king sat down and relaxed in his home (ha melek yashab ba beyth huw’) because Yahowah (wa YaHoWaH) had given him a comforting respite (nuwach la huw’) from his adversaries and rancorous foes (min sabyb min kol ‘oyeb huw’), (Shamuw’el 2 7:1) that the king said (wa ‘amar ha melek) to Nathan, the prophet (‘el Nathan ha naby’), ‘Please look around (ra’ah na’). I live (‘anoky yashab) in a house of cedar (ba beyth ‘erez), but the Ark of God (wa ‘arown ha ‘elohym) sits within curtains (yashab ba tawek ha yarya’ah).’ (Shamuw’el 2 7:2)
So, Nathan said to the king (wa ‘amar Nathan ‘el ha melek), ‘Choose to go and do all that is in your best judgment (kol ‘asher ba lebab ‘atah) because, surely (ky), Yahowah is with you (Yahowah ‘im ‘atah).’ (Shamuw’el 2 7:3)
However, that evening (wa hayah ba ha laylah ha huw’), the word of Yahowah came to Nathan (dabar Yahowah hayah ‘el Nathan). He conveyed (la ‘amar), (Shamuw’el 2 7:4) ‘Go and tell (halak wa ‘amar ‘el) Dowd, My coworker (Dowd ‘ebed ‘any), that this is what Yahowah says (koh Yahowah ‘amar). “Why should you build Me a home to live in (ha ‘atah banah la ‘any beyth la yashab ‘any)? (Shamuw’el 2 7:5)
Indeed (ky), I have not lived (lo’ yashab) in a house (ba beyth) since the time (wa min yowm) that I lifted up to be with Me (‘alah ‘any ‘eth) the Children of Yisra’el (beny Yisra’el) out of the crucibles of oppression in Mitsraym (min Mitsraym). Then, as an ongoing witness to the restoring testimony, up to (wa ‘ad) this day (ha yowm ha zeh), I have been moving about (wa hayah 557halak) in a tent dwelling as a tabernacle and home (ba ‘ohel wa ba mishkan). (Shamuw’el 2 7:6)
During any of that time, when showing the way to the benefits of the relationship, that (ba kol ‘asher) I traveled (halak) with all of the Children of Yisra’el (ba kol beny Yisra’el), did I say a single word (ha dabar dabar) to one (‘eth ‘echad) of the leaders of the tribes of Yisra’el (shebet Yisra’el), whom I instructed (‘asher tsawah) to shepherd (la ra’ah) My people (‘eth ‘am ‘any), Yisra’el (Yisra’el), to say (la ‘amar), “So why not (la mah lo’) build for Me a house of cedar (banah la ‘any beyth ‘erez)? (Shamuw’el 2 7:7)
Now, therefore (wa ‘atah), this is what you should say (koh ‘amar) to My associate, Dowd (la ‘ebed ‘any la Dowd), as a result (koh), Yahowah of the spiritual implements (Yahowah tsaba’) says (‘amar), “I took you (‘any laqach ‘atah) from the sheepfolds (min ha neweh), from chasing after lambs (min ‘achar ha tso’n), to be the conspicuous and informative leader (la hayah nagyd) among My People (‘al ‘am ‘any), over Yisra’el (‘al Yisra’el). (Shamuw’el 2 7:8)
I have been with you (wa hayah ‘im ‘atah) throughout it all (ba kol) revealing the benefits of the relationship (‘asher) as you journeyed through life (halak). I have cut off (wa karat), accordingly, all of your enemies (‘eth kol ‘oyeb ‘atah) from your presence (min paneh ‘atah). And I have engaged on your behalf to make for you (wa ‘asah la ‘atah) an exceptionally important name, the greatest designation, and the most distinguished reputation (shem ha gadowl), when compared to the most glorified designations (ka shem ha gadowl) pursuant to the relationship (‘asher) on the Earth (ba ha ‘erets). (Shamuw’el 2 7:9)
Furthermore (wa), I will appoint and establish (sym) a dwelling place (maqowm) for My People (la ‘am 558‘any), Yisra’el (la Yisra’el). I will plant them (wa nata’ huw’) such that they may abide (wa shakan) below throughout a less chaotic time than this (tachath huw’) and no longer be agitated, anguished, or terrorized (ragaz ‘owd). They will not continue to be (wa lo’ yasaph) afflicted or degraded, disparaged or denigrated (‘anah), by unjust and harmful sons, perverted and violent descendants of evil (beny ‘awlah), as will have formerly been the case (ka ‘asher ba ha ri’shown). (Shamuw’el 2 7:10)
From the day (wa la min ha yowm) which, for the benefit of the relationship (‘asher), I appointed and instructed (tsawah) Judges (shaphat) on behalf of My people (‘al ‘am ‘any), Yisra’el (Yisra’el), I will provide a respite (wa nuwach la ‘atah) from all of your enemies (min kol ‘oyeb ‘atah). In addition (wa), Yahowah (Yahowah) is boldly and publicly announcing to you (nagad la ‘atah) that, indeed (ky), He will act, engaging with you to create the family and home of Yahowah (beyth ‘asah la ‘atah Yahowah).” (Shamuw’el 2 7:11)
Yahowah has been addressing the future restoration of His people, recognizing that soon, they will no longer be abused by Progressives, Muslims, or Christians. He affirmed that He engaged with Dowd to build His family and create his home. God is announcing that He and His Son would fulfill the Invitations to be Called Out and Meet together, enabling the benefits of the Beryth.
Dowd would inspire love for Yahowah by living two additional lives, each exceedingly beneficial. And while it is uncommon for a soul to be bestowed three lives, every Covenant member will enjoy two. And like Dowd, the two Witnesses will live three lives, with the shortest of the three not only being of service to others but also of similar length to Dowd’s return to fulfill Pesach, Matsah, and Bikuwrym – which was likely three to four years.
559“Surely (ky), your time will be thoroughly proclaimed and completely fulfilled (male’ yowmym ‘atah). When you will have laid down your life (wa shakab) in association with your ancestors (‘eth ‘ab ‘atah), I will rise up and take a stand to bring to fruition (quwm) with your seed what you have sown (‘eth zera’ ‘atah), something more in the end without hesitation for you (‘achar ‘atah). For the benefit of the relationship (‘asher), it will be extracted and withdrawn (yatsa’) out of a small particle of your physiological nature (min me’eh).” (Shamuw’el 2 7:12)
I am interrupting the flow of this prophecy regarding Dowd because I want you to appreciate something few realize. The verb male’ was scribed in the imperfect conjugation, so it cannot be addressing something which is over, such as Dowd’s previous existence. Instead, in the imperfect, male’ speaks of ongoing fulfillments – thereby addressing Dowd’s eternal reign as King after having fulfilled the seven Mow'edym | Eternal Witnesses to the Appointed Meeting Times.
After Dowd’s relaxing intermission between the three phases of his life, with shakab scribed in the perfect conjugation, it is indicating that his rest would be for a limited time and soon will be over. Yahowah is going to intervene a third time in the course of His Son’s lives to quwm ‘eth zera’ | establish what Dowd has sown. Zera’ speaks of seeds which, when sown, take root and grow, producing a productive harvest if properly cultivated. It serves as a metaphor for the tens of thousands of thoughtful words this man wrote on our behalf and the many meaningful things he achieved. As the Zarowa’ (a title that is based upon zera’), Dowd spread the seeds of Chag Matsah such that his sacrifice will bear fruit during the Harvests of Taruw’ah and Kipurym.
Yahowah is not doing this “after” Dowd but instead “without hesitating or delaying, and without equivocating.” 560Such is the primary meaning of ‘achar, derived from its verbal root.
Further, it was ‘asher which brought me to this place, and to this prophecy, helping me better understand the nature of the family Yahowah is striving to achieve – much of which is correctly conveyed in the Father and Son relationship He developed with Dowd. More than anyone who ever lived, the Messiah embodies “‘asher – showing the way to the benefits of the relationship.”
Yatsa’ is the operative term of the “Exodus.” It means “to withdraw, to extract, and to deliver.” It does not speak of a man’s seed, in the sense of sperm emanating from a man. Equally revealing, the primary meaning of ma’al is not “viscera or loins,” but instead, it describes “a minute, exceedingly small, particle which comprises something much larger.” That particle is Dowd’s DNA.
Dowd’s lives and lyrics have been thoroughly proclaimed and the promises made through them have been or soon will be fulfilled. His first life was just the beginning. He would be brought back twice more based on what he has sown for our edification.
Even after fulfilling Passover, UnYeasted Bread, and Firstborn Children in year 6000 Yah / 33 CE, Yahowah is going to take another triumphant stand with His Son and on behalf of the Covenant.
So now after foreshadowing what will occur, Yahowah began to speak to us about His Son. And while this approach is common throughout the Prophets, even if God intended to transition away from speaking to Dowd to addressing his heir, his son was Shalomoh | Solomon, not Gospel Jesus. And since Solomon was next on the throne, why would Yahowah mention this when succession was commonplace and assumed?
Therefore, either Yahowah was continuing to be 561prophetic and profound, telling us what He was going to achieve through Dowd, or God went from prophetic and profound to mundane to tell him that his son would be next to occupy Yisra’el’s throne. With this in mind, especially in this profoundly important narrative, the answer seems obvious…
“‘And so (wa), I will establish (kuwn) his reign over his kingdom (‘eth mamlakah huw’).’” (Shamuw’el 2 7:12)
Dowd’s reappearance as King will be manifest, not only through the redeployment of his nepesh | soul, but also by reconstituting his DNA for the third time. This manifestation of the Messiah will adroitly convey Dowd’s authority, personality, and appearance. The returning Messiah, the Son of God, and the King of Kings, is, therefore, fully and completely Dowd. And that is why Yahowah is now speaking of him to us, telling us what they will accomplish together…
“He, himself, shall restore and rebuild (huw’ banah) the family home (beyth) for (la) My name (shem ‘any). And (wa) I will prepare and establish (kuwn) the throne (‘eth kise’) of his kingdom (mamlakah huw’) forevermore as a continuing witness (‘ad ‘owlam). (Shamuw’el 2 7:13)
I was, I am, and I always will be (‘any hayah) for him (la huw’) as a Father (la ‘ab), and (wa) he was, is, and always will be (huw’ hayah) for Me as (la ‘any) a son (la ben).” (Shamuw’el 2 7:14 in part)
It’s true that Shalomoh built the Covenant Home of Yahowah on the Temple Mount that Dowd acquired and with the materials his father had accumulated. But Solomon got distracted, and trying to please the many foreign women he had brought into his harem, his reign ended poorly. Israel would be shattered, breaking into pieces and destroyed within a decade of his turbulent time on the throne. Therefore, his kingdom was not everlasting. 562This claim can only be made of one man – Dowd – because he is returning to reign forevermore.
