77God Damn Religion
Slaughter
…Good Muslims Kill
2
Capitulation
The Apostle could not write, so he asked Ali to erase the expression: ‘Apostle of Allah.’
Bukhari:V4B53N408
Erase the expression: ‘Apostle of Allah.’
Islam’s sixth year dawned like all others. Muhammad scurried off on yet another terrorist raid. There is nothing redeeming about Islam.
Tabari VIII:42 “Allah’s Messenger set out six months after the conquest of the Qurayza. He went to Lihyan, seeking vengeance for the men betrayed at Faji. To take the enemy by surprise, he pretended to go north. Then he veered to the left and, having passed Yayn, his route led him directly by the main road of Mecca.”
But the bad boy had earned a bad reputation so… Ishaq:485 “Muhammad found that the Lihyan had been warned. They had taken secure positions on the mountaintops. After he failed to take them by surprise as he intended, he said, ‘If we go down to Usfan, the Meccans will think we have come to [terrorize] them.’ So he set out with two hundred Muslim riders before halting at Usfan, and then he returned to Medina.”
While the Muslim marauders struck out on this day, the unGodly and horrific crimes they had committed against the Jews bolstered their war efforts. A few months earlier, Muhammad and his militants could only muster thirty-six horsemen against the Jews. But now, after having sold Jewish children into slavery, they were two hundred strong. That should be enough to convince the world that Islam was a criminal enterprise at its inception.
78Muhammad’s militants recorded this little ditty: Ishaq:486 “If the Lihyan had remained in their homes they would have met bands of fine fighters, audacious warriors who terrorize. They would have confronted an irresistible force glittering like stars. But they were weasels, sticking to the clefts of rocks instead.”
The next Hadith chronicles another failure. While it wasn’t for lack of hellish effort, apart from the Badr score against some balding merchants and the systematic plundering, exile, and annihilation of defenseless Jewish families, the Muslims were terrible terrorists. Muhammad was as inept at Quran recitals as he was at slaughtering anyone capable of defending themselves.
We learn that a man named after the Quran’s first god, Abd-Rahman, raided the prophet’s camels, driving them off and killing a herdsman. Tabari VIII:44 “Salamah said, ‘Tell the Messenger that the polytheists have raided his camels.’ Standing on a hill, I faced Medina and shouted, ‘A raid!’ Then I set out after the enemy, shooting arrows and saying rajaz verses: ‘Today the mean ones will receive destruction.’”
Since all of Muhammad’s camels were either stolen outright, or purchased with stolen booty, the moral of the story is: stealing what’s stolen is bad. The Islamic cavalry was sent in hot pursuit. Tabari VIII:46 “If you believe in Allah and know that Paradise is real and that the Fire is real, do not stand between me and martyrdom!’ But Abd-Rahman dismounted and thrust his spear into Akhram. So I shot Abd-Rahman with an arrow, and said, ‘Take that!’”
Muhammad’s marauding horde failed to recapture the twice-stolen booty, but they managed to recite some revealing poetry: Ishaq:489 “War is kindled by passing winds. Our swords glitter, cutting through pugnacious heads. Allah puts obstacles in our victims’ way to protect His sacred property and our dignity.” The man who kindled the winds of war was: “Allah’s Apostle, our amir, a man whose message we believe; he is a Prophet who recites a luminous light-bringing Book.”
79As you read this next violent diatribe, consider the message and style. This is the same rajaz poetry in which the early surahs were revealed while incorporating the message of the more recently recited. Ishaq:489 “Do the bastards think that we are not their equal in fighting? We are men who believe there is no shame in killing. We don’t turn from piercing lances. We smite the heads of the haughty with blows that quash the zeal of the unyielding. We’re heroes, protecting our war banner. We are a noble force, as fierce as wolves. We preserve our honor and protect our property by smashing heads.” It’s little wonder Hitler modeled Nazism after Islam. For both, their focus was on conquest and killing.
Turning the page, we are confronted with tales of bragging bullies vying for attention. Tabari VIII:48 “Then he set out at full speed after the enemy – he was like a beast of prey.” Fixated on raiding civilians, a series of Traditions praise Muslims who could shoot and shout at the same time.
After repeated failures, Muhammad assigned commanders, established raiding parties, and then judged his companions’ killing prowess, before sending them out against his enemies. Then: Ishaq:490 & Tabari VIII:51 “When Allah’s Messenger heard about the Mustaliq gathering against him he set out and met them at one of their watering holes near the coast. The people advanced and fought fiercely. Allah caused the Mustaliq to fight and killed some of them. Allah gave the Apostle their children, women, and property as booty.”
When the Muslim militants went after the Quraysh caravan and ended up mutilating their relatives at Badr, Allah boasted in the 8th surah that it was he, not them, who wielded the swords and sent killer angels to facilitate the slaughter and spoils. When the Qaynuqa, Nadir, and Qurayza Jews were terrorized, Allah claimed credit for the most unGodly acts in the 33rd and 59th surahs. On this day, Muhammad set off with a band of mujahideen, and after the Muslims advanced on their prey – families, not armies – Allah incredulously claimed that he prompted the fight. If we are to believe the un-god, he personally murdered some 80of these men and then abducted their women and children. He handed these innocent and defenseless people, who were now bereaved and traumatized, over to his non-prophet as “property” and “booty” to rape and sell.
From this, we can derive several relevant conclusions. First, Muhammad’s Muslims were common thugs, a gang of murderous thieves. They attacked families, as they had the Jewish communities in Yathrib, not enemy combatants. They were men without morals, cowards – albeit sadistic and verbose.
Second, the primary business of Islam was human trafficking and slavery. Muhammad was the godfather of a criminal enterprise, not a prophet. They abducted and sold women and children for profit. They were deadly parasites preying on life.
Third, Allah is delusional. Other than inspiring the worst in those who submit to him, he is not only inept and immoral, he claims credit for the actions of others – just as he has pretended that he was the God of ‘Adam, Noach, ‘Abraham, and Moseh. Allah, therefore, is neither God nor worth venerating. The Quran is a farce and Islam is condemnable, not laudable.
What’s happening here is the essence of Islam. Muhammad needed a way to make his vulgar deeds, including mass murder, genocide, assassination, abduction for ransom, the slave trade, armed robbery, anti-Semitism, exiling entire populations, terrorism, pedophilia, incest, rape, and misogyny appear acceptable, even commendable and praiseworthy. By alleging that a wannabe god participated and perpetrated the crimes, applauding them, Muhammad obfuscated personal responsibility for his heinous behavior.
Islam’s founder is now an open book. Unappreciated, neglected, and abused as a child, he craved revenge. The Quraysh leaders became his enemy as they withheld the 81sustenance that flowed from the Ka’aba Inc. Muhammad sold his soul to the Devil to take it away from them. As insecure as Hitler, he craved the things he thought would make him appear worthy: sex, power, and money – total obedience in addition to determining who lived and died.
Placed into the context of these historical Hadith, the following Tradition from Imam Muslim is untrue. An invitation to surrender was never part of Muhammad’s battle plan. Muslim:B19N4292 “Aun inquired whether it was necessary to extend (to the infidels) an invitation to submit to Islam before murdering them in the fight. Nafi told me that it was necessary in the early days of Islam. The Messenger (may peace be upon him) made a raid upon Mustaliq while they were unaware and their cattle were having a drink at the water. He killed those who fought and imprisoned others. On that very day, he captured Juwayriyah. Nafi said that this Tradition was related to him by Abdallah Umar who was among the raiding troops.”
Let it be known, Juwayriyah / Yuwayryah was a Yahuwd. Yahowah was her God. Her name says it all. And she was enslaved by Muhammad, who raped her.
We have yet another admission that the first and best Muslims were terrorists who launched surprise attacks on innocent and unsuspecting men and women, even children, who were tending their flocks and herds. They confessed to murder and to taking captives whom they sold into slavery. They even confirmed Muhammad’s personal involvement, acknowledging that “he killed” some, “imprisoned” others, and then “captured Juwayriyah,” the chief’s daughter. This is an appalling picture – one that warrants disgust, not admiration. To pretend under these circumstances that Muhammad was a “prophet” is the height of ignorance and irrationality. He was a revolting thug who has earned an eternal stay in Hell.
The premise of the Hadith, which was capitulation or decapitation, was rejected by the body of the Tradition. There was no invitation to Islam. This was a surprise attack 82by armed raiders on defenseless and unsuspecting civilians. The stated purpose was to assert Muhammad’s influence, to steal what belonged to others who were working to improve their lives, and to turn women and children into slaves. So, in these ways, it was Islam.
Continuing to rat on themselves and gloat, documenting their atrocities as would the Nazis after them, the accounts of the slaughter and spoils, the rape and enslavement of the Mustaliq continues…
Tabari VIII:56 & Ishaq:493 “According to Aisha: ‘A great number of Mustaliq were wounded. The Messenger took many captives, and they were divided among the Muslims. Juwayriyah was one of the slaves. When the Prophet divided the captives by lot [gambling], Juwayriyah fell to Thabit, Muhammad’s cousin. She gave him a deed for her freedom which he did not accept. Juwayriyah was the most beautiful woman and she captivated anyone who looked at her. She came to the Apostle seeking his help. As soon as I saw her at the door of my chamber, I took a dislike to her, and I knew that he would see in her what I saw.’”
Aisha was right… Tabari VIII:57 “Muhammad said, ‘Would you like something better than that? I will discharge your debt [ransom payment] and marry you.’” The story is that she agreed. The reason: “A hundred families of the Mustaliq were freed as a result of the marriage. I know of no woman who was a greater blessing to her people than she.” Juwayriyah was an actual martyr. She allowed herself to be raped by the ugliest of men to free “a hundred families” from Islamic slavery. Juwayriyah was, indeed, a beautiful woman.
The Emigrant Muslims from KabaVille who were of the Bani HaShem clan and, thus, likely Jews, and the less-esteemed Arab Muslims from Yathrib, fought with one another. Tabari VIII:52 & Ishaq:491 “Jahjah and Juhani began crowding each other at the watering place and fought. Juhani shouted, ‘People of the Ansar [Yathrib’s Arab Muslims called “ansar – helpers”].’ Jahjah shouted, ‘People of the Emigrants [Quraysh Muslim vagabond from the “Beni HaShem – Sons of the Name” in Petra].’ Abdallah bin Ubayy [the leader of the Ansar] 83became enraged and said, ‘Why are they doing this? Are they trying to outrank us and outnumber us in our own land? The proverb “Feed a dog and it will devour you” fits these Quraysh vagabonds. When we go back to Medina, those who are stronger will drive out the weaker. Then he turned to his tribe and said, ‘This is what you have done to yourselves! You have allowed them [the stray “dogs” who have now turned to bite the hand feeding them] to settle in your land and divide your wealth. Had you kept from them what you had, they would have moved to another place.’”
Not only were the first Muslims at each other’s throats, it’s far worse than that. Islam exists today for one reason, and one reason alone. After destroying his credibility and his religion in KabaVille with the Never-Ending Argument, Ridiculous Recitals, the Threat to Slaughter his own family, the Idolatrous Indulgence, Satanic Verses, and the fabled Donk-Mule flight to the imaginary Al-Aqsa Mosque, Muhammad was down to a “few weak Muslims.” And he had lost the ability to recruit replacements. A complete failure, the non-prophet begged every passing pagan pilgrim at the Ka’aba to accept him. But all said, “No,” except for a score of Arab losers from Yathrib who saw this as their way to loot the Jews who had made the desert bloom. For promises of booty in this life and the next, they offered to obey Muhammad and kill for him – to wage war on everyone else. Turns out, dealing with the Devil was a bad idea.
