11Twistianity
Appalling
…Contradicting God
2
Epicenter of the Plague
The Origin of Deception…
Like everyone in God’s story, I have a checkered past. Yahowah actually prefers it that way because overcoming challenges builds character, and we can learn from our mistakes.
For example, Moseh | Moses had been part of the political and religious establishment he was sent to challenge. His disdain for it is the reason he walked away. This made him the ideal candidate for God to deploy because they shared a common understanding and disregard for their foe.
While not at the same level, in my youth, I had been an ordained ruling elder and trained evangelist leading Bible studies and Christian assemblies. I had been content to accept the New Testament as the inspired word of God. But I left all of that behind decades ago and walked away, becoming an agnostic. And now, after devoting twenty years to translating and analyzing the Towrah, Naby’, wa Mizmowr | Teaching, Prophets, and Psalms from the oldest extant sources, I have come to realize that Yahowah is God and that there was no Jesus Christ. Paul was a charlatan, and that the Christian New Testament was comprised of fables and hearsay. Therefore, by having rejected my past affiliations and learning from my mistakes, I was better equipped to work alongside Yahowah.
These are not my opinions but, instead, thoroughly evidenced conclusions which I will prove. And while that 12may be shocking for some, there is a far more important story told within these pages: the greatest discovery of our time is buried beneath mountains of religious rubbish. And I have come to recognize that the man responsible for orchestrating most of the Christian New Testament was guilty of the greatest crime and cover-up in human history – which is why these volumes were originally entitled Questioning Paul. It was a play on his name, Sha’uwl, which means “to question him.”
As I have shared, and essential to God’s story, there is actually a Messiah and Son of God, a Savior and King, and this exceptional individual fulfilled Chag Matsah, including Passover, right on schedule as he had foretold one thousand years earlier. But this brilliant and articulate man wasn’t the guy extolled throughout the New Testament. In fact, every prophecy claimed by Christians on behalf of their mythical misnomer Jesus Christ was actually written about the individual who will soon return to fulfill Yowm Kipurym | the Day of Reconciliations. Even more amazing, this realization has been hiding in plain sight, available for everyone to read for the past 3,000 years. Only no one noticed the obvious – until now.
This being so, there is a lot at stake. The world’s most popular religion isn’t true. Knowing that their faith is wasted ought to be of interest to the billions of people caught up in the myth – although as I’ve shared, Twistianity was not written for them. While righting wrongs of this magnitude would be a worthy endeavor, it isn’t the reason I have returned to infuse these pages with what I have discovered regarding Dowd | the Beloved. My motivation now is quite simply to reacquaint God’s people with their Messiah, Savior, and King before his return and before it is too late. I serve as his Herald – a Voice calling his people home by explaining what he has and will accomplish. And the first step in that direction is to clear away the clutter that precludes the rejection of popular lies in favor of a 13little-known but profound truth. And for that to happen, the first order of business is to expose the man who led the world to believe otherwise – Paul.
Considering the consequence, it is curious that so many have placed their faith in the imposter when Paul’s letters are so readily shown to be unreliable. Even a modicum of research demonstrates that the man who became the inspiration behind most of the Christian New Testament deliberately contradicted God. And this being so, there is no possibility that his epistles can be considered the word of God.
Whether 2.5 billion Christians are ignorant, irrational, or just hopelessly indoctrinated is only a curiosity because we should all be far more interested in honoring the sacrifice that Dowd, who is commonly known as David, made on behalf of Yisra’el and the Covenant. He, his people, and his God deserve no less. And we should all be offended that Paul has heretofore gotten away with this crime because it has robbed billions of their souls.
The first ploys in this sinister plot were laid in Paul’s epistles – Galatians, 1 & 2 Corinthians, 1 & 2 Thessalonians, Romans, Ephesians, Colossians, Philippians, 1 & 2 Timothy, Philemon, and Titus – the hearsay accounts of his associates and devotees – Mark and Luke, including Acts and Hebrews. They are riddled with inaccuracies, errant citations, erroneous assumptions, historical anomalies, countless contradictions, and rational fallacies. Yet inexplicably, the world’s most popular religion is based almost entirely upon the words of a man who not only demeaned and negated the testimony of the God he claimed inspired him, but who also admitted to being demon-possessed. Since these facts are irrefutable, this systematic evaluation of Paul’s letters, and especially his foundational epistle, Galatians, may be among the most valuable and challenging books you have ever encountered.