Reminding us that he was still addressing Dowd, the King was the only man Yahowah referred to as His Son, doing so three times. Therefore, it is obvious that the only transition has been from Yahowah speaking directly to His Son to talking to us about him. And as a result, to claim this prophetic pronouncement on behalf of the mythical misnomer Jesus is nothing short of identity theft. It applies to the greatest man who ever lived, Yahowah’s Chosen One and Firstborn, the Messiah and King, Dowd, and not to a fable.
And yet, that is exactly what Peter, Paul, and Luke were implying by misappropriating Yahowah’s promise to Dowd, and to us through him, and donating it to Iesou Christou. I can assure you that Christianity’s coconspirators will be convicted of this crime and suffer the consequence – which is an eternity in She’owl.
Speaking to us about His beloved Son, Yahowah specifically warned His people that the likes of Peter, Paul, and pals would misappropriate and corrupt almost everything He said of him…
“So when that which is associated with him is warped and perverted, twisted such that it is contrary to what has been stated (‘asher ba ‘awah huw’), I will resolve the dispute against him, vindicating him, deciding with him to expose and issue a condemnation (wa yakah huw’) against the weapons and staves wielded by rulers of the nations (ba shebet) of men (‘ishym) and against (wa ba) the fungus and plague that has fallen (nega’) upon the descendants (ben) of ‘Adam (‘adam).’” (Shamuw’el 2 7:14)
Fathers are protective of their children, and they will not tolerate those who seek to ruin their relationships. So, when the consequence results in a deadly plague and the 563spread of religious fungus, there will be recompense. And yet, just like Paul citing the prophecy in Habakkuk which condemned him, Peter did the same thing by pilfering this Divine narrative regarding Dowd. It is, therefore, embarrassing that there hasn’t been a single scholar who was capable of pointing out the obvious.
Yahowah’s declaration explains why He opposes the religious charade transferring the promises He made to the Messiah to create a Christ. God’s not a believer…
“‘Therefore (wa), My steadfast devotion, enduring love, commitment to the relationship, and unmitigated favor (chesed ‘any) will not be removed from him, be disassociated or diminished regarding him, or replaced, substituting another for him (lo’ suwr min huw’) as was the case when (ka ‘asher) I turned away from and completely rejected (suwr min) associating with (‘im) Sha’uwl (Sha’uwl) whom, to show the proper way (‘asher), I removed (suwr) from your presence (min la paneh ‘atah).’” (Shamuw’el 2 7:15)
Unlike most people, Yahowah is loyal, and His love is enduring. He is eternally committed to the Covenant Family. This is especially so regarding His Son, our King, Dowd.
While everything was stolen from him to create the mythology of Christianity, having done so comes with a strong rebuke from God. Yahowah even condemns the primary culprit by name – Sha’uwl. Just as Dowd’s initial nemesis was disavowed, demon-possessed, and perished apart from the people, the same was true of the Sha’uwl known to Christians as Paul. And while he died separated, rejected, and alone, in the final condemnation, all traces of his religion will be expunged from the Earth.
Speaking directly to Dowd again, and thus to us through him, God concludes…
564“‘And so (wa), your family (beyth ‘atah) and (wa) your position of authority, your kingdom and reign (malakah ‘atah), are assured, as it is trustworthy and dependable, firmly established, credible, and enduring (‘aman) forever as a continuing witness (‘ad ‘owlam) in My presence (la paneh ‘atah). Your throne and seat of honor (kise’ ‘atah) will be (hayah) established and sustained (kuwn) forevermore as restoring testimony (‘ad ‘owlam).’ (Shamuw’el 2 7:16)
Consistent with all of these words (ka kol ha dabarym ha ‘eleh) and in accord with (wa ka) the entire revelation (kol ha chizywon ha zeh), in this manner, Nathan accurately conveyed this (ken dabar Nathan) to Dowd (‘el Dowd).” (Shamuw’el / Listen to Him / 2 Samuel 7:17)
This prophecy has been about houses, who builds them and who lives in them. It is about Dowd, who had a home, not “Jesus” who was homeless throughout the myths conceived about him. Its focus has been on what God is going to do for, with, and through His beloved Son. It is also about seeds and thrones, who sows them and who sits upon them. As such, the three so-called Abrahamic religions predicated on false messiahs – Christianity, Judaism, and Islam – should have been vociferously renounced in their infancy and never have been allowed to grow.
Those adept at changing names, who actually made a religion out of doing so, Peter, Paul, and pals, replaced Dowd’s name with Iesou / Jesus in a desperate attempt to make their counterfeit appear divine. Foolology became part and parcel of Christianity. It was the first phase of replacements since the revisionists would go on to replace Jews with Christians.
Dowd | David, the individual being addressed, was robbed by Christians to create the illusion that their “Jesus” 565was the Messiah. That is why we find Yahowah coming to the defense of His Ben, ha Mashyach, our Yasha’ and returning Melek.
God chose a shepherd boy, a child chasing after sheep, to lead His people and enlighten the world. He did not choose a scholar, a theologian, an expert in linguistics, a star athlete, a social media celebrity, or a man with a proven record in politics or the military. That is not to suggest that the lad was without merit. He was brilliant and thoughtful, articulate and courageous, attributes Yahowah would cultivate over time. The result is the Mizmowr and Mashal | Psalms and Proverbs, even the fulfillment of the Mow’edym | Restoring Witnesses of the Eternal Testimony.
Yahowah is constantly reminding us that He is focused on Yisra’el. The descendants of Ya’aqob are His people. This has not and will not change. There is no room for a Gentile Church.
Dowd established a united Yisra’el in the Promised Land, incorporating Yaruwshalaim as his home. So, when Yahowah promised to “appoint a place for My people, Yisra’el, planting them there such that they will never have to move again,” He was addressing a time nearly 3,000 years removed from this discussion.
After having fulfilled Pesach and Matsah leading to Bikuwrym, Dowd will return on Kipurym, this time to serve as the King of Kings. All the Psalmist has sown will come to fruition. His will be the place of honor as it is his witness that makes him the most deserving candidate.
As a proud Father, Yahowah will hold those who have robbed His Son of this dignity accountable. He will chastise those who have perverted and twisted the promises He has made to His Beloved by perverting this prophecy. Second only to the embezzlement of His name by religious Jews, this crime irks the Almighty more than any other.
566And therefore, this has been appalling to the Almighty…
“Israelite (Israelites) men (andros), listen to (akouo) these words (logos): Iesou (ΙΝΥ – placeholder for Iesou which became Jesus in the 17th century) the Nazarene (Nazoraios), is a man (andros) who publicly demonstrated (apodeiknymi) to (eis) you (sy) that he is from (apo) Theos (ΘΣ – placeholder for theos – god) using supernatural powers and abilities (dynamis) to perform extraordinary miracles with prophetic significance (teras). These are signs (semeion) which (hos) Theos | God (ΘΣ) performed (poieomai) through (dia) him (autos) in your midst (mesos) as (kathos) you know (oida). (Acts 2:22)
He was appointed to (horizo) the prearranged and prophetic (prognosis) plan and purpose (boule) of Theos (ΘΣ), he was betrayed and given over (ekdotos) to (dia) the hand (cheir) of the Towrahless (anomos) who chose to take control and lift him up (anaireo), affixing him (prospegnumi). (Acts 2:23)
Theos (ΘΩ) restored him to life and raised him (anistamai), releasing and dismissing him (lou) from the suffering and pain (odin) of death (thanatos) because (kathoti) it was not (ou) possible (dynatos) for him to exist (eimi) held and influenced (krateo) by (hypo) these things. (Acts 2:24)
For (gar – because) David (ΔΔ – a placeholder for Dowd using the Greek transliteration Dauid) said (lego) of (eis) him (autos), ‘I foresee (proorao) the Kurios | Lord (ΚΩ) in front of (enopion) me (ego) always (pas) on my behalf (dia) because (hoti) from (ek – out of) his right hand (dexios) I will not be (me eimi) shaken or swayed (saleuomai). (Acts 2:25)
Therefore (dia), my heart (kardia) rejoices (euphrainomai), and my tongue (glossa) delights 567(agalliao) that also (eti) my flesh (sarkos) will abide and endure (kataskenoo) as a result of (epi) a confident and trusting expectation (elpis). (Acts 2:26)
Because (hoti) my soul (psyche) will not (ou) be utterly forsaken and totally abandoned (egkataleipo) in Hades (hades). Neither (oude) will Your Holy One (hosios) be allowed (didomi) to see (horao) decay and decomposition (diaphthora). (Acts 2:27)
Reveal and make known to (gnorizo) me (ego) the way (hodos) to a complete (pleroo) life (zoe) of joy and gladness (euphrosyne) in proximity to (meta) Your presence (prosopon).’ (Acts 2:28)
Gentlemen (andros), brothers (adelphos), it is possible (exesti) after all to say (eipon) to you in open public discourse, enjoying freedom of speech (parresia) with regard to (pros) and concerning (peri) the patriarch (patriaches) David (ΔΔ – placeholder for Dauid, a Greek transliteration for Dowd), that (hoti) he both died (teleutao) and was buried (thapto), and his tomb (mnema) exists (eimi) among (en) us, even until (achri) this (houtos) day (hemera). (Acts 2:29)
“Being (hyparcho) therefore (oun) a prophet (prophetes), and knowing (oida) that (hoti) Theos | God (ΘΣ) swore (omnuo) an oath (horkos) that from out (ek) of the fruit (darpos) of his loins (osphys), would sit (kathizo) upon (epi) His (autos) throne (thronos), he foresaw (proorao) and spoke (laleo) about (peri) the rising up and standing upright (anastasis) of the Christon (ΧΡΝ – placeholder for Christon, which became Christ), because namely (hoti), he was not (oute) left behind and abandoned so as to remain (egkataleipo) at (eis) Hades (hades), nor (oute) did his flesh (sarx) see (horao) decomposition (diaphthora).” (Acts 2:30-31)
Peter, Paul, and Luke concocted this malicious and malignant medley to take what was said of Dowd and apply 568it to Iesou Christon | Jesus Christ. They were thieves. All it took was some errant citations misappropriated from the Prophets to do away with Dowd so that Iesou could bear his credentials. In this way, with these words, the myth of Replacement Foolology was forged. And all who believed them died.