After exiling and annihilating some 30,000 Yathrib Jews, stealing their homes and possessions, and selling their children into slavery, the malcontent Yathrib Muslims learned that Muhammad and Allah couldn’t be trusted. The spoils either went entirely to Muhammad, or they were divided disproportionately to the vagabonds whom they had invited into their town. Not only did the non-prophet and un-god change the rules to suit their situation, but by proving unreliable in this life, they demonstrated that they were untrustworthy regarding the hereafter. And then, after overhunting defenseless Jews, and screwing the Ansar of their share of the booty, Muhammad’s Muslims turned their 84swords on neighboring Arabs. So now, no one was safe from Islam.
Back in Yathrib, and in the presence of the Godfather, the Ansar Muslims weren’t ready to let the internal dispute and outburst drop. They wanted blood… Tabari VIII:53 “Abdallah said, ‘Those who are stronger will drive out the weaker from Medina.’ But you, O Messenger of Allah, will drive him out if you wish. He is the weak one, and you are the strong one. Allah caused you to arrive at the moment when his people were stringing precious stones to make him a crown; he thinks that you deprived him of a kingdom.’”
Ishaq:491 “Umar said, ‘Tell someone to go kill him.’ The Apostle answered, ‘But what will men say about me if I start killing Muslims?’” Neither the lives of Muslims nor the religion of Islam mattered. Muhammad’s only concern was, “What will men say about me?” Therefore, we can conclude that Islam was nothing more than Muhammad’s personal cult.
This is as Yahowah predicted, telling all who would listen that the Muslims claiming descent from Ishmael would be wild asses of men, whose hands would be raised against their brothers while they lived in hostility with the rest of the world. Islam is at war with human decency and with life. When there are no more non-Muslims within reach, they will turn on each other.
Just then, a young Muslim recruit must have rushed in: Tabari VIII:55 & Ishaq:492 “‘Messenger of Allah, I have been told that you want to kill Abdallah bin Ubayy. If you are going to do it; command me and I will bring you his head. I will kill a believer to avenge an unbeliever, and thereby enter the Fire of Hell.’
The Prophet said, ‘No.’ Thus after that day it was his own tribesmen who censured him and threatened him. When word of how they were behaving reached Muhammad, he said to Umar, ‘What do you think, Umar? Had I killed him the day you ordered me to, prominent men would have been upset, who, if I ordered them today to kill him, would do so.’” Muhammad wasn’t just evil, he was a scheming psychopath.
85Other than prostrating oneself in submission, paying the zakat, and engaging in Jihad, Muslims have never had a way to determine who really was one. Even Muhammad couldn’t tell. And as we have discovered with these rants against pacifist Muslims becoming apostates, the line between the brothel and the fire was blurry…
Tabari VIII:55 “Miqyas came from Mecca, pretending to have become a Muslim, and said, ‘Muhammad, I have come to you as a Muslim to seek blood money for my brother who was killed by mistake.’ The Prophet ordered him to be paid blood money for his brother and he stayed briefly with Muhammad. Then he attacked his brother’s slayer, killing him. He left for Mecca as an apostate.” According to Islam, an apostate endures hell’s hottest flames. So it’s okay to kill and good to accept booty for killing, but only if Allah is credited with the murder.
This Hadith is also revealing: Ishaq:485 “‘O Apostle, I will accept Islam and give you my allegiance on the condition that my past faults are forgiven and no mention is made of what has gone before.’ Allah’s Messenger said, ‘Give your allegiance, for Islam does away with all that preceded it, as does the Hijrah [Muhammad’s shameful flight from the mess he had made in Petra].’”
Muhammad announced, and Ishaq dutifully recorded, words that should send shivers up the spine of every non-Muslim. The “religion” of Islam, the mean-spirited and demented doctrine of rants and recitals that emerged before the terrorist raids, before grand larceny, mass murder, abduction for ransom, engaging in the slave trade, and calling dibs to rape the prettiest girls, was no more. All that preceded the Hijrah was now abrogated. Villainy, vice, and violence were all that mattered now.
Aisha got her pigtails bent out of shape with the addition of Juwayriyah, the second Jewish slave to the harem. She was a woman of character and beauty while Aisha was a child. Therefore, the next six pages in both Tabari’s History and Ishaq’s Biography are dedicated to what is called, “The Account of the Lie that Was Uttered.”
86Ishaq says, with great trepidation: Tabari VIII:58 & Ishaq:493 “According to a man I do not suspect, and others who contributed parts of the story, a report has been assembled for you based upon what people have told me in regards to the account of Aisha’s story about herself, when the authors of the lie said about her what they said.” Muhammad’s Muslims accused Aisha of infidelity – cheating on the philandering non-prophet. If he were born in the Year of the Elephant as is heralded in the Quran and Hadith, he would have been a pudgy 75 with rotting teeth and an ugly disposition while she was a skinny twelve-year-old victim of sexual abuse, less than one-sixth his age and one fifth his weight.
Afraid to criticize Muhammad’s excuse and contradict the Quran, Tabari treads lightly, as well. Tabari VIII:58 “Each contributed to her account. Some related what others did not. Each was a reliable informant concerning her, and each related about her what he had heard. The whole of her story rests on these men.” Neither Tabari nor Ishaq batted an eye when they told us that Muhammad had spoken for Satan, and that Allah had approved booty, rape, and the slave trade. They reported the annihilation of the Jews like true soldiers. But now, they have made a dozen excuses so as to say: “If you don’t like this report, don’t blame me.” With Muhammad, sex was a sensitive topic.
Tabari VIII:58 & Ishaq:494 “Aisha said, ‘When the raid on the Mustaliq took place, Muhammad had his wives draw lots as he used to do to see who would accompany him. My lot came out over theirs, and he took me along. Women in those days used to eat only enough to stay alive; they were not bloated with meat so as to become heavy. While my camel was being saddled, I would sit in my litter; then the men who were to bind my litter onto my camel would come and place my howdah on the camel. They would take hold of the camel and walk alongside.”
This provides an interesting insight into Muhammad’s priorities. Setting off on a terrorist raid, he used men and a camel to carry a girl so that he might not be deprived of sex. 87As such, believing he was a prophet speaking on behalf of God requires one to be deprived of a brain.
Ishaq:494 “When the people had mounted, I went out to attend to a need of mine (to relieve myself). I had a necklace with onyx beads. When I was finished it came undone without my noticing. I retraced my steps to the place where I had gone looking until I found it. But while I was away, the men who saddled the camel for me assumed that I was in the litter and lifted it up. When I returned to the camp, not a soul was there. I wrapped myself in my jilbab and lay down in the place where I had gone. I thought they would return.”
The continuing saga is so peppered with innuendo, it’s embarrassing: Tabari VIII:58 & Ishaq:494 “I had just lain down when Safwan al-Sulami passed by. He had lagged behind attending to a need of his. He had not spent the night with the troops. When he saw my form, he approached me and stood over me. He used to look at me before the veil and hijab was imposed on us. When he saw me, he exclaimed in astonishment, ‘The Apostle’s wife!’ He asked why I was alone, but I did not speak. Then he brought his camel near and said, ‘Mount! I mounted and he came. He took hold of the camel’s head and set out with me, hastening in pursuit of the party. He told me to ride it while he kept behind. So I rode it.”
The rumor mill was spinning out of control. Aisha said, Tabari VIII:60 “The story reached the Prophet and I missed the attention he once showed me.… He would come to see me while my mother was nursing me, and say ‘How is she?’ and nothing more. We were Arab folk. We did not have these privies in our houses that the foreigners have; we loathed such things. Instead, we would go out into the fields of Medina. One day while I was out with the girls. One said, ‘Daughter, take it lightly. Whenever a beautiful woman married to a man has rival wives, they always gossip about her, and people do the same.’ I showed my astonishment.”
So Muhammad used his mosque to attack those who had defamed his favorite toy. When he finished, Usayd said, “Even if they are brothers, give the command. I will rid you of them because they deserve to have their heads cut off!” A squabble ensued. Ishaq:496 “‘By Allah you lie,’ one said to another. ‘Liar yourself!’ ‘You are a disaffected person arguing on behalf of the diseased,” another shouted, providing fodder for the fourth 88surah. “Over this affair, fighting almost broke out between the Muslim clans.”
Yet some men were simply rude rather than rash. Tabari VIII:62 & Ishaq:496 “Ali [Muhammad’s adopted son, son-in-law, future Caliph, and Shi’ite saint] said, ‘Prophet, women are plentiful. You can get a replacement, easily changing one for another.’” Studying the formation of Islam is like wallowing in the mud with pigs. It stinks to high heaven and there are swine everywhere.
But this little pig wasn’t finished. He huffed: “Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.’ So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her. Ali got up and gave her a violent beating first, saying, ‘Tell the Apostle the truth.’” Caught between a sexist and a sadist, the slave was of no value to either. Ali couldn’t force her to speak badly of Aisha and Muhammad chose not to listen. All we know is that the founders of Islam captured and owned slaves, and they beat them without remorse.
In a related Hadith: Muslim:B40N6837 “Allah’s Messenger delivered an address, mentioning a camel and a bad person who cut off its hind legs, ‘When the basest of them broke forth with mischief.’ He then delivered instruction saying, ‘There are amongst you those who beat their women. They flog them like slave girls. Then after flogging them like slaves they comfort them in their beds at the end of the day.’ He then advised in regard to people laughing at the breaking of wind and said: ‘You laugh at that which you yourself do.’” It may have been the world’s worst sermon. Muhammad was a man with no morals and no skills.
While this is a story about Aisha’s alleged infidelity, we are learning a great deal about the nature of Muhammad’s deeply flawed character and the lack of moral standards among his cronies. For example, the first Caliph, Abu Bakr, wasn’t much of a father.
Tabari VIII:63 & Ishaq:496 “When Muhammad came into my room, my parents were with me. I was crying. I waited for my mother and father to reply to the Apostle, but they did not speak. I asked my parents why they were afraid to defend me, but they said nothing. My 89weeping broke out afresh. I swear, I considered myself too lowly and unimportant for Allah to reveal a Quran about me to be recited in mosques and used in worship. But I was hoping that the Prophet would see something in a dream from Allah which would clear me of this.”
Aisha was young and cute, so what do you suppose the perverted non-prophet did next? Yep, he contrived another Allahism to satiate his cravings. Muhammad was predictable… Tabari VIII:63 & Ishaq:497 “Before Allah’s Messenger left the place he was sitting, there came over him from Allah what used to come over him. They covered him with his garment and set a leather cushion under his head. Then he recovered and sat up; drops of sweat fell from him like silver beads. He began wiping the perspiration from his brow and said, ‘Good news, Aisha! Allah has sent down word about your innocence.’
I said, ‘To Allah’s praise and your blame!’ Then he went out to the people and preached to them. He recited the Quran Allah had revealed concerning me and gave orders concerning Mistah, Hassan, and Hamnah who were the most explicit in their slander. They received their flogging of eighty lashes. They were beaten to the boundary of death for their crime against the religion of Islam.”