14And yet, it is necessary. Since its inception, by falsely blaming the death of their mythological god on Jews, Christianity has sought to demonize and degrade God’s people, subjecting them to inquisitions, shtetls, pogroms, and a holocaust. This appalling conspiracy cast them as “the Synagogue of Satan,” or so it was written in the plagiarized and twisted tome of Revelation. As a result, the religion has earned this rebuke. By claiming to speak for God, by turning the myth of Jesus into a god, they have precluded billions from knowing God.
But they are not alone so this book does not stand alone. For those seeking irrefutable proof that Islam is a sadistic death cult, that Allah is not God, that Muhammad was not a prophet, and that the Quran is among the worst books ever written, I would encourage you to read the five volumes of God Damn Religion. They represent the best documented, most comprehensive, chronological, and contextual condemnations of Islam’s five oldest and most credible sources ever written. And in them, Jews will discover that Islam declared war against them 1,400 years ago, commencing with the genocidal annihilation of Jews living in the Arabian Peninsula.
Throughout the Yada Yahowah Series, and particularly in the Babylonian books chronicled in the Babel volumes, I systematically dismantle the claims of rabbinic Judaism. I share this with you to demonstrate that I am consistent when it comes to exposing and condemning the greatest threats to human salvation. And indeed, rabbis are largely responsible for both Christianity and Islam, all while Judaism remains Yisra’el’s greatest foe.
In every volume, my approach is the same. I compare what the claimant says to what Yahowah inspired His prophets to reveal, while also searching for internal contradictions, logical fallacies, and historical aberrations.
And so in these editions of Twistianity, I will 15eviscerate Paul because he initiated the fraud known as Replacement Theology which replaced Dowd with Jesus, Israel with the Church, Jews with Christians, and the Towrah with his New Testament. By comparing his rhetoric to God’s testimony and historical reality, I will demonstrate that the text of the New Testament isn’t reliable. And in this vein, I will explain how it was cobbled together over time. Historical reality is as divergent from the Christian mythology as Jesus is incompatible with Dowd.
Therefore, for those curious as to whether Judaism is beneficial or harmful, whether the Haredim are Towrah-observant or obscuring, you may want to consider the three volumes of Babel, the five volumes of Observations, the three volumes of Coming Home, and volumes three through eight of Yada Yahowah. They provide amplified translations along with an analysis of Yahowah’s testimony demonstrating how averse He is to His people’s religious rebellion. By considering God’s perspective, readers will discover that Judaism is at fault – providing the cover that Christianity required to take root and grow.
Should you read them, you will learn who Yahowah is, what He had to say, what He is offering, and what He expects in return. But fair warning: unless your mind is open, and until you are willing to question and then disassociate yourself from religion and even politics, you are not ready to meet God or to appreciate what He and His Son did on our behalf.
For agnostics and, most particularly, secular Jews, who are reading these words, Yada Yahowah was compiled for you. Over the course of these volumes, you will find irrefutable proof that Yahowah exists and that He, as God, authored His Towrah and Prophets. Beginning with the creation account, the story of the garden, the flood, the inception of the covenant, the quest for freedom, and the revelation of God’s guidance, readers are introduced to 16Yahowah and those He inspired to tell His story.
Yada Yahowah reveals that the agnostic arguments that are postured against God are in opposition to religious myths – human constructs to which God, Himself, is opposed. Our Creator prefers evidence and reason and wants you to be able to find Him through observation and contemplation. Most agnostics find that they prefer God’s approach.