Since he lied through his teeth up to this point, why would anyone believe him now?
“This Iesoun (ΙΝ – placeholder for Iesoun – Jesus) whom Theos (ΘΣ – placeholder for theos – god) raised up (anistamai – caused to be restored to life and stand upright), which all (pas) of us exist as (eimi) witnesses (martyros – spectators and observers who can testify based upon their experience), therefore (oun) is the right hand (dexia – the authority and power) of Theos (ΘΥ), lifted up and exalted (hypsoo).
He also (te) promised (epangelia) the Holy (hagion) Pneuma (ΠΝΣ – placeholder for pneuma – spirit) who is received and acquired (lambano) from (para) the Pater (ΠΡΣ – placeholder for pater – father), which (hos) you all (sou) have also (kai) seen (blepo) and heard (akouo).” (Acts 2:32-33)
There was no one named “Iesoun” in 1st-century Judea. The person being crudely counterfeited is Dowd. God has a name, but these shysters didn’t know it.
The body of the Passover Lamb was bludgeoned, discarded, and incinerated. The Pesach ‘Ayil never comes back to life – as that would be ridiculous and defeat its purpose.
No one in this alleged audience was a witness to a risen Iesoun. Fact is, those allegedly exposed to the handful of brief post-Bikuwrym sightings of Gospel Jesus shared one thing in common – no one recognized him. And that completely negates the claim that “all of us exist as 569witnesses.”
Further, Dowd, as the Right Hand of God, was ignored, disregarded, demeaned, rejected, and replaced, which is the antithesis of “being lifted up and exalted.”
The Messiah was not “promised the Holy Spirit.” The Ruwach Qodesh | Set-Apart Spirit of Yahowah came upon him when he was anointed ha Mashyach at eight years of age and never left him. And as for making such a promise, nothing of the sort is found in Dowd’s Mizmowr or Mashal. She isn’t Dowd’s to give. And She is the antithesis of holy | diseased.
By claiming that “the Pater” is the source of “hagion pneuma,” Peter is displaying his ignorance. The Ruwach Qodesh is the Maternal manifestation of Yahowah’s nature – not Paternal. Moreover, no man has seen the Ruwach Qodesh – adding to Peter’s litany of lies. I do not think that he could have messed this up any worse, even if that had been his intent.
The Ruwach Qodesh | Set-Apart Spirit is, as Her title denotes, “set apart” from Yahowah. She is part of God projected into our frame of reference and represents the feminine and maternal aspects of Yahowah’s nature. She is not, however, a separate “person” or involved in religion.
The Greek hagiazo, which is typically rendered as “holy,” denotes religious implications. In addition to the “Holy Ghost,” Christianity sports a “Holy Catholic Church,” “Holy Bible,” a “Holy Father,” the “Holy See,” a “Holy Mother,” the “Holy One,” a “Holy Trinity,” “Holy Water,” “Holy Baptism,” and the “Holy Grail,” in addition to “Holy Communion” to name a few – even a “Holy of Holies” and “Holy War” fought over the “Holy Land.” They even celebrate “Halloween.” The New World Encyclopedia states: “The word Holy denotes the presence of sacredness in an object, being, person, place, or idea. It can also indicate an experience of numinosity – all-570inspiring and imbued with sacredness. It is often ascribed to saints, gurus, times, or places.” Thomas Aquinas defined holiness “as a virtue by which man’s mind applies itself and all its acts to God.”
The origin of the word “holy” comes from the 11th-century Old German hulis and Old English holegn meaning “Holly” as in the Holly Tree – considered a sacred plant to both pre-Christian Celtic and Roman worship. “To hold holy” became “to be holy,” and then “to make holy,” as in “to sanctify.”
The concept of being “set apart” is as central to the Covenant as religious notions like holy are opposed to it. At best, “holy” conceals and corrupts this message, and it replaces God’s terminology with man’s. Worse, it applies attributes to saints, objects, relics, and the Spirit which are completely inaccurate.
But the story gets darker because holy has a satanic past. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, “holy” was “originally used to venerate heathen deities in Old Norse.” In the Dictionary of Mythology, Folklore and Symbols, “holy in practically all languages was derived from the divinely honored sun.” Forlong’s Encyclopedia of Religions says: “Holi is the Great Hindu spring festival held in honor of Krishna as the spring sun-god…and a personified woman called Holi.”
Heilei, which is the German pronunciation of holy, means “sun’s ray” and “halo” – combining the religious and scientific symbols for the sun god and man. It is then little wonder religious types are wont to place these pagan images over the heads of their “saints.” As confirmation of this, J.C. Cooper in his Illustrated Encyclopedia of Traditional Symbols, writes: “Nimbus (a halo around a saint’s head replete with a sunburst), Halo, and Aureole (a heavenly crown of radiant light or corona worn by saints) were originally indicative of solar power and of the sun’s 571disk, and hence display an attribute of sun-gods.”
Since so many of man’s religious words, such as “church,” which is an adaptation of Circe (pronounced similarly to church, representing the sun goddess who was the daughter of Helios), come from Germanic sources, it is instructive to know that heilei and heilig, the German equivalent of holy, were derived from Heil. In Bell’s New Pantheon, “Heil was a Saxon (Prussian and North Germanic) idol.” So it is safe to say that at best, “holy” is wrong in that it misses the point, and at worst, “holy” leads us in the wrong direction.
The closest Hebrew word, holy / choly, means “severe plague and chronic sickness.” As a Jew, fluent in Hebrew, Peter should have known better, even if Luke didn’t.
Peter would have us believe that the Beloved Son of God, the Messiah, the past and future King of Israel, Yahowah’s Firstborn and Chosen One, His Shepherd and the Branch, the great Prophet and Psalmist, did not get into heaven. If so, then the doors are forever sealed…
“For (gar – indeed) David (ΔΔ – placeholder for the Greek transliteration Dauid), did not (ou) ascend (anabaino – rise and go up) to (eis) heaven (ouranos), but (de) himself (autos) said (lego), ‘Said (eipon) Lord (ΚΣ – placeholder for kurios – lord): My (ego) Lord (ΚΩ – placeholder for kurio – lord) sits and resides (kathemai – lives and remains) out of (ek) My (ego) right side (dexios – right hand of power and authority) (Acts 2:34) until (hoes) I put (tithemi) your enemies (echthros) as a footstool (hypopodion) for your feet (podos).’” (Acts 2:35)
The initial declaration that – “David did not ascend to heaven” – is so far from the truth, so insulting to Yahowah, so demeaning of His Beloved Son, so negating of the Covenant, and so dismissive of the Mow’ed Miqra’ey, by stating it publicly, Peter, Luke, and his spiritual advisor, 572Paul, have earned their incarceration in She’owl | Hell. And from this juncture into oblivion, the Church has opined that “the Lord speaking of my Lord” proves that there are multiple persons in the “godhead” and that the unnamed “Jesus” must be in heaven instead of David. Stupid is as stupid says.
Just for our entertainment, I would ask those promoting these lies: If we are to suppose that Dowd is speaking in the first person in his Psalm, who is it that is saying “until I put your enemies as a footstool for your feet?” With Dowd as the speaker rather than the subject of the Psalm, wouldn’t that make “Dauid” more powerful than “the Lord?”
Tell me, how is it that the full cadre of Christian theologians over this vast chasm of time have not been able to admit the conclusion of the sentence negates any possibility that it was spoken by “David” of “Jesus?” Are they all complete ignoramuses or is their problem a total lack of integrity?
We have more copies of the Psalms extant among the Dead Sea Scrolls than any other Divinely inspired text, more scrolls even than the Towrah or of Isaiah. Unfortunately, the citation now being misappropriated is from Psalm 110, and it is not among them. At issue is the use of ‘adony | my lord after and before Yahowah’s name, in addition to the realization that the entire Psalm was written in Yahowah’s voice. In it, God addresses His subject in second and third person. This is to say that Yahowah is speaking to this individual and then of him, similar to what we witnessed in Shamuw’el / 2 Samuel 7.
This known, the Psalm was written about Dowd, not by Dowd – as is the case with the magnificent 89th Mizmowr. Therefore, the introductory line in Acts 2, “but he, himself, said…” is a false assumption since the Psalm was scribed about Dowd and since almost every statement 573is consistent with what Yahowah has said of him and no one else.
“A psalm (mizmowr – a poetic song with melody and words) regarding (la – about, concerning the approach of, and to) Dowd (Dowd – the Beloved).”
Using the primary meaning of the preposition, la | to, the mystery of the Psalm is resolved. It is not Dowd, himself, who is saying…, but is instead what Yahowah is saying about Dowd.
Based upon the Masoretic Text, the Mizmowr reads:
“Yahowah (Yahowah) prophetically announces in advance of it occurring (na’um) concerning (la – regarding and about the approach of, or to) my Lord and my Upright One (‘adony / ‘edony – my master and authority figure used as a sign of respect by someone looking up to another individual, or my foundation and support upon which I stand): ‘You have chosen of your own accord to actually dwell (yashab – under the auspices of freewill, you have decided to genuinely live and remain (qal imperative – a genuine expression of volition in the second person)) at (la – near and by) My right side (yamyn ‘any – My right hand with My power and authority) as an eternal witness (‘ad – continuously and forever, into perpetuity as a source of testimony).