This equates “the religion of Islam” with allowing the non-prophet to continue as a pedophile. All that was required was to pretend he received a surrotten and then whip three Muslims to the precipice of death. And for his part in this sham, Muhammad worked up a good sweat.
Islam’s founder routinely made up Quran recitals to suit his agenda. However, this one was unique because Aisha knew better – and said so. That’s why she condemned Muhammad the moment he cited what became the 24th surah – An Nur | The Light. The odds that it was a divinely inspired revelation from God are zero. But that no longer matters, because Islam has puked on itself so many times now, the religion died a suicidal death long ago. This is now an autopsy.
90Quran 024.001 “A Suratun | Surah (chapter) We sent it down and We made it obligatory. And We revealed therein aytin | signs (and verses) clear so that you may be warned.
Quran 024.002 The female fornicatress and the male fornicator, flog each one of them a hundred lash. And not you withhold (because of) pity for them concerning dini | religion of al-Lahi if you believe in il-Lahi and the Last Day. Let a group of believers witness their punishment.”
Lo, verily, al-Lahi not oft-forgiving, most merciful to his witnesses. But for Muhammad, he was a bastion of sexual indulgences. After all, for Muhammad to avoid having the lash applied to him, he had to have his god condone polygamy, pedophilia (which is what is being approved here), incest (approved earlier in the 33rd surah), unwed sex with concubines (which is fornication), and sex with slaves (which is rape). In other words, Muhammad was a hypocrite – the embodiment of what he condemned.
This was one of the few times “Allah” “spoke” of a suratun. While the word actually means “bracelet,” under the “chapter” designation, surah initially appeared in the 2nd recital (Quran 002.023), where it was used as a taunt, suggesting that no one could possibly reveal anything like it. The suratun challenge was repeated in Quran 010.038 and again in Quran 011.013, which are very late surahs, as is the case with Quran 047.020 where believers are troubled by the revelation of war surahs. Then in addition to the obligatory commandment for flogging witnesses who say things that Muhammad doesn’t like, surah appears four times in the 9th, which was the second to the last chronologically.
Farada, the Arabic root for “an imposed, ordained, and obligatory command,” is also a late phenomenon. It appears only in the Yathrib war surahs, including the 2nd (five times), the 4th (five times), the despicable 33rd (twice), and once each in the war-torn 9th and 66th surahs. Allah didn’t become overtly demanding, issuing obligatory commands, prior to 91Muhammad establishing himself as a terrorist. It was so Machiavellian of them.
Zani in its various forms is only translated as “fornicator” in the 24th surah, where it appears six times. The other three times zani is used (Quran 017.032, Quran 025.068, and Quran 060.012) it is rendered according to its Hebrew root as “adultery.” But such is the duplicity of Quran translators. Had they rendered zani correctly and consistently, then with a harem of a dozen or more women and children, at least three of whom were slaves, two were underage, and one his son’s wife, Muhammad would have been the first to be flogged for adultery.
Rape, pedophilia, forced prostitution, incest, sodomy, bestiality, and adultery were and remain exceedingly common among Muslims because the ungod sanctioned almost every form of sexual perversion and robbed Muslims of the capacity to be moral or even to love one another. Muhammad was repeatedly guilty of rape, pedophilia, adultery, and incest. And Allah’s Paradise is a brothel where children, both boys and girls, are served up as virgins to exploit. After terrorist raids, Muslims, with Muhammad participating, drew lots to determine who would get to rape whom. Sex slaves were and remain common. Muslim men are allowed to “marry” four women at a time, with the fourth slot open for rotation to accommodate fornication and sanctioned prostitution. Saudi and Kuwaiti royals will even travel with sheep because many prefer them to women. (While I pity the sheep, having endured the shrill and rude voices of many very nasty Muslim women, who can blame them?) So if Muhammad and his men had been accountable to zana, he and they would have been skinless.
The torturous and sadistic nature of fa-ijlidu | flogging is only found in this surah indulging Muhammad’s predilection for pedophilia. Everywhere else the word is used, it is translated as “skin or hide” This includes the 4th, 16th, 22nd, 39th, and 41st surahs – where fa-ijlidu is presented 92in the singular form, as “skin,” as it is here, even misrepresented with 100 “lash.” Therefore, this is another anomaly, where the primary meaning of the word must be discarded and replaced to accommodate Muhammad’s depraved behavior and sadistic disposition.
Depending upon the cruelty of the Muslim scourger and the viciousness of the whip, 100 lashings would either scar and disfigure a person for life, cripple them, or kill them. And although Allah is Satan, since Muslims are oblivious to the obvious, they punish women with the whip, believing that they are implementing “God’s Law.”
And as we now know, this was one of a thousand iterations of ayat | signs and proofs without any being manifest. And here, this is the fifth word that must be misrepresented to fit within the declaration. It means “signs,” not “verses.” However, neither Muhammad nor Allah could write.
The sixth errant rendering in the “You Flog Them We Burn Them” Surrotten is bayin, which is properly translated as “between,” not “clear.” It is only when the Hebrew-derived term is used as a verb does it mean “to make the proper connections between things to understand.” It does not mean “clear.”
The one mandating the mutilation of witnesses to accommodate Muhammad’s sexual perversions laughably uses rafatun | kindness to describe himself. The sadist and psychopath would have Muslims believe that he is rafatun | most kind to his slaves. But obviously, that is not true, because here, al-Lahu is insistent that Muslims show no compassion for those being flayed alive to indulge the unempathetic and pathetic non-prophet.
As we are now aware, il-Lahi’s Last Day is nothing of the sort unless it is interpreted as the last day Satan and his slaves will exist on Earth. Upon Yahowah’s return with His Son, Dowd, Satan will be dispatched to She’owl – along with 93all who are overtly religious, political, militant, conspiratorial, and anti-Semitic.
Since Muhammad’s plaything had been accused of adultery, in order that her services might continue to arouse him, this Quranic surah was conveniently revealed.
Quran 024.003 The fornicator will not marry except a fornicatress or one who associates (polytheist) and the fornicatress will not marry here except a fornicator or a man who associates. And is forbidden that to the believers. Quran 024.004 And those who accuse the chaste women, then not they bring four witnesses, then flog them eighty lash. And do not accept their testimony ever. And those, they the defiantly disobedient, Quran 024.005 except those who repent from after that and reform, then, lo, al-Laha forgiving, merciful.”
Aisha had but three accusers. How fortuitous. And of course, apart from accommodating Muhammad, the requirement of four witnesses is inane because fewer than one in a thousand sexual assaults or even private moments of romantic expression have four non-participating and thus, unbiased witnesses. Therefore, the reason for the absurd requirement in this case is that only three Muslim men were willing to criticize the perverted sexuality of their cruel despot.
Now that the witnesses have been punished and the perpetrators exonerated, Muhammad put Muslim women in their place – in submission to men.
Quran 024.006 And those who accuse their wives and do not have for them a witness except themselves, then the testimony of one of them is four testimonies by il-Lahi that he surely of the right.”
That pretty much sums up the plight of Islamic women. If men say they are bad four times, they are as good as dead. Men don’t need evidence and women lose even with it.
In the Islamic world, women can’t speak or even leave home without a man’s permission. So this next verse is rendered moot. Quran 024.007 “The fifth, that curse of al-Lahi upon him if he is of the liars. Quran 024.008 But it would prevent her 94from the punishment that she bears witness for testimonies by il-Lahi that he surely of the liars. Quran 024.009 And the fifth, that the wrath of al-Lahi upon her if he is of the right. Quran 024.010 And if not, the grace of al-Lahi upon you and His mercy and that al-Laha oft-returning, all-wise.” Since that was unintelligible, I’ll not attempt an explanation.
Recognizing Muhammad’s predicament, we find another series of verses that are senseless without the context of the Hadith. And within their context, they are petty and vengeful, focused on the desires of the Quran’s author. The sheer volume of these verses should tell you all you need to know about his priorities.
Quran 024.011 “Lo, those who brought the slanderous lie are a group among you. Not think it bad for you. Nay, it is good for you. For every person among them is what he earned of the sin and the one who took upon himself a greater share of it among them for him a great punishment. Quran 024.012 Why not when you heard it think the believing men and the believing women good of themselves and say, ‘This is a lie clear.’ Quran 024.013 Why did they not bring it for four witnesses. Then when they did not bring the witnesses, then those near al-Lahi, they the liars.”
The very existence of an obligatory surah, the first and only in the Quran, recited in support of pedophilia is unconscionable. The notion that this is the perfect word of God, the final message to humankind, through a moral prophet, has been obliterated.
Quran 024.014 “If not grace of al-Lahi upon you and Him mercy in the world and the hereafter surely would have touched you in what you had rushed glibly concerning it a great punishment. Quran 024.015 When you received it with your tongues and you said with your mouths what was not for you of it any knowledge and you thought it was insignificant while near al-Lahi great. Quran 024.016 Why not when you heard it you said, ‘Not it is for us that we speak of this. Glory be to You! This a great slander.’”
Imagine that, Muhammad is over seventy when sexually abusing his closest friend’s pre-pubescent daughter, and al-Lahi claims that those who were calling it immoral were 95slandering the Rasuli. How does one malign a pedophile and rapist, a slave trader and mass-murdering terrorist? Do you say that they are a lousy child abuser and pathetic sexual pervert, an unprofessional jihadist and crappy murderer? Or to slander them, do you have to call them the paradigm of virtue?
Quran 024.017 “Al-Lahu warns you that you return like of it ever if you are believers. Quran 024.018 Al-Lahu makes clear to you al-ayati | the proofs. Al-Lahu knower, wise. Quran 024.019 Lo, those who like that spread the immorality among those who believe for them a painful punishment in the world and the after. Al-Lahu knows while you do not know. Quran 024.020 And if not grace of al-Lahi upon you and His mercy, and that al-Laha full of kindness, merciful.”
The demonic spirit of painful punishments, slaughter and slavery is kind and merciful – no worse than Hitler, perhaps. And proof of this is one hundred lashings followed by a romp through the fire. So clearly, such a sadistic and duplicitous spirit couldn’t be Satan, because, well, if he was, then who is al-Lahi?
Quran 024.021 “O you who believe! Follow not the footsteps of al-Shaitan | the Adversary (Satan). And whosoever follows the footsteps of al-Shaitan, then, verily he commands al-fahshai | immorality (indecency), and al-munkar | disbelief and polytheism (to do what is forbidden in Islam). And if not for the grace of al-Lahi and His mercy not have been pure among you from anyone ever but al-Laha purifies whom He wants. Al-Lahu hearer, knower.”
How is it possible that a book that claims to have been written before the universe was created, a god’s last witness to humankind, could focus so intently on a child accused of adultery by the most credible, albeit now tortured, witnesses, and yet say nothing about the indiscretion associated with these accusations? Aisha was upset because Muhammad traded sex with a beautiful Jewish child for the release of one hundred families from slavery. It’s obvious Ibn Ishaq, the prophet’s earliest and most trusted biographer, and Tabari, the first Islamic historian, were bothered too. And that’s why they said:
96Ishaq:493 “According to a man I do not suspect, and others who contributed parts of the story, a report has been assembled for you based upon what people have told me in regards to the account of Aisha’s story about herself, when the authors of the lie said about her what they said.” In other words, the same sources who conveyed the Hadith and Quran were witnesses against Aisha and thus spoke against Muhammad and the Quran.