Christians will chafe at the notion that “Paul,” not “Jesus,” created their religion, but that is the only informed and reasoned conclusion which can be drawn from the evidence, especially since “Jesus” never existed. Even the myth presented within the gospels could not have been a “Christian” because he was shown as being resolutely Torah observant. It was Paul who was Towrah adverse.
Paul’s rhetoric and letters were inconsistent with Yahowah’s testimony and in irreconcilable conflict with His Towrah Teaching. Therefore, the fourteen epistles dominating the New Testament could not have been inspired by the God he contradicted. His claims are not credible.
If you are religious, I am going to tell you something about yourself that you may not realize. The tendency of the vast preponderance of religious individuals is to avoid evaluating evidence, no matter how credible, even irrefutable, when it undermines their faith. Believers reject reliably documented and reasoned presentations by demeaning the character and motivations of the messenger who bears disquieting news. However, Twistianity isn’t about me but, instead, the deceivers who lied about the Messiah and God.
It will be Paul’s letters and speeches, as well as the hearsay accounts of his cohorts that will ultimately demonstrate that the world’s most influential religious icon had the audacity to contradict God, to undermine His 17testimony, and to establish a “New Testament.” Since it can be shown that his rhetoric is invalid, billions of Christians have been misled – their souls shortchanged.
The man born as Sha’uwl, who wrote as Paulos, and who is known as Paul, was not assailing Natural Law, Roman Law, Rabbinic Law, or the Talmud but, instead, Yahowah’s Towrah – which means “Teaching, Guidance, Direction, and Instruction.” We will compare the oldest textual witnesses to modern Greek manuscripts to demonstrate that Sha’uwl’s words could not have been affected by scribal error, attributing things to him that he did not actually write. And after presenting Sha’uwl’s / Paulos’ letters in English, rendering them as completely and accurately as possible using the oldest manuscripts, we will compare these findings to a variety of other translations to prove that translational errors have not negatively altered our impression of Paul’s purpose in writing his epistles.
For those who may be wondering why I am intent on revealing this man’s given name in addition to his chosen moniker, the answer is that Yahowah used the former and what’s called the Sermon on the Mount referenced the latter to convey exceptionally candid impressions of Sha’uwl / Paulos / Paul and his letters. No matter your present stance on him, you will no doubt be stunned by what God revealed about this man 666 years before he scribed his first word.
We will strive to be as precise as possible in our translations, transliterations, assessments, and analysis. By being resolutely accurate, the intended meaning of the words God and this man chose to communicate will be assessed such that we will learn the truth.
I have grown very fond of Yahowah, His nature, purpose, and plan. I am, therefore, not without bias. And that perspective is pertinent because Paul purports to speak 18on behalf of the God I have come to know, the God I have come to love by closely examining and carefully considering His Towrah and Prophets. As a result, when Sha’uwl contradicts, misquotes, and misappropriates Yahowah’s Word, I am sufficiently informed and motivated to hold him accountable.
Four years after Questioning Paul was first published, it underwent a comprehensive edit based on what I had learned while compiling An Introduction to God. In addition to producing more accurate and complete translations, I included a considerable amount of additional evidence. While I should not have been surprised, it was then that I discovered that Yahowah had spoken of Sha’uwl by name, exposing him for our benefit through one of His minor prophets. This revelation is initially presented in the “Yaruwshalaim – Source of Reconciliation” chapter because it is keyed off a comment Sha’uwl made about “running.”
Since that time, I have discovered so much more about Yahowah’s hatred of Sha’uwl | Paul and what he has done to malign God’s Word and harm His people that, in the winter of 2021, I began to update and augment the text once again. This time I added entirely new chapters exposing a plethora of additional prophecies excoriating the man Yahowah calls the “Plague of Death” and “Father of Lies.” In this supplemental work, I not only share some disquieting insights into the formation, content, transmission, and translation of the Christian New Testament, but also demonstrate that Paul’s opening salvo against Jews was filled with historical and cultural aberrations, in addition to a plethora of internal contradictions and logical fallacies.