I will place (syth – I will set (qal imperfect)) your enemies and those who discount you (‘oyab ‘atah – your foes who are openly hostile to your status and opposed to your position, displaying animus and rancor toward you) as (la) your foot (regel ‘atah) stool (hadom – a piece of furniture to rest one’s feet; from an unused root meaning to stamp upon).’” (Mizmowr / Song / Psalm 110:1)
This was written by a prophet, perhaps the aforementioned Nathan, to reveal what Yahowah said to him regarding this individual, whom the prophet calls 574either ‘adony | my lord or ‘edony | my upright one. Both distinctions were common and appropriate as titles when used to address a person of considerable status, like a king, whom the writer knows and respects.
However, not only would it be inappropriate to call Yahowah “my Lord,” this is not Yahowah speaking at this point. We know this to be the case because there is no situation where God would refer to anyone as “My Lord.” Further, there would have been no one at the time this was written who would have known the fabulous Gospel Jesus or who could have spoken of him as ‘my Anything.’ Even beyond these realizations, we should also acknowledge that all but one word of what follows pertains to Dowd and nothing is applicable to the myth of Gospel Jesus.
And if I may point out the obvious, the psalmist has already identified “my lord.” The introduction reads: “A psalm (mizmowr) about, concerning, and to (la) Dowd (Dowd).”
Recognizing that Dowd’s reconstituted basar | corporeal body and nepesh | consciousness were deployed to enable the promises associated with Pesach, Matsah, and Bikuwrym, the Christian premise unravels. It would have Yahowah predicting that His soul decided independently of Himself to live at His right side. Even if it were possible, there would be no reason to predict such a thing. And, of course, it still wouldn’t be applicable to Jesus.
While God has freewill, Yahowah is speaking of another, not Himself. And the one person who has made it abundantly clear that he has chosen to live with Yah is Dowd. And not-so-coincidentally, he is the same person Yahowah has referred to as His Right Hand.
Gospel Jesus did not leave us with a single written word, and Dowd was the most prolific writer among Yahowah’s prophets. Dowd exemplifies “‘ad – an everlasting and eternal witness.”
575Even in the myths attributed to him, Gospel Jesus was never “‘oyab – discounted by those opposed to his position” but instead the opposite. He is afforded titles well beyond what was appropriate. By contrast, Dowd’s Psalms are replete with references to his enemies who have sought to negate his position with Yahowah.
Dowd is the only one being discredited by those besmirching him and ascribing undue status to the Christian counterfeit. Moreover, to claim that David is not in heaven is counter to everything that was written about him.
In the 89th Mizmowr, which is a tribute to Dowd, he is presented as the Right Hand and Son of God, as the Shepherd and the Messiah, even as the King who is returning to vanquish Yisra’el’s foes. And this passage in Acts 2 is one of many which point directly toward what Christians have done to rob Dowd of his impressive resume. So even at this early point, we know that this is not something being said by Dowd or about Gospel Jesus, but said about Dowd, thus negating Peter’s statement and Luke’s assessment on behalf of Paul.
When we compare Luke’s positioning of this prophetic declaration with Yahowah’s presentation of it, an observant and rational reader immediately recognizes that the misquoted statement provides no evidence to demonstrate any of Luke’s assertions – while it contains considerable proof to discredit them. While his rendition shares some words in common to fool the unwary, the Psalm does not infer that “David did not ascend to heaven.” The prophecy is about Dowd, so he is not the one who said what follows – negating the somewhat clever repositioning. The Greek citation replaced Yahowah’s name with “kurios – Lord,” giving the false impression that there were two “Lords” in the passage, with one referring to “Jesus Christ.” However, counter to Peter’s claim, nothing in the prophecy applies to anyone other than the 576man to whom it was addressed – Dowd.
Before we move on, let’s compare God’s Word to man’s New Testament drivel…
“A psalm (mizmowr) about and to (la) Dowd | the Beloved (Dowd). Yahowah (Yahowah) prophetically announces in advance of it occurring (na’um) concerning the approach of (la) my Lord and Upright One (‘adony / ‘edony): ‘You have chosen of your own accord to actually dwell (yashab) at (la) My right side (yamyn ‘any) as an eternal witness (‘ad).
I will place (syth) your enemies and those who discount you (‘oyab ‘atah) as (la) your foot (regel ‘atah) stool (hadom).’” (Mizmowr / Psalm 110:1)
Versus:
“For (gar) Dauid (ΔΔ), did not (ou) ascend (anabaino) to (eis) heaven (ouranos), but (de) himself (autos) said (lego), ‘Said (eipon) Lord (ΚΣ): My (ego) Lord (ΚΩ) sits and resides (kathemai) out of (ek) My (ego) right side (dexios) until (hoes) I put (tithemi) your enemies (echthros) as a footstool (hypopodion) for your feet (podos).” (Acts 2:34-35)
How is it that over the past 1,700 years, not a single theologian has denounced this obvious deception while countless have opined that it validates the Trinity? Is the Christian religion universally effective at incapacitating every believer’s ability to think or are the clerics and theologians in on the scam?
While the misappropriated and mistranslated portion of the Psalm in Acts 2 concludes with the 1st verse of Mizmowr 110, I am not one to turn the page when there is much more to learn, when there are false prophets to expose, and when there are liars to condemn. The fraudulent repositioning of the 110th Psalm to elevate “Jesus” over Dowd is something those who love Yahowah 577must challenge with evidence and reason.
Also relevant, Psalm 110 is the single most quoted Hebrew prophecy in the Greek New Testament. And this is in spite of its repetitive mentions of Yahowah’s name and its overt condemnations of Yisra’el’s foes, particularly as Yahowah and His coworker rid the world of Christians.
As we recommence, be aware that there is no reference to Gospel Jesus ever touching a scepter or a lance. He did not wield a staff while shepherding sheep. However, Dowd held all three in a meaningful way. Dowd ruled over Yisra’el as King and he is defined by Tsyown, but neither applies to the myth of Iesoun. Dowd fought countless battles to protect his people, while Christon did not fight anyone. I share this to reaffirm that the Mizmowr was written to and about Dowd, and therefore, it was wrong to claim it for the imposter.
“Your mighty scepter (mateh ‘oz ‘atah – your fortified staff, powerful spear, and forceful lance), Yahowah (Yahowah – the proper pronunciation of YaHoWaH, our ‘elowah – God as directed in His ToWRaH – teaching regarding His HaYaH – existence and our ShaLoWM – restoration) extends (shalach – reaches out) from (min) Tsyown | the Signs Posted Along the Way (Tsyown) to rule, dominating and subduing (radah – to lead and direct while showing authority over (qal imperative)) your foes who are openly hostile to your status and opposed to your position (‘oyab ‘atah – your enemies and those who discount you, displaying animus and rancor toward you) in battle (ba qerab – while fighting the war).” (Mizmowr / Song / Psalm 110:2)
Yahowah spoke of doing this very thing for and with Dowd in the Shamuw’el / 2 Samuel 7 passage that Peter, Paul, and pals misappropriated. It is a constant theme throughout the Prophets. Dowd is a fighter, a shepherd and king who constantly battled to protect his people. Gospel 578Jesus never confronted a militant foe.
We will discover that both Dowd, and the legends propping up his counterfeit, will attest that they came from Bethlehem. In Dowd’s case, leaving the “House of Bread” proved symbolic of him removing the yeast from our souls during Matsah. Further, the location and purpose of Tsyown are explained in harmony with the Mashyach who lived there, while Gospel Jesus is never mentioned in association with this place. This connection is so strong, there is only one man, at the exclusion of all others, of whom Yahowah would “extend from Tsyown.”
There are only three individuals Yahowah has foretold are returning. ‘ElYah will arrive in Yaruwshalaim on Passover in 2030 to serve as one of two Witnesses alongside Yada’, Dowd’s Basar | Herald. And Dowd will be returning with Yahowah on the Day of Reconciliations in 2033 as Mashyach and Melek. His first order of business will be to do as Psalm 110:2 proclaims. These are the three men with three lives. All three will have lived a full life to old age, a very short and challenging one of three to four years, and an eternal one thereafter.
We know that there are a number of exceedingly expressive prophecies pertaining to the fulfillment of Pesach, Matsah, and Bikuwrym. Not only is Gospel Jesus never mentioned in association with them, Dowd is typically named and always depicted.
In this next statement, ‘am ‘atah | your people is used in reference to the family comprising the Children of Yisra’el – not a gowym church.
“Your people (‘am ‘atah – your family) will be free and abundantly enriched, willing and able (nedabah – will be liberated and highly motivated, desirous and eager to volunteer and play their part), on the day (ba yowm – during the time) associated with the beautiful appearance and uncommon splendor, the uniquely 579majestic and honorable manifestation (ba hadar qodesh – in glorious fashion, instilling respect, adorned in a manner which sets you apart as a person of the highest status), of your physical prowess, exceptional qualifications, noble character, and unique ability (chayl ‘atah – of your extraordinary endurance and effectiveness, even your enormous wealth, the strength of your troops and your political and military competence, also your ability to prosper through an eternity of time).
From (min – out of) the womb and in love, showing the compassion of a Mother (rechem – the point of origin with great affection and mercy, showing concern for the relationship), your light will dawn, approaching (mishchar la ‘atah – in the early morning light, your time will approach, transitioning from darkness to light with a renewed vigor; from my – to ponder the implications of shachar – being diligently observant while earnestly seeking the truth from the onset, right from the very beginning with) the prosperity and abundance (tal – like the enveloping covering and refreshing nature of the dew, you will be renewed, adorned, and pervasive; from talal – to be wholly saturated and covered) of your youth (yalduwth ‘atah – of the time you were young, your childhood; from yalad – when you were born).” (Mizmowr / Song / Psalm 110:3)
This is prophetic of the Second Coming of Dowd | David. By delivering on the promised benefits of Pesach, Matsah, and Bikuwrym, Dowd abundantly enriched his people while liberating us from our prior guilt, making us appear perfect in God’s eyes. His beautiful reappearance occurred on Firstborn Children when his prowess as the Son of God and King of Kings was reappointed.
The Messiah was able to serve Yisra’el and Yahuwdah in this way because of his exceptional qualifications, noble character, and unique capabilities – making him the perfect man for the job.
580The reference to his Mother is to the Ruwach Qodesh | Set-Apart Spirit who removed Dowd’s soul from She’owl the morning of Bikuwrym. Her light revealed his brilliance. And as a result of what they have achieved, we prosper.