The demon-possessed non-prophet wasn’t done attacking those who had tried to deprive him (a seventy-five-year-old man) of the pleasures of possessing a twelve-year-old child Quran 024.022 “And let not those among you of virtue and the increased means that they give their kinsmen, the needy, and the emigrants in al-Lahi’s Cause. Let them overlook. Do you not like that al-Lahu should forgive you? And al-Lahu is oft-forgiving, most merciful. Quran 024.023 Lo, those who accuse the chaste women, the ignorant women and the believing women are cursed in the world and the hereafter. For them a great punishment.”
Al-Lahu continues to flunk his audition as god. Islam is a great farce, not a great religion. And just as the ungod wallowed in incest, he is now pandering to pedophilia.
Quran 024.024 “Day will bear witness against them, their tongues, their hands, and their feet for what they used to do. Quran 024.025 “That Day, al-Lahu will pay them in full their recompense, the due, and they will know that al-Laha, He the truth, the manifest. Quran 024.026 “Evil women for evil men and evil men for evil women. And good women for good men and good men for good women. Those innocent of what they say. For them, forgiveness and a noble provision.
It wasn’t enough for the un-god to demean the witnesses, nor even dissuade any Muslim from ever challenging the non-prophet. He would double down on hysteria and call the Day of Doom to witness against the conscientious objectors. Non-prophet and un-god would be a tandem team of tormentors, with floggings and recriminations now and fire and punishments later.
Now that Muhammad had added the beautiful Jewish child to his collection of sex slaves, as well as the most 97attractive woman among the Jews he had recently slaughtered and enslaved, and had a divine sanction to molest Aisha again, it was time for prophetic privacy…
Quran 024.027 “O you who believe, do not enter houses other your houses until you have permission and you are greeted on its inhabitants. The best for you so that you may be warned and pay heed. Quran 024.028 But if not you find in it anyone, then not enter it until permission is given to you. And if it is said to you, ‘God back,’ then go back. It purer for you and al-Lahu of what you do all knower. Quran 024.029 Not upon you any blame that you enter houses not inhabited in it a provision for you. And al-Lahu knows what you reveal and what you conceal.”
After all, women were now possessions and Muhammad had a full house. So, it was time to restrict access to his toys…
Quran 024.030 “Say to the believing that they should lower their gaze and they should guard their chastity. That purer for them. Lo, al-Laha all-aware of what they do.
Quran 024.031 And tell the believing women to lower their gaze, and protect their private parts and not to show off their adornment except only that which is apparent (like palms of hands or one eye or both eyes for necessity to see), and to draw their veils all over Juyubihinna (their bodies, faces, necks, and bosoms) and not to reveal their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers, their husband's fathers, their sons, their husband's sons, their brothers or their brother's sons, or their sister’s sons, or their women, or the slaves whom their war captives, or old male servants who are impotent, or small children who have no sense of the shame of sex. And let them not stamp their feet so as to reveal what they hide of their adornment. All of you beg al-Lahi to forgive you all, O believers, that you may be successful.”
To this pervert, women were objects, not people – just as men were merchandise to be acquired and traded. Since Muhammad financed his war machine on the slave trade, and satiated his libido by the admission of slaves into his harem, we shouldn’t be surprised by…
98Quran 024.032 “And marry the single among you and the right among your male slaves and your female slaves. If they are poor, al-Lahu will enrich them from His fadi | merit (bounty). And al-Lahu all encompassing, all knowing.
Quran 024.033 And let those who find not the financial means for marriage keep themselves chaste, until al-Lahu enriches them of His bounty. And such of your slaves as seek a writing, give them such writing, if you know that they are good and trustworthy. And give them something yourselves out of the wealth of al-Lahi which He has bestowed upon you. And force not your female slaves to prostitution, if they desire chastity, in order that you may make a gain in the goods of this worldly life. But if anyone compels them (to prostitution), then after such compulsion, al-Laha is oft-forgiving, most merciful.”
When enslaved women were given to Muhammad’s militants as booty, they were forced into prostitution. But even with experience, they guys weren’t qualified to open a brothel, much less start a religion.
Nonetheless, what better than to remind Muslims that his license to lash women, rape and prostitute them, comes directly from Allah and is written in the Quran…
Quran 024.034 “Verily, We have sent down to you ayatin | proofs clear and an example of those who passed away before you and a warning for those who fear.”
Actually, a hundred lashes as a punishment for three witnesses providing testimony was unheralded, as was the idiocy of having four witnesses pursuant to a sexual encounter. Even the idea of beating witnesses if there were only three was not exemplified previously. Therefore, Allah is lying about lying.
And he is no better at presenting a credible deception that he is at authoring a passable parable…
Quran 024.035 “Al-Lahu is the light of the heavens and the earth. The parable of His light is as a niche and within it a lamp, the lamp is in glass, the glass as it were a brilliant star, lit from a blessed tree, an olive, neither of the east nor of the, whose oil would almost glow forth though no fire touched it. Light upon Light! Al-Lahu 99guides to His light whom He wills. Al-Lahu sets forth parables for mankind, so al-Lahu is all-knower of everything.”
One would have thought that al-Lahu would have improved with practice. But these surahs are no better than those recited seventeen years earlier. Case and point…
Quran 024.036 “In houses al-Lahu ordered that they be raised and be mentioned in them His name. Glorify Him in them in the mornings and the evenings.”
Of course, there is more to being a false god than self-glorification. To satiate his cravings, Muslims must also humiliate themselves through prostrations, taxation, capitulation, and fear…
Quran 024.037 “Men not distracts them trade and not sale from remembrance of al-Lahi and from establishing the prostration and providing the tax. They fear a Day will turn about therein the hearts and the eyes Quran 024.038 that al-Lahu may reward them best what they did and increase them from His merit. And al-Lahu provides whom He wants without measure.”
Leaving dimwitted we return to demented. Business is a distraction for committed jihadists, so one must question the source of income used to pay the taxes. After all, the mujahideen have already forfeited a fifth of what they have stolen. And surely, no one would be expected to pay for these recitals…
Quran 024.039 “But those who disbelieve their deeds like a mirage in a lowland thinks it the thirsty one water until when he comes to it not he finds it anything but he finds al-Laha before him. He will pay him in full his due. And al-Lahu swift the reckoning.”
After failing to perform for 1,400 years, methinks al-Lahu is anything but swift. And as for his accounting, he doesn’t even know the timing of his own Day of Doom. And even if he were to miraculously whip up a handy calendar, he and his slaves were illiterate, so no one could have read it anyway.
100But, alas, what’s the point since the light would be extinguished as darkness ensues with incoming waves…
Quran 024.040 “Or like darkness in a deep sea covers it a wave on it a wave from on it a cloud darknesses some of it on others. When he puts out his hand, hardly he can see it. Whom not al-Lahu made for him a light, then not for him any light.”
The matching verse from the previous surah adds: 023.040 “Soon they will regret. Torment and an awful cry will overtake them. We have made such men rubbish, like rotting plants. So away with the people.” Being sent to hell to be tortured without being given a choice is sadistic. Being called rotting rubbish is demented. But what would one expect from the delusional…
Quran 024.041 “Do not you see that al-Laha glorify Him whoever in the heavens and the earth and the birds wings outspread. Each one verily knows its prostration prayer and its glorification. And al-Lahu all-knower of what they do. Quran 024.042 And to il-Lahi dominion the heavens and the earth. And to al-Lahi the destination.”
Unable to perform a miracle or produce a prophecy, Muhammad tells us that rain was proof that his spirit was divine. And then, of course, there is the proof that the sky comes down from the mountains with hail which strikes whomever Allah pleases…
Quran 024.043 “See you not that al-Laha drives clouds then joins between them, then makes them a mass, and then you see the rain comes forth from between them. He sends down from the sky from mountains within it of hail. And He strikes with it whomever He wants, and averts it from whom He wills. Nearly, flash its lightning takes away the sight.
Quran 024.044 Al-Lahu alternates the night and the day. Lo, verily, in that surely is a lesson for those who have sight. Quran 024.045 Al-Lahu created every creeping creature from water. Of them who walks on its belly and of them who walks on two legs and of them who walks on four. Al-Lahu creates what He wills. Verily al-Laha on every thing all-powerful. Quran 024.046 Lo, We have sent 101down the signs (verses) clear. Al-Lahu guides whom He wills to a straight path.”
Only in Islam are day and night lessons for those who have sight. And naturally, as a Snake, al-Lahu gave himself top billing. But since serpents are naturally serpentine, how does a slithering snake guide to a straight path?
It was time for Muhammad’s rock to denounce his critics – the Muslims who were abandoning him in droves.
Quran 024.047 “And they say, ‘We believe in il-Lahi and in the Rasuli and we obey. Then turns away a group of them from after that. And not those believers. Quran 024.048 When they are called to al-Lahi and His Rasuli to judge between them, lo, a group averse. Quran 024.049 But if is with them the truth, they come to him obedient without hesitation.”
Times are tough when even the believers are disbelieving. But as the non-prophet and un-god upped the ante, from obedience and taxation to murder and robbery, the faithful began to worry that Allah might not actually be who he claims.
Quran 024.050 “Is in their hearts a disease of do they doubt or they feel that al-Lahu will be unjust to them and His Rasuli. Nay, those they the al-zalimuna | subjugating lords and cruel tyrants.”
Now what would give the citizens of Medina that impression? Just because Muhammad had assassinated journalists, led scores of terrorist raids, motivated militants with booty, murdered thousands in cold blood, raped women, stole property, and sold children into slavery, it doesn’t mean that he couldn’t be trusted, did it?
With Muslims not wanting to die fighting and killing for Muhammad, especially with him changing the rules as they went along, the Godfather devised a test, a way of distinguishing between pacifists and jihadists.
Quran 024.051 “Only is statement the believers when they are called to al-Lahi and His Rasuli to judge between them that they say, ‘We hear and we obey.’ Those, they successful. Quran 024.052 And 102whoever obeys al-Laha and His Rasuli and fears al-Laha and keeps his duty to Him then those, they the successful ones. Quran 024.053 And they swear by il-Lahi strong, their oaths that if you ordered them, surely they go forth. Say, ‘Not swear obedience known. Lo, verily, al-Laha all-aware of what you do.
Quran 024.054 Say, Obey al-Laha and obey the Rasuli. But if you turn away, then only upon him what placed upon him and on you what placed on you. And if you obey him, you will be guided. And not on the Rasuli except the conveyance the clear.
Quran 024.055 Al-Lahu has promised those among you who believe, and do right good deeds, that He will certainly grant them succession to (rule) in the earth as He granted it to those before them, and that He will certainly establish for them their religion which He has chosen for them. And, lo, He will surely change for them from after their fear security for they worship Me and do not associate anything with Me. But whoever disbelieved after this, then those, they the al-fasiqun | defiantly disobedient.
Quran 024.056 And establish the prostration prayer and pay the zakat tax and obey the Messenger so that you may receive mercy.”