God’s testimony in this regard is so utterly devastating to Sha’uwl’s credibility that the question of bias becomes moot. To remain rational, and thus moral, we are compelled to embrace a far more judgmental approach to 19Sha’uwl much earlier in this review of his life and words than his first letter, Galatians, alone, at least up to a point, might otherwise justify. But more on this in a moment.
Having personally met with Islamic terrorists from al-Qaeda in the immediate aftermath of September 11th, 2001, I wrote Tea with Terrorists – Who They Are? Why They Kill? And What Will Stop Them? Thereafter, I compiled Prophet of Doom – Islam’s Terrorist Dogma in Muhammad’s Own Words, now revised and renamed God Damn Religion. As a result, I have come to understand Muhammad and Islam. That is important because Sha’uwl and Muhammad share many traits in common, making Paul’s epistles, and especially Galatians, remarkably similar to the Quran in substance and style.
Apart from being willing to invest the time to learn, and then share what I have discovered, and what Yahowah has done to make this possible, I possess no other qualifications that would impress anyone. I am not a scholar nor am I a theologian – which is good because God works with neither. And since we are discussing labels, I have no affiliation with any political party or religious group. I do not seek a following and I do not profit from this research (at least not monetarily). And since it seems to be of interest to many, racially I am a mutt, part Sioux, Irish, Scottish, and English – with both ancient Romans and Celts in my distant ancestry. I am, therefore, not Jewish (or more precisely: neither a descendant of Yahuwdah nor any other tribe comprising Yisra’el).
Since I am constantly learning, I have rewritten every book many times. And while it is embarrassing to admit now, I began this project defending Paul, positioning his mantra as favorably as the manuscripts and lexicons would allow. I emphasized the positive aspects of what he had said, and all too often glossed over those things which were of concern, remaining silent when I should have spoken. Frankly, it was not until the end of the third and fourth 20chapters of Galatians that I realized that I had been played for a fool. But even then, I was initially blind to the ploy Sha’uwl was using to manipulate his audience.
It was not until having lived with this material for many months, twelve hours a day, six days a week, that I finally came to understand Sha’uwl’s strategy. It had been there all the time, blatant and obvious for all the world to see – but I had read right through it. So, when I warn you that some of this will be hard to accept, I speak from experience.
Fortunately, I can also offer the assurance that once Paul’s ploy is understood, once it has been extricated from our minds, we find God right before our eyes, speaking directly to us from His Towrah: His voice clear, His purpose unmistakable, His offer perfect. If you reject Paul and Christianity as I have done and choose Yahowah and His Covenant, you will lose nothing and gain everything.
Confessions aside, I knew that Paul’s letters were not what the world perceives as “Scripture” (a transliteration of the Latin word for “writing”), especially in the sense of being inspired by God, long ago. They, like the whole of the Christian New Testament, were poorly written and filled with contradictions; that much was obvious. And yet I still believed that Sha’uwl and those who hung around what was a cult of personality, at least aspired to tell the truth. But that is not the case. And as a result, nothing he or those under his spell have to say has any merit. Their most soaring oratory does nothing more than provide cover for a hideous deception.
As a result of my initial blindness, one caused by not only the culture in which I was raised but, also, by being unable to fathom how a hoax on the scale of Jesus and Christianity could have been perpetrated, I initially skipped over the propensity of Peter, Paul, Luke, Timothy, Mark, and Matthew to misquote and misrepresent Yahowah. And 21what’s particularly telling, Paul never quotes “Jesus.” That alone should have been sufficient to reject Paul’s egomaniacal escapade into self-indulgence.
Having at one time been beguiled by Christianity, I missed the significance of what was changed, and thus I was blind to the strategy Paul and his cohorts were deploying. This is especially painful for me to admit because rationally evaluating rhetoric was the one thing I had thought I had a propensity to do reasonably well. But with Sha’uwl | Paulos, that was not the case – at least not initially.
The reason was simple enough. Paul’s letters sit at the heart of the Christian New Testament, claiming a proud place in the “Bible.” I had once been a Christian and taught Bible studies based on his letters. His fall from “Apostle” to the “Plague of Death” was unexpected in a culture significantly influenced by his erroneous interpretations. Like billions of others, I had been errantly programmed. And this is one of many reasons God hates religion. It is capable of corrupting the majority of people most of the time.