There may even be references to the Messiah’s Third Coming as well. This will be a time when everyone will be like-minded, and motivated to help rid the world of every threat – including Christianity, Islam, Judaism, and Socialist Secular Progressive Humanism. God’s people will rally around our Shepherd and King, eager to volunteer as the Earth is scrubbed of the stench of religion and nationalism.
We are told on two occasions that Dowd was beautiful, a particularly handsome man (Psalm 45 and 1 Samuel 16 and 17). By contrast, the legends pertaining to Gospel Jesus suggest that he was average-looking at best. Therefore, should I have been correct regarding ma’al describing “a minute, exceedingly small, piece” of Dowd’s DNA, then we will see him in all of his original glory – just as this Psalm attests.
This said, Yahowah’s perspective on men is different from our own. Dowd was beautiful in Yahowah’s eyes for many reasons. Among them were his brilliant mind, soaring rhetoric, passion for his people, and exemplary character. I have only seen his words, and yet, after observing them I have come to love him.
One of the most effective ways to ascertain the identity of the individual presented in Messianic prophecies, such as this one, and others like what we read in Yasha’yah / Isaiah 9:6-7, is that Dowd’s name appears in almost all of them. Further, Dowd is often presented as a gibowr | a courageous and capable man. Its definition is very similar to chayl, which speaks of “physical prowess, exceptional qualifications, noble character, and unique ability.” It foretells of a man of “extraordinary endurance and 581effectiveness, who possesses enormous wealth.” And as a gibowr and chayl, we know that the Messiah will be “a warrior, someone who fights to defend Yisra’el, competently leading troops into battle while wielding political and military authority.” Dowd is this man. Gospel Jesus was not.
The conclusion of the 3rd statement of the 110th Mizmowr speaks of Dowd to the exclusion of all others. He was born Beloved. He is the ultimate recipient of Yahowah’s rechem | love and affection. He was known for beginning his day at dawn and no one began as gloriously in their youth as God’s son. He was not only chosen and anointed at eight, in short order, he slayed his people’s most belligerent foe. His best Songs were written early in his life.
Equally befitting, Yahowah tells us that Dowd will be “as brilliant as the sun” upon his return. He will be “as God.” This promise is made in the 89th Mizmowr which we will consider again in the concluding volume of Twistianity.
Not only did Dowd provide an abundance of Mizmowr / Psalms during his life as God’s Shepherd and Chosen One, as Yahowah’s Firstborn and the returning King of the Universe, Dowd will receive the lion’s share of the inheritance associated with the Covenant.
While Yahowah made promises to many, there were only two to whom He made solemn oaths: ‘Abraham and Dowd. And since He has already fulfilled all of His promises to the former, it appears as if Yahowah is ascribing yet another distinction upon the latter…
“Yahowah (Yahowah – a transliteration of , our ‘elowah – God as directed in His towrah – teaching regarding His hayah – existence) has sworn an oath, having made a solemn promise (shaba’ – He has affirmed the truthfulness of His previous statements by meeting the 582conditions in association with seven), and will not change it (wa lo’ nacham – will not reconsider or relent, and He will not alter His course of action, and He is not apologetic or sorry).
You are a royal advisor and supreme leader adorned in a priestly fashion (‘atah kohen – you are a counselor and ruler, the principal officer, serving by ministering; from kahan – to serve by playing the role of a priest, becoming a priest, and being adorned as a kohen) forever (la ‘owlam – for the duration of time) with regard to the words of (‘al dibrah – corresponding to the proper sequence of events which have been communicated through the words of; feminine of dabar – the spoken and written word of) Meleky Tsadaq | My Rightful King (Meleky Tsadaq – My Royal Counselor, Advisor, and Sovereign Ruler; from melek – king, which is from the verbal root malak – to be king and to provide counsel and advice with the pronoun suffix y – My and tsadaq – right, correct, acquitted and vindicated, just and righteous, which is from the verbal root tsadaq – to be right and thus to be correct, to acquit and be vindicated, and to be justified, righteous, and upright).” (Mizmowr / Song / Psalm 110:4)
Throughout the prophets, Yahowah speaks more about Dowd, and of the promises He has made to him, than any other individual – and by a wide margin. At one point in the 89th Mizmowr, God even says that if all of the promises He has made to Dowd do not materialize, you can call Him a liar – which is what Christians have done by transferring everything said of Dowd to “Jesus.”
As a direct affront to the most pervasive plague to infect humankind – Christianity – God says regarding this individual that He will not change His mind. This is a stunning rebuke of Replacement Theology in the very Psalm used more than any other to advance this malignant mythology. What Yahowah promised to do for and with His Beloved and Firstborn Son, His Chosen Shepherd and 583Messiah, the King of Kings, cannot ever be taken away from him and given to another.
The concluding phrase of the 4th statement has left scholars and theologians bewildered for centuries because they are unwilling to search for the meaning of Hebrew words – especially names. And they fail to appreciate how context dictates the proper way to translate the ideas embedded within the terminology.
God is not talking about a “kohen – priest” in the sense of a Lowy | Levite serving in this role. The only Lowy of the status required to be the subject of this prophecy was Moseh – and it does not apply to him. He has fulfilled the mission of liberating the Children of Yisra’el while helping them grow by sharing Yahowah’s Towrah | Guidance and Teaching.
I say this because no Lowy | Levite, other than Moseh | Moses, chose to dwell at Yahowah’s right side while serving as an eternal witness. However, Moseh’s foes were vanquished long ago. Dowd’s arose after his service as king and prior to his return.
Moseh wielded a staff, but not a scepter or a spear. Dowd held all three. Dowd is the living embodiment of Tsyown while Moseh never set foot upon this place. Moseh was a liberator and Dowd a defender.
That is not to say that Dowd won’t be serving as a priest, because he will, and in the most essential way and on the most important day. It was while translating and analyzing the 3rd chapter of Zakaryah that I came to realize that Dowd would be serving in the role of High Priest, doing what Yahowah instructed of ‘Aharown regarding anointing the Kaporeth | Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant on Yowm Kipurym to prepare Yisra’el for Yahowah’s return. That is why Psalm 110:4 acknowledges that Dowd will be adorned in priestly fashion.
584Any allusion to another individual besides Dowd, including Moseh, dissipates entirely within the 3rd statement because the final liberation and enrichment of Yisra’el will occur upon Dowd’s return, when he will be as brilliant as the sun. It is God waxing poetic about His beloved Son, the poet, when He calls his “appearance beautiful” and “uniquely majestic.” As for “honorable,” “earning the highest respect,” and “being exceptionally qualified,” these are accurate assessments of this man of “noble character and enormous wealth” – even by God’s standards.
As we continue to demonstrate that this prophecy could only be addressing one man at the exclusion of all others, should Yahowah have been addressing “Jesus” as Christians claim, by “shaba’ – honoring a solemn promise” which He “lo’ nacham – will not change,” then God could not have endorsed a new religion based upon Replacement Theology, a New Testament, or negated the role of the Passover Lamb. And if the kohen is a reference to Moseh, then the Towrah remains in effect – now and always.
The key to understanding kohen is to look beyond the initial definition to its secondary connotation, “counselor and advisor,” recognizing that this is why the title was chosen. And then we must look to its actionable root: kahan, meaning: “royal ruler, priestly advisor, supreme leader, and sovereign counselor who serves the people while adorned in priestly fashion.” Since there has never been a Lowy who qualifies within this context, Yahowah is addressing the “royal advisor and supreme leader” of His people who is Meleky Tsadaq | My Rightful King. Of these, there is only one: King Dowd.
The problem people seem to have translating this is that they are not familiar with the words which comprise the names Yahowah has chosen. There is no “priestly order of Melchizedek.” It is nothing more or less than Yahowah announcing that Dowd is His rightful king. Meleky means 585“My King” and Tsadaq means “right.” Based upon the root meaning of both words, Meleky Tsadaq conveys: “My Royal Counselor and Advisor, My Sovereign Ruler who is right, correct, acquitted, and vindicated, justified, righteous, and upright.”
More than for anyone who has ever lived, Yahowah has said of Dowd that he is right. And when the people chose Sha’uwl, Yahowah chose Dowd as Melek of Yisra’el.
At this point, the prophet announces that Dowd, as Yahowah’s Right Hand, will do as God has promised…
“My Lord and my Upright One (‘adony / ‘edony ‘any – the one I look up to as a sign of respect and my foundation and support upon which I stand), who is at Your right hand (‘al yamin ‘atah – upon Your right side, designating the preferred position of authority and power), he will strike (machats – will pierce and dash, severely agitate and shake up, ultimately crushing) during this time (ba yowm – in this day) of His king’s wrath (‘aph huw’ melek – of the frustration and resentment of His ruler, the righteous indignation of His sovereign counselor).” (Mizmowr / Song / Psalm 110:5)
The prophet, most likely Nathan, is revealing what Yahowah revealed to him about the return of his King, our Messiah and Savior, Dowd. At Yahowah’s right hand, ha Mashyach will lash out at Yisra’el’s foes, especially Christians, Muslims, religious Jews, and Progressives. The King is angry, as is his God. And frankly, after reading Acts, who can blame them?
Should you be a Christian, this is not good news. To be judged seldom has a favorable outcome – particularly now. And to have the man whose life your religion has ransacked, and whose people you have demeaned and “replaced,” be the arbitrator puts those who believe in the Pauline “Jesus Christ” in a very bad position. But do not 586take my word on this – listen to God.
“He will execute judgment to defend and to accuse (dyn – he will decide between right and wrong based upon the agreed set of principles, adjudicating by contending and convicting, taking legal action against while debating and disputing) among the Gowym | Gentile religions and nations (ha gowym – those who are not Jews, the communities of people from other races, cultures, and places) filling them (male’ – putting an end to them) with corpses (gawyah – with the carcasses of dead bodies; from gewah – to be left behind, feminine of gowy – non-Yisra’elites).
He will strike, mortally wounding (machats – he will physically impact and dash, slicing up and shattering), the leaders (ro’sh – the highest-ranking individuals, especially those who govern at the highest levels) of the greatest on Earth (‘al ‘erets rab – the preponderance of the earth).” (Mizmowr / Song / Psalm 110:6)
Methinks Gowym did not replace Yahuwdym.