Since there isn’t a single verse that suggests Allah ever spoke to his “believers,” Muslims must “hear and obey” Muhammad. Thus, a good Muslim is one who obeys his commands to: conduct terrorist raids, engage in fighting, even genocide, abduct women and children for the slave trade, steal what belongs to others, engage in world conquest, always giving the prophet his fifth of what is stolen. Such behavior makes men good Muslims but bad people.
However, since al-Lahu hasn’t delivered on his promises, why don’t Muslims sue him from breach of contract? Why do they believe that he will deliver in the next life when he hasn’t done so in this one?
Quran 024.057 “Not think those who disbelieve escape in the earth. Their abode Fire. Wretched is the destination.”
103Since there is no escaping Islam, the religion must be exterminated, especially since Allah is so fixated on capturing, possessing, selling, and abusing slaves…
Quran 024.058 “O you who believe! Let your legal slaves and slave-girls whom you possess, and those among you who have not reached puberty ask your permission on three occasions from before dawn prostration prayer, and while you put off your clothes for the noon, and after the night salat | ritual prostration prayer. Three times of privacy for you. Not on you and not on them any sin after that moving about among you some of you among others. Thus al-Lahu makes clear for you the al-ayat | signs. Al-Lahu Knowing, Wise.
Quran 024.059 And when reach the children among you the puberty, then let them ask permission as asked permission those who were before them. Thus al-Lahu makes clear for you the al-ayat | signs. And al-Lahu all-knowing, wise. Quran 024.060 And postmenopausal among the women who not have desire for nikah | intercourse, then not is on them any blame that they put aside their garments not displaying their bizinatin | charms and adornment, a wanton display. And that they modestly refrain better for them and al-Lahu, all-hearer, all-knower.”
Since this is the edict on salat, be aware that it is a Syriac term without basis in Hebrew and that it has a written legacy predating Islam. And this makes the Salat, like the Hajj, an Islamic pillar with a pagan past.
Also, while it’s readily apparent that Islam must accommodate the blind, lame, and plagued, because, without them, there would be no believers, the long list of houses and dining arrangements was peculiar and verbose, even for al-Lahi. His fixation on meaningless minutia for mindless prostrations serves as a sign that al-Lahi is in over his head while providing proof that he isn’t God.
To believe that this diatribe serving the interests of a sexual pervert and terrorist was God’s final message to mankind is an insult to our intelligence and demeaning to God. It is embarrassing.
104Quran 024.062 “The believers are only those who believe in il-Lahi and His Messenger, and when they are with him for a matter of collective action not they go until they asked his permission. Verily! Those who ask your permission, those who believe in il-Lahi and His Rasuli. So when they ask your permission for some affairs of theirs, then give permission to whom you will of them, and ask al-Laha for their forgiveness. Lo, al-Laha is oft-forgiving, most merciful.
Quran 024.063 Not make calling the Messenger among you as call some of you others. Lo, verily, al-Lahu knows those of you who slip away under shelter. Let beware those who oppose the from his commandments (his Sunnah legal ways, orders, and acts), lest some fitnah | trial or tribulation (disbelief) befall them or a painful punishment.”
Muslims had made a pledge to Muhammad to Wage War Against All Mankind. And even though it was permissible for the non-prophet and un-god to disavow their sworn oaths, it was not allowable for Muslims. There would be no excuses. The only way out of Islam is to die.
And speaking of death, since Muhammad was dead before the Quran became a book, why was this verse included? It ceased to be relevant the moment he died.
Nonetheless, this is helpful because it silences the Islamic apologists who claim that the Quran is all that matters, suggesting that the Sunnah cannot be used to discredit Allah or Muhammad. And yet, this verse, in fact, this entire surah, makes that impossible since it has been all about Muhammad’s personal perversions. Further, to obey the Rasuli, a Muslim must know what the Messenger said – and that is found in the Hadith.
Quran 024.064 “No doubt! Lo, to il-Lahi whatever in the heavens and earth. Verily, He knows what you on it. And Day they will be returned to Him then He will inform them of what they did. And al-Lahu all-knower of everything.”
Actually, based upon the Quran, al-Lahu is knower of very little. He is a dimwitted and inarticulate deity with a 105troubling sadistic bent. His remains the most inept audition for the role of God ever attempted.
Muslims could dish it out, but they couldn’t take it. One was overcome with rage after being satirized in a poem. Ishaq:498 “Safwan smote Hassan with his sword and tied his hands to his neck.” When Muhammad asked why, he explained: “‘He insulted and satirized me and I became enraged. So I smote him.’ The Apostle said, ‘Hassan, did you look on my people with an evil eye because Allah has guided them to Islam?’”
Without the benefit of an answer, the prophet told the shackled and beaten pagan to forget what the Muslim had done. Then we’re told that he offered him a bribe. Ishaq:499 “The Apostle provided some compensation that included a castle, some property, a portion of the zakat tax, and a Copt slave girl.” That was quite an offer. Muhammad must have had his tit in a ringer – and so he did.
And that is because this is part of the haunting betrayal of Hudaybiyah. Tabari VIII:67 & Ishaq:499 “The Prophet set out to make the lesser pilgrimage, not intending to make war. He had asked the Arabs and Bedouin desert dwellers who were around him to help by setting out with him, for he feared that the Quraysh would oppose him with fighting or turn him away from Allah’s House. Many Bedouins were slow in coming to him. So the Messenger set out with the Emigrants and Ansar. He took sacrificial animals with him and put on the pilgrim garb.”
The Quran hasn’t bothered to describe the pilgrimage, the use of sacrificial animals, or the special garb. And that’s because Arabs already knew about these things. They were part of their prior pagan lore. Islam simply incorporated old rites into its regurgitated dogma.
We are told that there were 700 men, 1,400, 1,300, or 1,900, depending on who is telling the tale of impending 106doom. However, if they couldn’t agree on something as significant as Hudaybiyah, what else have those who transmitted the Quran forgotten, added, or omitted?
Tabari VIII:71 “Umar said, ‘Messenger, will you without arms or horses enter the territory of people who are at war with you?’ So the Prophet sent men back to Medina and they gathered all of the horses and weapons they could find. When they approached Mecca, they prohibited him from entering, so they marched to Mina. Muhammad’s spy brought him word that Ikrimah was coming out with five hundred men. Muhammad said, ‘Khalid, your paternal uncle’s son is coming against you.’ Khalid replied, ‘I am the sword of Allah and the sword of His Messenger! Direct me to whatever you wish!’
Muhammad sent him in command of horsemen, and he met Ikrimah in the canyon and routed him, driving him back into Mecca. Khalid then routed him twice more. Regarding him, Allah revealed: ‘It is he who restrained their hands from you, and your hands from them in the hallow of Mecca, after he made you victors over them,’ until the words, ‘painful punishment.’” (Quran 048.024)
We have a fundamental disagreement. I place my trust in Yahowah. Muhammad relied upon “all of the horses and weapons they could find.” I confide in Yahowah’s testimony. Muslims preferred spies. I am Yahowah’s witness. Khalid was Allah’s sword. I am guided by the Creator, while these Muslims were misled by Muhammad. Yahowah deploys His mal’ak | spiritual messengers to protect me from the wrath of Muslims, while Muhammad had to rely upon Khalid and his horsemen to fight kin.
The only one tormenting the Quraysh was the terrorist who had threatened to slaughter them eight years prior. And at this point, the Muslim militants had prevailed over the merchants while proving that they were savages at Badr. The Quraysh merchants had trounced the malcontent marauders at Uhud. The siege of the Trench had been a draw. So Muhammad had picked the fight and he was the one pursuing it with all of his weapons.
107Ishaq:500 “The Messenger said, ‘Woe to the Quraysh! War has devoured them! What harm would they suffer if they left me to deal with the rest of the Arabs? If the Arabs defeat me, that will be what they want. If Allah makes me prevail over the Arabs, the Quraysh can enter Islam [surrender] en masse. Or they can fight. By Allah, I shall not cease to fight against them for the mission which Allah has entrusted me until Allah makes me victorious or I perish.” For Muhammad, it was a never-ending war. Salvation never entered the picture. And do not miss the fact that he was poised to “deal with the rest of the Arabs” as he had everyone else – as a ruthless terrorist.
After making his “give me victory or give me death” speech, the weasel whispered: Ishaq:500 “Who will take us out by a way in which we will avoid the Quraysh?”
Admitting that the supposed pilgrims were actually a gang of mujahideen, we read… Tabari VIII:73 & Ishaq:500 “The Messenger gave orders to the force, saying, ‘Turn right, amid the saltbush on a path that will bring the army out over Murar Pass to the descent of Hudaybiyah below Mecca.’ So the army traveled that path. When the horsemen of the Quraysh saw the dust of the army and that the Messenger had turned away from their path, they galloped back to Mecca.”
The Hadith continues by disclosing the source of the prophet’s guidance… Tabari VIII:73 & Ishaq:500 “When Muhammad’s camel entered the pass, she kneeled down. ‘She has not balked,’ the Prophet said. ‘The One who restrained the elephant restrained her. I will grant the Quraysh any wish today.’” The reference is to Abraha’s elephant who prostrated herself to the Ka’aba rather than enter Mecca. Allah was so proud of the way he killed the Yemeni, he revealed the 105th surah in his honor. And it was this event in 552 CE that is used to date Muhammad’s birth – making him 75 years old on this occasion.
Tabari VIII:75 “The Prophet said, [after returning to Medina for his weapons and routing the Meccans three times with his cavalry] ‘We have not come to fight anyone; we have come to make the lesser pilgrimage. War has exhausted and harmed the Quraysh. 108[And whose fault might that be?] If they wish, we will grant them a delay [in killing them] and they can leave me alone to deal with the Arabs. If they refuse the delay, I shall fight them for the sake of this affair of mine as long as I live.’” It’s another confession.
Tabari VIII:76 “Urwah went to the Prophet. ‘Muhammad, tell me, if you exterminate your tribesmen, have you ever heard of any of the Arabs who has destroyed his own race before you?’” Good question – one without an answer. Muhammad was the first to terrorize, enslave, and murder Arabs en masse. If he is your prophet, your god is war.
This next Hadith is especially revealing. It explains why Muhammad capitulated to his nemesis – the Quraysh. They knew him better than anyone, and after eighteen years, they not only still rejected his claims, they were not afraid to say that he was a fraud. Muhammad knew deep down that Urwah was right, and if his newly-minted Muslims were exposed to better informed and more rational men with a conscience and the courage of their convictions, he would lose the war of words as he had in the past. His collection of misfits would abandon him as they had when he was last here. The tyrant was terrified.
Ishaq:502 “Muhammad, you have collected a mixed group of people and brought them to your kin to destroy them. By Allah, I see both prominent people and rabble who are likely to flee, deserting you tomorrow. Now Abu Bakr who was standing behind the Apostle, said, ‘Go suck the clitoris of al-Lat!’” The future Caliph was a master linguist. No doubt, his oratory is shared in Muslim textbooks today.
Urwah had spoken truthfully, placing Muhammad’s barbaric deeds in the context of history and reason. But the Muslim brain trust couldn’t handle the truth, so they slandered him. Even today, when I engage Islamic clerics in debate, they attack me rather than defend Allah or Muhammad, the Quran or Sunnah.