Fortunately for me, that would change, as I hope it does for you. As I embarked upon a systematic and comprehensive journey through the text of the New Testament in the order that it was written, beginning with Paul’s first epistle, it became obvious that something was dreadfully wrong. And while I immediately recognized the character flaw emerging before my eyes as being the same one that had made Muhammad, the founder of Islam, easy to manipulate, I still could not put my finger on exactly what Paul was trying to accomplish.
Then I compared Sha’uwl’s review of a meeting between this cast of characters in Yaruwshalaim (Jerusalem’s actual name, properly transliterated, meaning Source from which Teaching and Guidance Regarding 22Reconciliation Flow), with another rendition retold in Acts. The differences were considerable. My suspicions elevated when I reached the preamble of Paul’s ultimate manifesto, beginning with the second and running through the third and fourth chapters of Galatians, during my second pass through this material, the charade was finally over. My eyes were opened, and I came to understand the edifice these false prophets were establishing. It was then that I discovered some very specific prophecies whereby Yahowah admonished His people to be skeptical of Sha’uwl – to avoid all association with him. After that, I found Paul’s ultimate confessions lurking in statements I had read through many times. Suddenly the pieces of the puzzle all fit together. There were no longer any loose ends, no more mysteries or questions.
Frankly, I was also seduced by Paul’s place as the inspiration behind the world’s most popular religion. Questioning such an esteemed individual was well beyond my comfort zone. And yet, Yahowah, Himself, reveals that far too few of us have been willing to do this very thing – and with devastating and deadly consequences.
Also challenging is the fact that we have all been conditioned to think in terms of black and white, believing that everything a false prophet says must be wrong. And yet that is not how charlatans deceive. Wrong is made to appear right by blending misconceptions with accurate statements. A counterfeit is worthless, and yet it prevails because it looks real on the surface, fooling the unsuspecting into believing that it is a genuine article. Such is the nature of Paul’s epistles. The casual reader who is not keenly observant, closely examining and carefully considering the text, while comparing Galatians to the Torah and Prophets, is easily misled by the blending of truth and lies.
But we cannot even credit the New Testament with the few things it gets right because they were misappropriated 23from the Torah and Prophets and then misrepresented to serve the interests of the belligerents. In this way, it is very similar to the Quran where Allah is Satan and Muhammad is the Devil’s Advocate.
In this regard, the last thing Paul’s inspiration, Satan, desires is to be known as the Adversary. He wants to be called “the Lord” and to be worshiped as if he were “God” – things Yahowah opposes. So we should expect the Adversary’s religious schemes to discredit the occult and attack the Devil, all while corrupting Yahowah’s testimony to produce a counterfeit religious deity who appears worthy of veneration. This is accomplished through Replacement Theology – the most sinister plot conceived by man.
As for claiming that Paul was inspired by Satan, that is not as controversial as it may appear, since Paul acknowledges it – as did Muhammad after him. Should you be unaware of this fact, you may want to consider his admission in 2nd Corinthians 12:7. It is there for all to see.
Thinly disguised lies are woven side by side and intertwined with strands of truth, which makes the resulting deceptions vastly more beguiling. This is exactly how the Serpent, representing Satan, confused ‘Adam and Chawah (Eve’s actual name) in the Garden of ‘Eden, thereby setting a precedent his proponents would follow. It would be the strategy Peter, Paul, and Luke would deploy throughout their letters. But that’s only part of the story.
Recognizing the human aversion to such sweeping changes in perspective, the following chapter is specifically designed to motivate Christians to follow Yahowah’s guidance and Dowd’s example, encouraging them to begin questioning what they may believe and have been told. If your mind is open, even just a little, perhaps you will be exposed to something in the first chapter which will trigger a willingness to think. And sometimes the smallest crack in a façade can lead to the floodgates being 24opened.