And yet Gowym Christians believe that this Lord, the one killing them and their leaders, will be their very own “Jesus Christ.” Welcome Twistian Zombies to the land of the Living Dead.
Once upon a time, I shuddered when I read statements like this one. But now, I concur with them. The punishment fits the crime. And without recompense, there is no justice.
Yahowah will once again engage with Dowd, the returning Messiah, to protect His people and home from a world that has turned against them. It is appropriate and fair.
Gentile Christians and Muslims, Conspirators and now Socialists, Communists, and Progressives, have continued to conspire to rob King Dowd’s people of their calling, their land, their rights, their dignity, their freedom, and 587their very lives. And they have chosen to support human religious and political institutions whose edicts besmirch Yahowah’s name and reputation. Their assembly of United Nations is overtly and overwhelmingly anti-Israel. It is so pathetic; the leaders of nations will invert the truth and embrace Islamic terrorists to condemn God’s people.
If I were to ask you to name a moral and truthful political or religious leader, and give you a month to find one, your list would appear as a blank page. Goodbye and good riddance. And along with this cadre of corrupt souls, we can toss out the myth that the 110th Psalm demonstrates that, while David was excluded from heaven, dead and buried, he nonetheless peered into the Christian paradise to praise the Lords who had dealt fraudulently with him.
We now have irrefutable proof that those who wrote the Christian New Testament were disingenuous and incompetent, deliberate liars who played the faithful for fools. They despised the God whose authority they claimed and disparaged His people. And for these insights, our journey into Acts has paid dividends.
And let’s be clear, Peter, Paul, and Luke disrespected the Messiah and Son of God. As proof, they plundered and slandered him.
Since Luke was not yet through tarnishing everyone’s reputation, let’s see what else Paul’s propagandist had his master’s principal rival say on the occasion of sullying Shabuw’ah. Perhaps playing the role of a ventriloquist, the puppet master would pull the strings and project the voice such that his dummy would continue to make ludicrous claims about the fabled reincarnation of Dionysus and counterfeit of Dowd – Iesoun Christon.
588“Therefore (oun – consequently, these things being so), let every (pas) household (oikos) in Israel (Israel – a transliteration of Yisra’el) know (ginosko –acknowledge) with certainty (asphalos – beyond any doubt) that (hoti) the Lord (ΚΝ – placeholder for kurion, meaning Lord) made (poieomai – performed what was required to cause and designate) him (autos) the (tov) Christ (ΧΡΝ – placeholder for Christon) and God (ΘΣ – placeholder for theos – god), this (houtos) Jesus (ΙΗΝ – placeholder for Iesoun) whom (hos) you crucified (ΕΣΡΩΣΑΤΕ – placeholder for aorist active tense of the verb stauroo – affixed to an upright stake).” (Acts 2:36)
Based upon their grotesque misappropriation of Yow’el 2, Psalm 16, 2nd Samuel 7, and then the 110th Mizmowr to hijack Shabuw’ah, why not? Just because every word of this was wrong and there is no logical connection between those prophecies and this conclusion, what’s the harm in starting a new religion by robbing the actual Mashyach, inferring that Dowd was dead so that Iesoun could replace him, all while demoting Jews from Chosen People to God killers?
Okay, so maybe that’s not a great idea, but the Romans and Greeks believed them – and that was the point. But for what purpose: to anger God, to rob His Son, to annul His testimony, or to deny salvation? The answer: all of these things.
The Christian coconspirators actually had the chutzpa to attribute their delusions to God. And if that were not enough to certify their enduring stay in She’owl | Hell, the authors of the New Testament blamed the Jews, not the Romans, for crucifying their god.
Before I demonstrate that Peter’s every word was a lie, for entertainment’s sake, let’s play along with them for a moment. Let’s pretend that Israel existed in 33 CE, that Yahowah’s name was Kurion, that he made a Christon and 589then turned him into a Theos, and even that someone named Iesoun actually existed, but was tragically crucified. For Peter’s story to ring true, we must assume that crucifixion was a Jewish invention and that the Jews, not Romans, had the authority to convict and condemn a prisoner in the Roman-subjugated Province of Judea. But if Saint Peter’s tale were true, if those dastardly Jews killed the god the Lord had made, shouldn’t the Romans and Greeks be worshiping the all-powerful Jews? And should this have occurred as Peter Pan alleges, if a gaggle of religious goons were capable of killing the Christian god, how is such a pathetic deity supposed to restore the lives of men?
Continuing to play along, if the Lord made Iesoun the Christon so that he could be crucified by Jews, wouldn’t the Lord be a sadist? And if everyone knew this was true, why wasn’t any of this predicted or explained by the Prophets? Why is there no mention of an Iesoun | Jesus or Christon | Christ if he was to be the co-god of the coconspirators?
Why did the actual God, Yahowah, who despises being called “the Lord” since it is Satan’s title, bother with Passover when the answer was crucifixion? Why bother with the lamb if the magic is in the cross? Why did Yahowah set the example of anointing the Mashyach with oil if the same status could be achieved by lordly decree? Since the prelude to this storyline required robbing Dowd, why did God say that all of His promises on behalf of Dowd were everlasting and that He should be called a liar if not accurate?
In that it is the essence of the new religion, why is there no mention of this transfer from the King to the Counterfeit to be found anywhere in the Prophets? If this was all so obvious and convincing, why did the authors of the Christian New Testament have to consistently lie to make their point? Why, if God was now changing sides and 590rejecting Jews for having killed Him, are there countless prophecies affirming the restoration of His relationship with Yisra’el and Yahuwdah during the last days? And why, if the Gentile Church has become the Chosen People, is God shown annihilating them upon His return?
Humm…perhaps there were some glitches in the Twistian story which should have been worked out before its debut. Someone should have sent Peter, Paul, Luke, Mark, and Timothy back to the drawing board before they published this script. Either that or perhaps the Jews should have crucified them.
As we unravel this twisted tapestry, we have to unwind the script because Acts 2:36 begins with “Therefore…” If you recall, this train wreck began with Peter pilfering a prophetic pronouncement affirming Dowd’s privileged position with Yahowah. The original reads…
“A psalm (mizmowr) about and to (la) Dowd | the Beloved (Dowd). Yahowah (Yahowah) prophetically announces in advance of it occurring (na’um) to and concerning the approach of (la) my Lord and Upright One (‘adony / ‘edony): ‘You have chosen of your own accord to actually dwell (yashab) at (la) My right side (yamyn ‘any) as an eternal witness (‘ad). I will place (syth) your enemies and those who discount you (‘oyab ‘atah) as (la) your foot (regel ‘atah) stool (hadom).’” (Mizmowr / Psalm 110:1)
Through the magic of religion and demonic duplicity, this was somehow twisted into yet another way to deprive the actual Messiah, Son of God, and Savior of his due so that these credits could be awarded to the Christian counterfeit. The pipsqueak that was Peter desecrated the most exceptional man in human history by misappropriating and misquoting the prior declaration and incredulously saying…
“For (gar – indeed) David (ΔΔ – placeholder for the 591Greek transliteration Dauid), did not (ou) ascend (anabaino – rise and go up) to (eis) heaven (ouranos), but (de) himself (autos) said (lego), ‘Said (eipon) Lord (ΚΣ – placeholder for kurios – lord): My (ego) Lord (ΚΩ – placeholder for kurio – lord) sits and resides (kathemai – lives and remains) out of (ek) My (ego) right side (dexios – right hand of power and authority) (Acts 2:34) until (hoes) I put (tithemi) your enemies (echthros) as a footstool (hypopodion) for your feet (podos).’ (Acts 2:35) Therefore (oun – consequently, these things being so), let every (pas) household (oikos) in Israel (Israel – a transliteration of Yisra’el) know (ginosko – acknowledge) with certainty (asphalos – beyond any doubt) that (hoti) the Lord (ΚΝ – placeholder for kurion, meaning Lord) made (poieomai – performed what was required to cause and designate) him (autos) the (tov) Christon (ΧΡΝ – placeholder for Christon) and God (ΘΣ – placeholder for theos – god), this (houtos) Iesoun (ΙΗΝ – placeholder for Iesoun) whom (hos) you crucified (ΕΣΡΩΣΑΤΕ – placeholder for aorist active tense of the verb stauroo – affixed to an upright stake).” (Acts 2:36)
Truth cannot be deduced from a false premise or by tampering with the evidence as Peter and Luke have done. Dowd | Dauid ascended to heaven not once, but twice, and is there with Yahowah at this time. It is from Shamaym that he will return as King. Neither Dowd nor Dauid said anything of the sort. This was said to him and about him. In the prophetic citation, Yahowah’s name was cited immediately after Dowd’s, and yet it was omitted from this misappropriation. It wasn’t by accident because it affirms that this was Yahowah’s prophetic announcement regarding Dowd, thereby negating Peter’s premise.
“My Lord” is from ‘adony, and it is addressing King Dowd in the prophet’s and psalmist’s voice. The one who has chosen to live alongside Yahowah so that he could serve as an eternal and restoring witness is again Dowd. He 592has done so twice and will soon reprise the role. In the context of the 1st verse of the 110th Psalm these conclusions are obvious and rationally undeniable. Further, the enemies who have discounted Dowd are religious, beginning with Peter, Paul, and Luke. Therefore, the three stubby legs on the footstool set beneath the King’s feet may well be graven images of the blasphemers who comprise the trinity of Christian coconspirators.
That was such an inauspicious prelude to “therefore,” everything which follows would be suspect, even if it were not also false. But it was. “Israel” was destroyed by the Assyrians 2,700 years before this ploy was proposed to this imaginary audience. All that remained at this time was Roman-occupied Yahuwd | Judah.
Every household in Israel could not have known something with certainty when the chief architect was using crayons to scribble outside the lines regarding a counterfeit conceived by robbing the King to promote a fable. This invalid claim is part and parcel of religious foolology. Those who know better and are exposing the liars are repositioned such that they are presumed to agree with the liars (“you know the truth”), which means that they are lying about what they supposedly know to be true. Yes, I realize that Peter’s claim was senseless, but nevertheless, my job is to explain what he hoped to gain by stating it.
The Kurion | Lord is Satan. Yahowah is God.