Urwah rose above the insult… Tabari VIII:76 & Ishaq:502 “He began speaking to the Prophet again, stroking his beard. 109Mughira, clad in mail, was standing next to him with his sword. Whenever Urwah extended his hand toward the Prophet’s beard, Mughira struck his hand with the lower end of the scabbard and said, ‘Take your hand away from his beard before you lose it!’ Urwah raised his head and asked, ‘Who is this?’ They said, ‘Mughira.’ Urwah said, ‘Rude man, I am trying to rectify your act of treachery.’ During the Time of Ignorance [pre-Islam] Mughira had accompanied some men and killed them, taking their money.” Nothing has changed. “The Apostle just smiled.”
Tabari VIII:77 “Urwah began looking at the Companions of the Prophet. He said, ‘If Muhammad coughs up a bit of phlegm and it falls onto the hand of one of them, he rubs his face in it. If he gives them an order, they vie with each other to carry it out.” True enough. And considering the man, sad enough.
The next four pages of Tabari’s History wallow in the dust-filled ravines surrounding what was likely the hallows leading to the valley of Petra, but we are told it was Mecca – not in the Quran, mind you, only in the Hadith.
So as Quraysh and Muslims jockey for position, they get down to business… Tabari VIII:82 “Allah’s Messenger summoned Uthman and sent him to Abu Sufyan and the dignitaries of the Quraysh to inform them that he had come not for war but merely to visit the House [of pagan idols] and venerate its sanctity. When Uthman delivered the message, the Quraysh said, ‘If you wish to circumambulate the Temple, do so.’ He replied, ‘I will not do it until the Messenger does.’ So the Quraysh imprisoned him.”
But Islamic intelligence wasn’t very good so the chief Muslim became enraged… Ishaq:503 & Tabari VIII:82 “When Muhammad received a report that Uthman had been killed, he said, ‘We will not leave until we fight it out with the enemy.’ He summoned the people to swear allegiance. The Prophet’s crier announced: People, an oath of allegiance! The Holy Spirit has descended!’” These folks were deceived beyond reason or hope. It is why I’m writing to save Jews from them and not to save Muslims from Islam.
Ishaq:503 & Tabari VIII:83 “On the day of Hudaybiyah we swore allegiance to the Messenger while Umar was holding his hand 110under the acacia tree. It was a pledge unto death.” The Kum-ba-yah handholding around the tree was sweet and all, but I’m sure you noticed that the oath of allegiance was sworn to Muhammad as if he were Allah.
The Quran agrees: Quran 048.010 “Lo, those who pledge allegiance to you only they pledge allegiance to al-Laha. Hand of al-Lahi over their hands. Then whoever breaks then only he breaks against himself. And whoever fulfills what he has covenanted with al-Laha, soon He will give him a great reward.” The un-god and his voice were indistinguishable at this point. And that’s not good because Muhammad was a miserable man.
Having assembled his biography from oral traditions a century after these events unfolded, Ibn Ishaq knew what would ultimately unfold in the lifeless sands of the Arabian Desert. So he wrote: Ishaq:503 “Allah saw what was in their hearts [what they coveted] so he rewarded them with victory and with as much spoil as they could take. Allah promised that they would soon capture a great deal of booty.” This “victory” of great “spoils” and captured “booty” would not occur on this day, or even in connection with the Quraysh. There are several diabolical twists in this plot and so Ishaq is launching a preemptive strike against their consequences since they are devastating to Islam – particularly on this stage and at this time.
This provides an introduction to the first of them… Ishaq:504 & Tabari VIII:85 “The Quraysh intended peace when they sent Suhayl to Muhammad. He spoke for some time and they negotiated with each other. When the matter had been arranged and only the writing of the document remained, Umar jumped up and went to Abu Bakr and said, ‘Isn’t he the Messenger of Allah?’ ‘Yes’ Bakr replied. ‘And are we not Muslims?’ Umar asked. ‘Yes,’ answered Abu Bakr. ‘And are they not the polytheists?’ he asked. ‘Yes.’ ‘Then why,’ asked Umar, ‘should we grant what is demeaning to our religion?”
What could have been so awful that Umar, the future Caliph, was questioning the credentials of the man who had murdered, looted, and terrorized his way to religious infamy? It was no big deal really. All Muhammad did was 111abandon Ar-Rahman and Ar-Rahim and then renounce his claim to being Allah’s Messenger. And he did so because he lost faith. He knew that he was a pathetic fraud and that al-Lahu was a farce – and so did the Quraysh. So he was afraid that, upon seeing their kin, and comparing him to them, Muslims would choose wisely and abandon him again – just as they had done following the Idolatrous Indulgence, Satanic Verses, and Night’s Journey.
Muhammad was no longer a believer. With the return to the old haunting grounds, he was haunted by what had transpired. His nightmare began when he had been terrorized by his Lord and beaten to the precipice of death. He was so distraught, he tried repeatedly to commit suicide, but was too big a coward to pull it off. He had been demon-possessed, but then abandoned by Satan, so that he was incessantly mocked as the mute messenger. So he pilfered surrottens from Arab converts to Judaism and then from the Jews themselves, but his corruptions of their stories were so feeble he was labeled a fraud. And it had all ended very badly, with him crashing and burning after his ill-advised flight on the fabulous Donk-Mule to the nonexistent Al-Aqsa Mosque.
As these embarrassing memories returned, the non-prophet got cold feet. He lost his faith. He knew that when compared to the Quraysh, he was the loser. The camel balked because its rider was afraid.
And there was also the issue of the Ka’aba, Inc. Sure, he coveted it, but it was of no value without the Quraysh who had nurtured the scam. And he realized that if he became known as the man who murdered his own family, it would undermine the acclaim he sought.
This known, before we proceed with this story and pursue the bigger issues, there are some details here that ought not be missed. First, the Quraysh were peacemakers, not the aggressors. This is reminiscent of how they had attempted to appease Muhammad and the emerging religion 112of Islam eight years ago when he had threatened to slaughter them. Their response was the Idolatrous Indulgence, where they bribed Muhammad to renounce his religion – just as they were doing on this day. They knew him, and were, therefore, aware that he would sacrifice anyone and anything to satiate his desires.
Second, they negotiated, which was in opposition to Islam | Submission and the mandates to surrender, prostrate, pay, and obey. Moreover, the Quran expressly disallows alliances of any kind with non-Muslims, so Muhammad was in defiance of Allah’s commands.
Third, after 18 years of Quran recitals, no one had bothered to write any of it down. So the Quran was not as important as the capitulation of the religion at Hudaybiyah. That is such a debilitating and discrediting confession that it became the byline of this, the Jihad volume of God Damn Religion: Rivers of Blood ~ Not a Drop of Ink.
Fourth, the reason Umar asked what would otherwise be rhetorical questions is that Muhammad was willing to renounce his claim to being the Messenger of Allah to avoid being rejected in front of those he despised. And since his depleted pocketbook and fragile ego were more important to him than the Quran recitals, or his status as his god’s best and last prophet, an informed and rational person would also disavow those claims – ending Islam. And that is why this is an autopsy – a postmortem examination of the lifeless corpse of Islam.
Fifth, the “Are we not Muslims?” and “Are they not the polytheists?” questions reveal that Muslims were best known for slaughtering, looting, and abducting non-Muslims and that on this day, they were being prevented from doing so by the very man who had defined the religion in these terms. By extrapolation, Umar’s questions lead to the inevitable conclusion that negotiating with or attempting to appease Muslims results in more carnage, not less. 113Muslims will never cease being Muslims, which means that they will do what they were temporarily prevented from accomplishing at Hudaybiyah – killing, plundering, and abducting non-Muslims. If you want verification, consider how the Oslo Accords (signed two days before Yowm Taruw’ah in 1993) with Muslims led to the slaughtering, plundering, and abducting of Jews on October 7th, 2023. And then ponder the inevitability of the so-called “Two-State Solution” becoming the catalyst for the next world war.
Sixth, Muhammad was granting what was demeaning to the religion of Islam. By disavowing what he had claimed over the past 18 years, he was eviscerating the Quran and demeaning his status. If he were to do either today, Muslims would riot and kill him.
Seventh, as is the nature of this religion, even after a century of thinking about these events, Muslims simply cannot present a story chronologically to save their lives. While it is easy to assess what Muhammad had done to capitulate on Islam, himself, Allah, Muslims, and the Quran, we haven’t yet been told the reasons behind Umar’s outburst. Also, while every Muslim is aware of Hudaybiyah, and that their leaders can renounce whatever promises they have negotiated with non-Muslims, Muhammad’s dishonest example is explained in the Hadith and then justified in the Quran – requiring both to make sense of this disgusting episode. In fact, in a speech commemorating his ploy, Yasser Arafat of the PLO, compared the Oslo Accords to the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah, which would be broken when it served Islamic interests.
Not satisfied with Abu Bakr’s simplistic response to his questions: Ishaq:504 “Umar jumped up and went to the Prophet. ‘Are you not the Messenger of Allah?’ ‘Yes,’ Muhammad replied. ‘Are we not Muslims?’ Umar asked the Prophet. ‘Yes.’ ‘Are they not polytheists?’ Umar questioned. ‘Yes,’ Muhammad said. ‘Then why should we grant what is detrimental to our religion?’ He replied, ‘I 114am Allah’s Messenger. I will not disobey and He will not allow me to perish.’”
The initial answer was true enough, although not good. He was “Allah’s Messenger,” but unfortunately, Allah is Satan pretending to be God. So, Muhammad was working for the wrong boss. As for the next two claims, not so much. The non-prophet was disobeying Allah’s repetitive insistence that Muslims never form an alliance with non-Muslims, recognizing that those who do cease to be Muslims and are relegated to the fires of Hell. Further, Muhammad would die a horrible death. Allah was always more adept at getting Muslims killed while killing for him than he was at preserving lives. Within a few years, the terrible tyrant would be worm food. Allah couldn’t, and therefore didn’t, save him. And since he didn’t spare the Devil’s Advocate, what do you suppose is the fate of run-of-the-mill murderous jihadists?
Those words still lingering on his lips, Muhammad’s mouth denied his gods and his calling… Ishaq:504 & Tabari VIII:85 “The Prophet summoned me and said, ‘Write: “In the name of Allah, Ar-Rahman, and Ar-Rahim.”’ Suhayl said, ‘I do not know Ar-Rahman or Ar-Rahim. Should I write rather, “In Thy name, O Allah.”’ So Muhammad said, ‘Write: “In Thy name, O Allah.”’ And I wrote it.”
It’s interesting that this man, likely Suhayl, recognized the idol “Allah,” since he was among the gods venerated by the pagans in the Ka’aba’s pantheon, but this literate and acclaimed resident of KabaVille was unfamiliar with Muhammad’s initial two deities. This is because the prophet had borrowed Ar-Rahman and Ar-Rahim from the Yemeni Hanifs – Arab converts to Judaism – and didn’t start venerating al-Lahu until after the Idolatrous Indulgence and Satanic Verses.
This is immensely troubling for Islam because with this pronouncement we have affirmation of what has always been obvious. Rahman and Rahim were the names of the 115Quran’s initial deities, and not attributes as they are now assumed. Therefore, Islam was never monotheistic. It began with the Lord, identified as Ar-Rahman, and then added Ar-Rahim a decade before incorporating Manat, al-Uzza, al-Lat, and al-Lahu into the growing assemblage of pagan deities.