Through all of this, remain cognizant of the fundamental flaw of the New Testament, now known as Replacement Theology. There is no support for Sha’uwl’s supposition that either Jews or Israel have been written out of Yahowah’s plans or that He has transferred His promises to Gentiles. On the contrary, every end-time prophecy focuses on restoring the Chosen People and the Towrah to their rightful place within the Covenant.
If you are an atheist, agnostic, Secular Humanist, Hindu, or Buddhist, while you are welcome to read Twistianity, your time would be better spent, at least initially, reading Yada Yahowah, An Introduction to God, or Observations. It is more important that you come to know what is true than what is not. And at this point, your thinking isn’t corrupted by religious sentiments which have to be jettisoned prior to establishing a reliable foundation predicated upon evidence and reason.
Since I am devoted to awakening Jews and bringing them back home, Twistianity is vital to that cause because Christianity stands in your way. Its lies have so cluttered the path to God that it’s hard for you to imagine that there really is a Messiah and Son of God and that he came to fulfill Passover as the Lamb in 33 CE / year 4000 Yah. And so this dismantling of the Christian myth, the complete elimination of Jesus Christ and the New Testament opens the door for you to embrace this restoring and reconciling truth. And once headed in the right direction, please consider reading the four volumes of Coming Home which focus on Dowd’s contribution to our lives and on the timing of future events pertaining to Israel.
25If you are a Christian reading the final edit of Twistianity, it is likely too late for you to undergo the education and transformation required to become part of God’s family. But should you be holding out hope, depending upon your attitude and inclinations, this would not be the best place for you to start your journey of discovery. If you have been given this material by a friend, and you do not yet know Yahowah or understand His Towrah, consider reading the three volumes of An Introduction to God or eight of Yada Yahowah and learning what God has to say, in the order He said it. His story will make a great deal more sense if you begin where He began. This is especially important advice as it relates to the Covenant and to your potential participation. It is also essential to this evaluation because I will be consistently comparing Peter, Paul, and Luke’s words to God’s Word, exposing where and how they differ – which are often diametrically opposed.
If you elect not to heed that advice, consider this a friendly warning: having responded to over ten thousand emails from religious individuals over the past twenty-plus years, I have come to realize that evidence and reason are irrelevant to those who are passionate about their faith. So, if you are an Orthodox Jew infatuated with the Babylonian Talmud, rabbinic rules, and a nameless deity, the freedom and sanity offered by Yahowah may be out of your comfort zone.
Should you define yourself as a Christian (as I once did), especially an Evangelical or Catholic, if you believe that everything in your “Bible” is the inspired and inerrant Word of God, if you go to church most Sunday mornings, if you celebrate Christmas and Easter, if you are unwilling to consider irrefutable proof that God’s name is not “the Lord,” and that there was no one named “Jesus Christ,” or if you believe that your faith or religious affiliations determine your fate, then you aren’t even remotely ready 26to consider the evidence presented in this book. Moreover, since these beliefs would make you part of the problem, you are not welcome in God’s company.
Just as the Haredim swoon over the words of Rabbis Shimon bar Yochai, Akiba ben Joseph, and Moses ben Maimon, the majority of Christians are predisposed to believe that Peter, Paul, and Luke’s letters are “Scripture,” and are thus inspired and truthful. By that assessment, they are beyond reproach and cannot be questioned. As evidence of this mindset, while the Haredim will claim that Moseh founded their religion and Christians will say that their faith is predicated upon “Jesus Christ,” when asked to explain it, they will invariably cite Maimonides or Paul. And when confronted with the realization that Maimonides’ and Paul’s positions differ substantially from Moseh’s or the myth who has become “Christ,” and are the antithesis of one another, this irresolvable conflict is lost on believers. And this is because faith is an impoverished substitute for knowing.
If your mind is open, if you have jettisoned the faith of your people, if there are at least aspects of your religion which trouble you, if you realize that there are serious problems associated with Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, and Progressive Socialism, if you really want to know God, then what follows may be for you.