The errantly cited prophecy from Psalm 110:1 made no mention of anyone becoming Christon or turning into a god. This is a non-Sequitur. There are no co-gods in the Towrah or Prophets. Yahowah is One. There are no mentions of Christons in the Towrah or Prophets either. And should either be conceived, they would be the product of men and not Yahowah.
If it were not for the fact that the Christian fable, 593Iesoun Christon, was a counterfeit replacement for Dowd, there would have been no reason to misappropriate ha Mashyach | the Messiah title as Christon. Not only didn’t the mythical misnomer Iesoun qualify, Messiah wasn’t among Dowd’s most important designations. Moreover, the only time it is used prophetically is in Daniel where Dowd, under the title of Gabry’el | God’s Most Courageous and Capable Man, revealed a prophecy pertaining to his second and third lives. In it, of course, rather than validating Christianity, he obliterated it.
There is no record of anyone named Iesou, Iesous, or Iesoun outside of the spurious, hopelessly errant, contradictory, and irrational fables composed to create the Christian New Testament out of Paul’s hideous letters. The name “Jesus,” as the interloper is addressed today as a man-god, first appeared in the 17th century after the invention and deployment of the letter “J,” something that did not exist in Hebrew, Greek, Latin, or even English.
Why would Yahowah transfer Dowd’s title of ha Mashyach to the baby god destined to be the dead god using a derogatory Greek substitute? If this title was so goddamn important, why wasn’t it transliterated like we find He did with Pharaoh?
Had Yahowah decided that He was going to play with replacement players going forward, sidelining Moseh and Dowd for the likes of these clowns, why would He have selected a Greek name for a Hebrew character?
After this litany of outright deceptions and misrepresentations, why did Peter lie and say, “whom you crucified” when addressing Israel? Since it was not true, since crucifixion was a Roman means of suppressing political uprisings by publicly torturing their rivals, and since Jews had no say in the execution of Roman prisoners, why were they falsely framed and blamed for murdering the newly minted, albeit dead god? Was it because the 594torturous assassins became the Roman Catholic Church and they wanted to shirk responsibility for their crime? Or was it that the imposition of Replacement Foolology necessitated a condemnation of Jews such that they could be replaced by the murderers? Said another way, did Satan inspire Paul by possessing him to condemn Jews to centuries of oppression and slaughter so that, after silencing and eradicating them, he could rise up over Yahowah as the Lord of Religion? Was Iesoun a ploy for this process and Peter and Paul his pawns?
Okay, so the Christian coconspirators flunked logic and lacked morality, what about their audience…
“Now when (de) they heard this (akouo – received this news and message), they were pierced through (datanyssomai) the heart (kardia).” (Acts 2:37)
Really? Are we to believe that Yahuwdym are as ignorant and irrational as Gowym? Evidently, all it takes to befuddle a batch of Israelis is to misrepresent their God, defrock their King, and then slander them with false allegations. Or, on the other hand, were Peter and Luke delusional?
“They said (eipon) to Petros (Petros – meaning stone or rock), and to (pros) the rest (loipos – remaining) of the Apostles (apostolos – those who informed and equipped as messengers), ‘Brethren (adelphos – bothers and fellow countrymen), what (tis) is a man (andros) to do (poieomai)?’” (Acts 2:37)
Exposing and condemning the charlatans would be a good start. Mocking and ridiculing them would have been ‘ElYah’s approach. Perhaps, turn to the God the imposters besmirched for answers and respond to Him. I would also recommend considering the words of the actual Messiah and Son of God whom these malcontents maligned.
“And now (de), accordingly (pros), Petros (petros – 595meaning stone or rock) told (phemi – instructed) them, ‘Change your thinking (metanoeo – after you have come to recognize that which is false, change your perspective and obtain a proper understanding of what is true to avoid the consequences) and also (kai) be baptized (baptizo – sprinkled with water) each and every one (hekastos) of you by (epi) the name (onoma) of Christou Iesou (ΧΥ ΙΥ – placeholders for Christou Iesou) in order to (eis) be pardoned (aphesis – to be released) from your sin (hamartia – being mistaken), and then (kai) receive (lambano – grasp hold of and acquire) the gift (dorea – the present) of the Holy Spirit (hagios ΠΝΣ).’” (Acts 2:38)
If you count yourself among them, I would highly recommend “metanoeo – coming to recognize what is false and changing your thinking.” As for the rest, no.
Baptism is a pagan religious rite having nothing to do with God. To promote it with religious intent is to offend Yahowah and estrange oneself from Him. The sign of the Covenant is circumcision – and that is never going to change.
God has but one name – Yahowah – and there was no one named Christou Iesou. There is no reconciliation or pardon apart from what Yahowah and Dowd accomplished on behalf of the Beryth by fulfilling the Miqra’ey of Pesach, Matsah, and Bikuwrym.
Sins are not pardoned. Guilt is removed. Souls are perfected. This occurs as a result of Matsah | UnYeasted Bread because Dowd’s nepesh | soul carried the religious and political guilt of the Covenant Family into She’owl, where it was deposited, never to be seen again.
Those who are baptized get wet. Those who accept what Dowd did for us on Matsah are cleansed.
The Ruwach Qodesh | Set-Apart Spirit embraces those who accept the conditions of the Beryth and who attend the 596Mow’ed Miqra’ey. She is never found among the religious because She finds them irritating and is allergic to them. So, this was the worst advice ever.
Recognizing that all names should be transliterated, it is useful to be mindful that there was no “J” sound or letter in Hebrew, Aramaic, Latin, or Greek. It did not even exist in English prior to the 17th century. It was then, in the 3rd edition of what had been the King Iames Bible, that “Jesus” appeared for the first time. Further, as a replacement player and counterfeit, Iesou Christou isn’t credible with a Greek name while playing the role of a Jew. The Christian myth was wildly erroneous and centuries in the making.
Making matters worse for those whose religion was named after the replacement title Christou, Iesou, Iesous, and Iesoun, upon which “Jesus” was derived, was not written on any page of any pre-Constantinian (read Catholic), 1st-, 2nd-, or 3rd-century manuscript of the New Testament. Therefore, its very foundation does not exist. Jerome, who created the Latin Vulgate on behalf of the Catholic Church, would have had access to these early manuscripts and would have known about the existence of the placeholders – and yet he chose to ignore them. As a result, twelve centuries later, a hundred years after the initial appearance of the “J” in English, and in the third edition of the King James Version, men decided to give Iesou a new name: “Jesus.”
And yet, every Christian is so convinced that Jesus is real, that he actually lived and died for them, that he was both god and man, that they openly attack anyone who is aware that Jesus is nothing more than a mythical misnomer and counterfeit, a fabled imposter.
To add insult to injury, even in the fables, Gospel Jesus was not anointed and thus was not the Mashyach. He was not Greek, so he could not have been the Christou either. Worse, the verbal root of Christou, Christon, and Christos 597is chrio, which means “to apply drugs.” Oh, what a wicked web they have woven.
Beyond this steady drizzle of delusions, please take note: on the day Christians allege their “Church” was born, Shim’own, the man they have renamed “Peter” and now claim was the first Pope, is not even alleged to have said any of the following when his audience supposedly asked him what they should do: join the church, become a Catholic, convert to Christianity, make a profession of faith, promote me to pope, kiss my ring, pay me an indulgence to minimize your time in purgatory, have your children baptized and confirmed, attend Mass, go to confession, stay clear of the seven deadly sins, become celibate, observe Lent and celebrate Christmas and Easter, perform the sign of the cross, buy some prayer beads and perform three Hail Marys, worship the Lord, bow down in prayer, tithe, trust me because I am the rock upon which the Church will be built, or don’t worry because I hold the keys to heaven. And that would be it for the claims of Catholicism.
“For indeed (gar – because) the announced promise (epangelia – consent approval) exists (eimi) for you, your children (teknon), everyone (pas) who is a great distance away (makran), and for as many (hosos) as the Lord (ΚΣ – placeholder for kurios) our God (ΘΣ – placeholder for theos) calls to Himself (proskaleomai – summons).” (Acts 2:39)
If this was the “announced promise,” why was there no announcement or promise regarding it – not a single prophecy pertaining to anything Peter said? And why, since Luke knew that there were none, did he have “Peter” misconstrue and misappropriate prophecies which spoke about an entirely different person, unrelated circumstances, and a God by another name? Why, when Yahowah tells us that He has only one name, and that “the Lord” is Satan’s moniker, does the Christian New Testament insist on 598calling their god “the Lord”? And if God is calling us to Himself, why do they ignore His Invitations? When the only thing that mattered at the moment was the fulfillment of the first three Miqra’ey, why were they never mentioned?
This is considerably less believable than Hanzel and Gretel or even the retelling of Little Red Riding Hood and the Big Bad Wolf as Charles Perrault’s story was retold and made famous by the Brothers Grimm. We might as well be reading about Cinderella, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, or Sleeping Beauty. Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, and the Tooth Fairy are more credible since they don’t require besmirching the life and lyrics of the greatest man to ever live.
Evidently, Peter would wax poetic about many more myths, and while different, they didn’t warrant inclusion in Luke’s story. He needed to dispense with Peter, sweeping him off center stage, so that he could feature the star performer in the Christian epic.
“And with many more (pleion – an increasing quantity), yet different (heteros – additional) words (logos), He admonished and testified (diamartyromai – he warned) to earnestly encourage and summon (parakaleo – to admonish, and exhort) them, ‘Become saved from (sozo apo – become healed from the sickness of) this crooked and corrupt (skolios – unscrupulous, dishonest, and twisted) generation (genea – age and race).” (Acts 2:40)
Fortunately, we are not made privy to the many more and different words, whatever they may have been. Who knows, he may have spoken of Dionysus, Christmas, and Easter, of flying sleighs and baskets of eggs.
But at least Peter finally got one thing right. It was a “crooked and corrupt generation.” But alas, he, Paul, and Luke were the most “unscrupulous and twisted” cast of 599coconspirators in it.
And there is good news for all – we have reached the conclusion of this religious rant against Yahowah, His Towrah, Beryth, Miqra’ey, Ben, and ‘Am.