In addition, for the man tasked with committing Muhammad’s capitulation to writing to be unaware of Rahman and Rahim means that he did not hear Muhammad recite the initial Quran surahs which spoke of them and were named after them. If he had not heard them, who had? What was all the fuss and feathers about in the tiny enclave of KabaVille if there had been no Quran recitals?
It’s also interesting to note how quickly Muhammad was willing to abandon his first “gods.” Just a decade earlier, he had recited a Quran surah named in Ar-Rahman’s honor. It began: Quran 055.001 “Ar-Rahman bestowed the Quran, He created man, and He taught him speech and intelligence.” Apparently, the lesson was lost on Muhammad and his scribe.
Having abandoned his gods, the prophet was a breath away from disavowing his status as a faux prophet and demonic messenger... Ishaq:504 & Tabari VIII:85 “He said, ‘Write: “Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah, has made peace with Suhayl.”’ Suhayl said, ‘If I testified that you were the Messenger of Allah, I wouldn’t fight you. Why not write your name and the name of your father.’ So Muhammad said, ‘Write: “Muhammad bin Abdallah has made peace with Suhayl.””
That is all she – or he in this case – wrote for Islam. As Muhammad pounded the last nail in his religion’s coffin, it’s time to turn off the lights and bury this old coot.
But this question lingers: since Muslims are tasked with following Muhammad’s example, and now knowing that he denied being Allah’s Messenger, shouldn’t Muslims do the same? And should they do so, what is left of Islam other than to die killing for a deceptive man?
116This Hadith also confirms Muhammad’s capitulation: Bukhari:V4B53N408 “When the Prophet wanted to perform the Umrah, the Quraysh stipulated that he could not preach (Islam). So Ali started writing a treaty. ‘This is what Muhammad, Apostle of Allah, has agreed to.’ The (Meccans) said, ‘If we believed that you were the Apostle of Allah we would have followed you. So write, ‘This is what Muhammad bin Abdallah has agreed to.’ The Apostle could not write, so he asked Ali to erase the expression: ‘Apostle of Allah.’ On that Ali said, ‘I will never erase it.’ Muhammad said, ‘Let me see the paper.’ The Prophet erased the expression with his own hand.” This is Islam’s Death Certificate. Please read and display it.
There was nothing Muhammad wouldn’t forsake if the price was right. Nothing was sacred. But knowing that Allah’s lone messenger renounced his god and his witness, why does anyone trust him? Why believe anything he said – including his entirely self-serving Quran recitals when he didn’t even believe in himself?
Adding injury to insult, the former “Messenger of God” proceeded to renounce his methods. Tabari VIII:86 “They agreed to terms: warfare shall be laid aside for ten years, during which men can be safe and refrain from hostilities.” So now you know why Umar was having a conniption fit. This was a repudiation of everything Muhammad and Allah had said and done over the past 18 years. And for what – to obtain the custodianship of a rock pile devoted to rock idols and to avoid being compared to men far more credible than he?
So, what do you suppose the odds were that Muhammad would honor this agreement and endure ten days, much less ten years, without terrorizing, robbing, or abducting someone? I’d wager 1.9 billion souls to one.
The Hudaybiyah Armistice became even more hostile to Islam with these words… Tabari VIII:86 “During this time whoever comes to Muhammad from the Quraysh without the permission of his guardian, Muhammad shall return him to them; and whoever shall come to the Quraysh from those who are with Muhammad, they shall not return him to Muhammad. There shall be neither clandestine theft nor betrayal.”
117The relentless terrorist agreed to lay down his weapons – which was what the Quraysh wanted most of all. There would be no more attacks on their caravans. Anyone young enough to be fooled by the Islamic liars would be returned to their families. Yet the Quraysh were not similarly obliged. And betrayal and theft, the principal tools of terror, were being abandoned – or so Muhammad promised. The question was: could this man be trusted?
After completing the treaty of Hudaybiyah, Suhayl, the Quraysh scribe and negotiator, rose and said: Ishaq:504 “You shall go back, leaving us this year and not enter Mecca. When the next year comes, we will go out, and you shall enter Mecca with your companions and stay for three nights. Your swords must remain in scabbards. You shall not enter with other weapons.” The lesser pilgrimage of a thousand to a pagan shrine was jilted at the altar of complete capitulation.
The Islamic Godfather abdicated his authority. He renounced his god and religion, and then turned away from the dilapidated rock shrine that had been the inspiration for this sordid affair. It wasn’t Islam’s proudest moment. Although, I don’t know what was.
Bewildered, the Muslim barbarians crowded around their former non-prophet. They recognized that he had sold himself and them out. They had come to conquer and plunder, but it was all for naught. Islam had been a farce. The Never-Ending Argument was true – the only part of the Quran that proved accurate.
Tabari VIII:87 & Ishaq:505 “The Companions of the Prophet had set out not doubting that they would conquer, because of a vision Muhammad had seen. Therefore, when they saw the negotiations for peace, the retreat, and the obligations the Messenger agreed to, the Muslims felt so grieved about it that they were close to despair. Some were depressed to the point of death.”
There is nothing more deflating for a mercenary than peace negotiations. At that point, they are out of work and 118serve no purpose. And make no mistake – the first and best Muslims were mercenaries.
In these words, Muhammad was proven a false prophet yet again. He had seen a vision predicting conquest, shared it, and then it did not occur. Worse, Muhammad became an apostate by retreating in direct conflict with Allah’s orders. And as a former believer, and now as a peace advocate, the former Muslim was destined for Hell. This does not bode well for jihadists.
Seeking blood and booty, the deprived and depraved Muslim marauders and mercenaries were despondent. Nothing depresses a Muslim more than being told that they cannot slaughter and plunder disbelievers.
The harsh reality of what he had done came to haunt the Muslims. Tabari VIII:87 “While the Prophet was writing the document, Abu Jandal, the son of Suhayl, came in shackles. He had escaped to the Muslims. When Suhayl saw Jandal, he struck him and grabbed his garment. ‘Muhammad,’ he said, ‘the pact was ratified between me and you before he came to you.’ ‘You are right,’ he replied. Suhayl began dragging his son by his robe. Jandal began screaming at the top of his voice, ‘Muslims, shall I be returned to the polytheists so that they can entice me from my religion?’ This made the people feel even worse. The Messenger said, ‘Abu Jandal, count on a reward, for Allah will give you a way out. We have made a treaty, and we will not act treacherously toward them.’”
The terrorists were champing at the bit. Ishaq:505 “Umar jumped up, walking beside Jandal, and saying, ‘Be patient. They are only pagans, and the blood of any of them is no more than the blood of a dog!’ Umar held the hilt of his sword close to him. He said, ‘I hoped he would take the sword and kill his father with it.’ But Jandal was too attached to his father to kill him.” The ink had not yet dried on the only document written up to this point, and the future Caliph wanted a young recruit to murder his own father in refutation of it.
Tabari VIII:89 “When the Messenger had finished his pact, he said to his Companions, ‘Arise, sacrifice, and shave.’ Not a man stood 119even after he had said it three times. When no one stood up, went into Umm’s tent and told her what he had encountered from the Muslims. She said, ‘Do you approve of this? Go out, and speak not a word to any of them until you have slaughtered your fattened camel and summoned your shaver to shave you.’”
He did as she said. “When they saw this, they rose, slaughtered, and shaved until they almost killed each other in grief.” It was déjà vu all over again. Eighteen years prior to this occasion, and after the reclusive Abu Qasim has been scared spitless by the Lord of the dark cave and dimwitted recital, he cowered under the hem of Khadijah’s dress. It wasn’t until she told him to go out and act as if he were Allah’s messenger that he did as he was told.
If the bad boys of Islam didn’t get a terrorist fix in a hurry, there would be hell to pay. Muhammad needed to get his act together and his mercenaries under control, or it would all be for naught.
Tabari VIII:90 “Abu Basir was a Muslim confined in Mecca. He escaped and headed to Medina. There, the Prophet told Basir, ‘We have given these people our word. Breaking a promise is not right in our religion.’” But the Quran says: 066.002 “Lo, verily, al-Lahu has already ordained and sanctioned for you the dissolution of your oaths and vows.” Who was lying: prophet or god? Here’s a clue: Quran 002.106 “Whatever from signs or proofs, even verses We abolish and abrogate or We cause it to be forgotten, We bring better than it or similar to it. Do not you know that al-Laha over every thing all powerful?”
The answer was both. Demonstrating it, Muhammad didn’t return Abu in accordance with the treaty. Tabari VIII:90 “Abu Basir went out with his companions. When they stopped to rest he asked one of them, ‘Is this sword of yours sharp?’ ‘Yes,’ he replied. ‘May I look at it?’ Basir asked. ‘If you wish.’ Basir unsheathed the sword, attacked the man, and killed him. The other Muslim ran back to the Messenger, saying, ‘Your Companion has killed my friend.’ While the man was still there, Abu Basir appeared girded with the sword. He halted before Muhammad and said, ‘Messenger, your 120obligation has been discharged.’ The Prophet said, ‘Woe to his mother, the kindler of war’s fire.’”
Not returning Abu Basir to the Quraysh was Muhammad’s first violation of the Hudaybiyah treaty. Not condemning the murder and paying restitution was the second breach.
Ishaq:50 & Tabari VIII:91 “Abu Jandal, Suhayl’s son, escaped and joined Abu Basir. Nearly seventy Muslim men gathered around them and they harassed the Quraysh. Whenever they heard of a Meccan caravan setting out for Syria, they intercepted it, and killed everyone they could get a hold of. They tore every caravan to pieces and took the goods. The Quraysh, therefore, sent to the Prophet, imploring him for the sake of Allah and the bond of kinship to send word to them.”
Not returning Suhayl’s son was the third Muslim violation. Harassing the Quraysh was the fourth; raiding it was the fifth; killing and stealing were the sixth and seventh. Muhammad’s written testimony was no more reliable than his oral testimony. So, nothing was lost by not committing the Quran to writing during Muhammad’s lifetime.
Tabari VIII:91 “When word of how Abu Basir had killed his companion reached Suhayl, he leaned his back against the Ka’aba and said, ‘I will not move until they pay blood money for this man.’ By Allah,’ a Quraysh man said, ‘they will never pay.’”
Tabari VIII:92 “On that day Umar divorced two women who had been his wives in polytheism. Thus, he forbade them to send the women back, but commanded them to return the bride price. Then Mu’ayt emigrated to the Messenger. Her brother went to the Prophet and asked him to return her to them according to the treaty of Hudaybiyah. But he did not do so. Allah rejected it.”
Not only were these the eighth and ninth Muslim violations, there hadn’t been a breach attributed to the Quraysh. The merchants were honorable because it was the most important currency of their trade. Not so for the religious.
121So we must ask ourselves, why were these abuses chronicled in the Hadith? Did the Muslim sages believe that their prophet condoned deception, treachery, murder, thievery, and terror? Did they record Muhammad’s treachery in anticipation of future Muslims following the Rasuli’s deplorable example?
With the natives restless, Muhammad breached the treaty a tenth time as the ink was drying upon it. Tabari VIII:93 “According to Waqidi, in this month, the Messenger sent out Ukkashah with forty men to raid Ghamr. He traveled quickly, but the enemy became aware and fled. He sent out scouts and they captured a spy who guided them to some of their cattle. They took two hundred head back to Medina.” Once a pirate, always a pirate. If you bet in favor of Muhammad abstaining from terror for ten days, you lost – as did the world.