The evidence you are about to consider will be shocking. It leads to a place I could not have imagined before I embarked upon this voyage. And that is why I had to rewrite Questioning Paul, now Twistianity, so many times based upon what I learned along the way. Words are insufficient to express how divergent my preconceived notions were from what I discovered.
It would have been easier if I could have resolved the differences. But since I cannot, reason and compassion dictate that I should be honest regarding what I’ve learned. 27In this regard, while ninety-nine percent of what I had written in Yada Yahowah had nothing to do with Sha’uwl, based upon what I have discovered, it took some months to cleanse those volumes of Pauline statements.
Also, while Yada Yahowah, An Introduction to God, Observations, and Coming Home recount the greatest story ever told, this particular episode is not pleasant. In fact, it saddens me to forewarn you that there is something horribly wrong with the written legacy of the most influential person who ever lived. But in due time, he will hang himself with his words, not mine.
What you are going to read is thoroughly researched, comprehensively translated, rationally presented, and overtly judgmental, which is the only proper response to that which claims to be from God and yet is in discord with His testimony. And once a person comes to know for certain that the edifice billions of people are risking their souls upon is unworthy and unreliable, they cease to be moral by keeping that realization to themselves. Those who think that it is compassionate to respect everyone’s faith, no matter how faulty, are wrong.
While I have done my best, if you find an error within one of my translations of the oldest extant manuscripts, or in my comparisons or reasoning, feel free to express your concerns. I will address them and then correct the record if necessary. But please, do not quote a conflicting passage from one passage to negate something he said elsewhere, as this would only prove that the New Testament is contradictory.
Yahowah’s Words (the Towrah wa Naby’ | Teaching and Prophets) comprise the lone reservoir of evidence worthy of our consideration relative to evaluating Sha’uwl’s / Paulos’ / Paul’s veracity. The feelings and opinions of others, while important to them, are irrelevant 28to this endeavor.
If you are Jewish, are you willing to disassociate Judaism from your ethnicity? Are you capable of acknowledging that God has a name and that it is important to know and convey? Will you disregard the Talmud for the Towrah, and ancient customs and traditions for the relationship Yahowah intended? Would you prefer to be acceptable to men or to God? Are you willing to consider the role Dowd played in fulfilling the Mow’ed Miqra’ey and anticipate his return?
If you are a Christian, and if you are still contemplating whether to turn the page or close this book, I have a proposition you may want to consider. Suppose I told you that, by comparing Paul’s words to God’s Word and also to Dowd’s life and lyrics, I could prove beyond any doubt that Paul was not an Apostle, and therefore that the religion predicated upon his letters was unreliable, would you be willing to risk considering the evidence if it meant losing your faith? What’s more important to you: your beliefs or the truth? And if it can be shown that these things not only differ but are irreconcilable, which would you choose?
But that is not all. What if in addition to proving that Paul’s epistles, and thus Christianity, are neither trustworthy nor reliable, I could also prove beyond any doubt that there is a God whose testimony is dependable and unchanging, would you sacrifice your religion for a relationship with Him through it?
These propositions are not hypothetical. What lies before you will do both. It will take something rotten from you and it will replace it with something extraordinarily 29wonderful. If you are ready for the exchange of a lifetime, here is something for you to consider…
“Yahowah’s ( – the paleo-Hebrew version of YaHoWaH transliterated as instructed in His towrah – teaching regarding His hayah – existence) Towrah (towrah – teaching, guidance, direction, and instruction) is complete and entirely perfect (tamym – without defect, lacking nothing, correct, genuine, right, helpful, beneficial, and true), returning and restoring (shuwb – transforming) the soul (nepesh – consciousness).
Yahowah’s (Yahowah) testimony (‘eduwth – restoring and eternal witness) is trustworthy and reliable (‘aman – verifiable, confirming, supportive, and establishing), making understanding and obtaining wisdom (chakam – educating and enlightening oneself to the point of comprehension) simple for the open-minded and receptive.” (Mizmowr / Song / Psalm 19:7)
Since this is God’s pronouncement regarding the nature and purpose of His Towrah | Guidance, how do you suspect you will fare with Him if yours differs?