“Indeed (men), therefore (oun – as a result), approximately (hosei) three thousand (trischilioi) souls (psyche) received and accepted (apodechomai – welcomed and grasped hold of) his (autos) words (legos – message). They were baptized (baptizo – dipped and sprinkled with water in pagan fashion) and were added (prostithemai – were granted and given favorable access) during (en – and in) that one (ekeinos) day (hemera).” (Acts 2:41)
At least they were clean. But this was not Shabuw’ah.
I am embarrassed to admit, but nonetheless feel the need to acknowledge, that I had once believed that the Shabuw’ah | the Promise of Seven Harvest occurred on this occasion. To my credit, while I realized that Peter’s portrayal was wrong, I was misled into believing that the next Miqra’ to be fulfilled would be Taruw’ah. Not so.
The Messiah’s prophecies, as they were written in first person and recorded in Mizmowr 22 and 88, and Yasha’yah’s portrayal of events described in Isaiah 53, speak of Dowd’s fulfillment of Pesach, Matsah, and Bikuwrym, but not Shabuw’ah.
The reason that I felt inclined to include Seven Shabat in with the first three is partly because I liked the symmetry of having the first four Invitations to Meet being fulfilled in year 4000 Yah. And the realization that the Covenant Family is enriched and empowered on this day was 600appealing since it served to provide these benefits of the Covenant. However, since we are adopted, enriched, and empowered on Bikuwrym, the Covenant’s promises are afforded based upon the initial three Invitations to be Called Out and Meet by themselves.
Further, I was called to this mission on Taruw’ah in 2001 and naturally embraced its purpose – which is to call Yisra’el home while drawing Yahuwdym away from religion and politics. This order of things was also advanced during the Olivet Discourse, when it is assumed that we were being told that no one presently knows the day or hour in which the trumpet will be blown. Taruw’ah is translated as “Trumpets” which led to this erroneous conclusion.
It was actually a Covenant member who figured it out by saying that there is no evidence for the fulfillment of Shabuw’ah and that it does not fit the Christian narrative. With my mind opened to the possibility, I immediately began reading every translation I had composed regarding Shabuw’ah and quickly came to realize that she was right.
What I rediscovered is that Shabuw’ah is a Harvest of Standing Grain which is both prominent and mature. That has not occurred. Its invitation list and menu are all-inclusive, with Gowym and Yahuwdym both in attendance. Specifically, the Harvest is symbolized by two loaves of bread, representing Gentiles and Israel. The Qatsyr is comprised of chittahym | wheats (plural), affirming this same message. And it fits the mission because it was depicted as being addressed to both Gowym and Yahuwdym initially, and only focusing exclusively on the Chosen People thereafter.
Taruw’ah is a gleaning, a much smaller harvest. It is comprised of olives, two or three from the uppermost branches (Yahuwdym) and three or four from the branches that had been cut away (Yisra’elites). And while Taruw’ah 601is based upon ruwa’ which speaks of heralding a message, both Miqra’ey – Shabuw’ah and Taruw’ah – feature the blowing of the Showphar.
Since neither the Harvest of Standing Grain nor the Gleaning of Olives have occurred, I began to search for dates. With the days demarking the past fulfillment of Pesach, Matsah, and Bikuwrym known and the future return of Yahowah and Dowd on Yowm Kipurym established forty Yowbel thereafter, all that remained was to set Shabuw’ah and Taruw’ah between them.
Moving back seven years from the October 2nd and 7th fulfillments of Kipurym and Sukah in 2033 to accommodate the Time of Ya’aqob’s Troubles, we find that Shabuw’ah falls on a Shabat, commencing at sundown on May 22nd, 2026. And that being the case, the Taruw’ah Gleaning will transpire at the conclusion of the term of the two Witnesses on the 1st day of the 7th month in year 6000 Yah / sunset on a Shabat, September 23rd, 2033. It is marked by a complete solar eclipse just as Sukah will be celebrated the same year during a lunar eclipse.
While we will consider how the prophecies recorded in Yow’el shape our understanding of the events, both wonderful and tragic, which lay before us, I would like to share this insight relative to Shabuw’ah when the Showphar will be blown as Israel burns, and in advance of Yahowah’s return…
“To You (‘el ‘atah), Yahowah (YaHoWaH), I call out (qara’). For indeed (ky), fire (‘esh) has devoured (‘akal) the dwelling places (nawah) where the word is questioned (midbar) and ablaze with flames (wa lehabah lahat) are all the trees (kol ‘ets) of the field (ha sadeh). (Yow’el 1:19)
Sound the Showphar (taqa’ showphar) in Tsyown and among the Signs Posted Along the Way (ba Tsyown), signaling future action, providing a warning, 602an explanation, and a shout of exaltation (ruwa’) on My Set-Apart mountain (ba har qodesh ‘any).
Be roused to anger (ragaz) all of you who live in the Land (kol yashab ha ‘erets) because the Day (ky yowm) of Yahowah’s (YaHoWaH) return (bow’) is near (qarowb). (Yow’el / Joel 2:1)
It will be a day of darkness during a time of ignorance and confusion when much is obscured (yowm chosek) when there is a reduction of the sun’s light (wa ‘apelah), a day of obscuring phenomenon (yowm ‘anan), gloomy and miserable (wa ‘araphel), similar to (ka) the swarthy blackness (shachar) which is spread out (paras) upon the mountains (‘al ha har) with an enormous number of dimwitted and unenlightened people so numerous as to be uncountable (‘am rab wa ‘atsuwm), the likes of which (kemow huw’) has not existed previously, even to the dawn of time (lo’ hayah min ha ‘owlam).
And after this (wa ‘achar huw’), it will never occur again (lo’ yasaph) throughout the years (‘ad shanah), generation unto generation (dowr wa dowr). (Yow’el 2:2)
As I confessed previously, I had been conditioned to associate the ram’s horn Showphar with the celebration of the Miqra’ | Invitation of Taruw’ah, the final gleaning, but it is also blown on Shabuw’ah, the largest and most inclusive harvest. It is also designed to draw attention to any important message or event, and this one day certainly qualifies because Israel is at war.
The initial assault in Islam’s final battle to eliminate Israel and exterminate Jews was enabled by the Progressives who have been so eager to sacrifice Israel and tear the tiny nation apart. It began brutally with rape, mutilation, abduction, and murder commonplace, even celebrated in an orgy of death and demons on October 7th, 2023. And while the prophet, Yow’el, reveals that it will 603get far worse, worse than can be imagined, worse than at any time in human history, before it ends, the Son will shine again ten years later to the day – on Sukah in year 6000 Yah as the moon, addressing his Herald, is finally eclipsed.
As we are reminded, there is only one place on Earth that really matters to God – the ridgeline of Tsyown on Mowryah. This is the epicenter of where today ends and tomorrow begins.
Yahowah is Light, but He is arriving at the darkest moment in our planet’s turbulent history, both from the actual obscuration of the sun’s illumination from debris in the atmosphere and also from human malfeasance – all designed to confuse the ignorant at the least opportune time as humankind comes within days of exterminating life on the planet.
Yow’el deployed the full arsenal of words depicting a deprivation of light. And that is why I turned to the root of ‘am | people, which is ‘amam, to convey the cognitive function of this invading horde – which is dimwitted and unenlightened. In some cases, at least when associated with Yisra’el, ‘am can mean “family,” and on rare occasions when depicting foes, as is the case here, ‘am is translated as “militants or army.” But in this situation, there are two things which the prophet wants us to appreciate: there are more of them than can be counted, suggesting hundreds of thousands or even a million belligerents, and that they have arrived as thick and menacing as blowing sand off of the desert – a haboob of mujahideen.
Yasha’yah also addresses this moment, saying that the narrowing of Israel at the waist by the “Two-State Solution” will result in a massive flood of combatants, far more than can be contained. In contrast to this, 3,500 Muslim mujahideen were sufficiently savage last year to bring Israel to her knees.
604But this next invasion will be so massive, Islamic jihadists will darken the hills and stir up vast mountains of dust as if forming a tsunami of sand. They will number in the hundreds of thousands and perhaps even in the millions. And yet, the good news is that man will never be this bad again. This will be the last battle. The Muslims, looking for booty and babes, will soon know that they have entered Hell.
And it is from having to witness such senseless religious carnage that the Covenant Family is being withdrawn during Shabuw’ah. After detailing the savagery of this impending war, the prophet asks…
“Who reveals and acknowledges Yada, who knows and understands (my yada’ – who actually notices and demonstrably appreciates what Yada observes, perceives, and realizes (qal participle masculine singular absolute))?
He will alter the mindset to restore and return the withdrawn (shuwb – he will continually turn around and actually bring back those who had turned away (qal imperfect third-person masculine singular)) and he will enable reconsideration while reassuring those willing to change (wa nacham – at this moment, he will console and comfort those who relent, as he is reassured when they cease what they have been doing (nifal perfect third-person masculine singular))?
He will remain to ensure that a remnant is spared (wa sha’ar – by engaging at this time, he will have assured that a portion of the whole is left, continuing to exist (hifil perfect third-person masculine singular)) in the end (‘achar – afterward and later).
He will be of benefit and a blessing (huw’ barakah – he will be commendable and appreciated for having invoked that which was uplifting), even a gift which is bestowed (minchah – presenting and offering the grain), as a leader, a prince of sorts, installed, appointed, and 605positioned before (wa nasak la) Yahowah (Yahowah), your God (‘elohym ‘atem). (Yow’el 2:14)
Sound the Showphar (taqa’ showphar) in Tsyown among the Signs Posted Along the Way (ba Tsyown). Choose to be set apart and special, dedicated to serve, consecrating (qadash) a fast, a time of abstaining from what others are consuming (tsowm). Choose to announce and welcome the invitation to (qara’ – of your own freewill, call out by reading and reciting a summons to) an assembly to meet (‘atsarah – a time to refrain from what others are doing and restrain them while gathering together for an important occasion). (Yow’el / Joel 2:15)
Choose to gather the family for a harvest (‘asaph ‘am). You have decided to be a community set apart as special and unique (qadash qahal). You as the prominent and mature want to be collected and withdrawn (qabats zaqen).
You have chosen to assemble the children (‘asaph ‘owlal), including the infants who are nursing (yowneq sad). The bridegroom is being brought out (yatsa’ chathan) of his room (cheder huw’) and the bride from her bridal chamber (wa kalah min chupah hy’). (Yow’el 2:16)
Let the celebration begin.