Earning a living, and actually producing something of value, was beyond the first Muslims. They stole everything and produced nothing. Muhammad and his Companions became bloodsucking parasites.
However, they weren’t particularly good parasites. Tabari VIII:93 “The Messenger sent out Muhammad Maslamah with ten men. The enemy lay in wait for them until he and his companions went to sleep. Before they suspected anything, the Muslims were killed; Muhammad escaped, wounded.”
Tabari VIII:93 “In this year, according to Waqidi, the Messenger dispatched the raiding party of Abu Ubaydah with forty men. They traveled through the night on foot and reached Qassah just before dawn. They raided the inhabitants, who escaped them by fleeing to the mountains. They took cattle, old clothes, and a man.” Muhammad’s hitmen were a less civil version of Hitler’s S.S.
Moving to the next Hadith in the religious book: Tabari VIII:93 “In this year a raiding party led by Zayd went to Jamum. He captured a Muzaynah woman named Halimah. She guided them to an encampment of the Banu Sulaym where they captured cattle, sheep, and prisoners. Among the captives was Halimah’s husband. When Zayd brought back what he had taken, the Prophet granted 122the woman and her husband their freedom.” This wasn’t compassionate terrorism. Muhammad liked her because she, like he, had betrayed and plundered her kin. By freeing the traitor, he would encourage more of the same.
Tabari VIII:94 “In this year a raiding party led by Zayd went to al-Is. During it, Abu As’b’s property was taken.” Tabari VIII:94 “A fifteen-man raiding party led by Zayd went to Taraf against the Banu Thalabah. The Bedouins fled, fearing that Allah’s Messenger had set out against them. Zayd took twenty camels from their herds. He was away four nights.”
In the midst of this fundamental Islamic terrorism, I want to insert a friendly reminder. I have not taken these raids out of context. I have not skipped over the “religious” references in an effort to slander Muhammad or disgrace Islam. There has been nothing but murder and mayhem. Islam, as chronicled in the Hadith and Quran, is a terrorist manifesto – a declaration of war and nothing more.
Tabari VIII:94 “In this year Umar married Jamilah. She bore him Asim; then Umar divorced her. Yazid married her after him, and she bore him Abd al-Rahman [a son named after the first pagan god of the Quran].” Perhaps that’s religious, because… Tabari VIII:95 “In this year a raiding party led by Abd al-Rahman bin Awf went to Dumat. The Messenger said to him, ‘If they obey you, marry the king’s daughter.’”
Disappointed by the lack of a score at Hudaybiyyah, Muhammad was making amends. The loot was flowing back into Islam’s coffers.
Tabari VIII:95 “In this year a raiding party led by Ali went to Fadak with a hundred men against a clan of the Banu Sa’d. This was because the Prophet had received information that a force of theirs intended to aid the Jews of Khaybar. Ali traveled toward them by night and lay in wait during the day. He captured a spy, who confessed to them that he had been sent to Khaybar to offer the people aid on condition that they would give them the date harvest of Khaybar.” This is the seventeenth Muslim violation of the treaty. But that was child’s play compared to the horror that was about to be unleashed on God’s people.
123In an effort to be accurate in our accounting, in each raid, Muhammad’s militants were the aggressors. They have not been depicted as defending themselves as Islamic apologists claim. They were heartless thugs doing what lost souls do – murdering and marauding. Even now, this township’s only crime was to offer to aid to the Jewish families the Muslims had banished from their homes in Yathrib with their date harvest.
Tabari VIII:96 “A raiding party led by Zayd set out against Umm in the [not so holy] month of Ramadan. During it, Umm suffered a cruel death. Zyad tied her legs with rope and then tied her between two camels until they split her in two. She was a very old woman.” If Islam gets any more peaceful, this book is going to start bleeding. That was horrific.
Tabari VIII:96 “Umm’s story is as follows. Allah’s Messenger sent Zayd to Wadi Qura where he encountered the Banu Fazarah. Some of his Companions were killed, and Zayd was carried away wounded. Ward was slain by the Banu Badr. When Zayd returned, he vowed that no washing should touch his head until he had raided the Fazarah. After he recovered, Muhammad sent him with an army against the Fazarah settlement. He met them in Qura and inflicted casualties on them and took Umm Qirfah prisoner. He also took one of Umm’s daughters and Abdallah bin Mas’adah prisoner.”
A pagan could not have been named “Slave-to-Allah” if Allah were not the name of a pagan god known to the Arab polytheists before Muhammad created Islam. And the reason I continue to harp on this point is that Allah was a minor-league rock idol, a two-bit stone tossed in amidst much more important gods and goddesses. Therefore, Muhammad was a liar, Islam is without merit, the Quran is rubbish, and jihad terrorism is nothing more than murder – a blight on the human race.
Tabari VIII:96 “Zyad bin Harithah ordered Qays to kill Umm, and he killed her cruelly. He tied each of her legs with a rope and tied the ropes to two camels, and they split her in two. Then they brought Umm’s daughter and Abdallah to the Messenger. Umm’s daughter belonged to Salamah who had captured her. Muhammad asked 124Salamah for her, and Salamah gave her to him.” This is agonizingly tragic. Muslims ripped an elderly woman’s legs and arms off of her body to torture her and then allowed Muhammad to rape her daughter. Yeah, Islam.
Yet the first Muslims enjoyed this story so much that they want to share another Hadith. Perhaps it’s less immoral and sadistic… Tabari VIII:97 “The Messenger appointed Abu Bakr as our commander, and we raided some of the Banu Fazarah. When we came near the watering place, Bakr ordered us to rest. After we prayed the dawn prayer, Bakr ordered us to launch the raid against them. We went down to the watering hole and there we killed some people. I saw women and children among them, who had almost outstripped us; so I sent an arrow between them and the mountain. When they saw the arrow they stopped, and I led them back to Abu Bakr. Among them was a woman of the Banu Fazarah. She was wearing a worn-out piece of leather. With her was her daughter, among the fairest of the Arabs. Abu Bakr gave me her daughter as booty.” Remember, this was Umm’s daughter, a woman whom the Muslims had brutally tortured and mutilated.
Tabari VIII:97 “When I returned to Medina, the Prophet met me in the market and said, ‘Salamah, how excellent the father who begot you! Give me the woman.’ I said, ‘Holy Prophet of Allah, I like her, and I have not uncovered her garment.’ Muhammad said nothing to me until the next day. He again met me in the market and said, ‘Salamah, give me the woman.’ I said, ‘Prophet, I have not uncovered her garment but she is yours.’ Muhammad sent her to Mecca, and with her he ransomed some Muslim captives who were in the hands of the Quraysh.”
The first Muslims had terrorized her town. Her property was stolen, her people were killed, her mother was mutilated, and now she was being traded as a piece of meat by the regime’s founder and the voice of the Quran.
Tabari VIII:98 “In this year a raiding party led by Kurz set out against the members of the Banu Uraynah with twenty horsemen.” I 125wonder if there was any village within reach of Muhammad’s Muslims that they did not plunder?
We close out the violent sixth year of the Islamic Era with some extraordinarily delusional diplomacy. Tabari VIII:98 “Between the truce of Hudaybiyah and his death, the Messenger dispersed some of his Companions to the kings of the Arabs and the foreigners to call them to Allah. He sent a letter to Ibn Shihab. The letter stated: ‘I have been sent as a mercy and for all. Therefore, convey the message from me, and Allah shall have mercy on you. Do not become disobedient to me as the Disciples became disobedient to Jesus. He called them to the like of what I called you to. Those whom he sent close by were pleased and accepted; those whom he sent far off were refused. Jesus complained of their behavior to Allah, and when they awoke the next morning, each could speak the language of the people to whom he had been sent. Then Jesus said, ‘This is an affair that Allah has determined for you; so go forth!’”
That was almost as delusional as the Donk-Mule flight to Jerusalem to meet with all of the Hebrew bigshots of yesteryear. Who knew that the mythical misnomer “Jesus” had disobedient Disciples or that Muhammad told “kings” not to be disobedient to him? The notion that he was a Muslim, was, of course, well-established in the Quran.
Keeping it real, these “letters” were neither written nor dispatched. Since the Quran had yet to find paper, and since Islamic diplomacy was conducted at sword point, this is a complete fabrication. After all, unlike Muhammad, leaders in the rest of the world were literate. They read, wrote, and spoke the dominant and enlightened languages of their day – Greek, Latin, and Aramaic. And they knew that there was no correlation between “Jesus” and “Allah.”
Tabari VIII:100 “The Messenger sent Hatib to Muqawqis, the ruler of Alexandria. Hatib delivered the letter of the Prophet, and Muqawqis gave Allah’s Apostle four slave girls. The Messenger sent 126Dihyah to Caesar who was Heraclius, the king of the Romans. When Dihyah brought him the letter, he looked into it and then placed it between his thighs and his flanks.”
There were no Caesars in the 7th century; the “Romans” were now Byzantines and ruled through the Catholic Church. Alexandria was not an independent city-state. No one named Muqawqis ruled in Egypt or Alexandria. It is actually a pejorative, suggesting that the last prefect of Egypt, Cyrus, who was the Greek Orthodox Patriarch, was an interloper from the Caucasus. As a Christian, he most certainly didn’t send “slave girls” to tantalize a false prophet. As for Emperor Heraclius, he was just concluding his successful campaign to rebuff the Persian invasion at Constantinople. By this time in 628 CE, he had pushed the Persians back into Mesopotamia, defeating them in the Battle of Nineveh in December 627 CE, which made them vulnerable to the marauding Muslims five years later. As for placing the letter between his thighs and flanks, lord only knows.
Back in KabaVille and among the Quraysh… Tabari VIII:100 “Abu Sufyan said, ‘We were merchants but the fighting between us and Muhammad has prevented us from journeying, so our wealth is depleted. [This is the purpose of terrorism.] Even after the truce with the Muslims, we fear that we still are not safe. [Muslims had continued to plunder Meccan caravans and had violated the treaty twenty times.] Nevertheless, I shall set out with a group of merchants for Gaza.’”
“Abu Sufyan said, ‘We arrived at the time of Heraclius’ victory over the Persians who were in his land. He expelled them and regained his Great Cross, which they had carried off. Having accomplished this, and having received word that his Cross had been rescued, he set out on foot to pray in Jerusalem. Carpets were spread before him and fragrant herbs were strewn in his path. When Heraclius arrived in Jerusalem, he performed his worship.”
Close, but not correct. The 6th year of the Islamic Era was 628 BCE and, by that time, the Sasanian War was over and there were no Persians in Byzantine lands. The “Great 127Cross” had been a religious fabrication because the Christian icon never resembled the method Romans used to crucify rebels. And even the pretense of it would have been destroyed when the Zoroastrians set the Church of the Holy Sepulcher ablaze. Heraclius was seriously injured fighting outside Nineveh, so he could not have walked to Jerusalem. And his glorious reception took place in Constantinople the previous year. Further, the road from Constantinople to Jerusalem, which had been destroyed during the conflict, was not restored until 630. And at this time, Jerusalem was in ruins and depopulated as a result of the war and Gaza was an abandoned wasteland. I share these historical facts so that you might recognize the fictitious nature of Islam. There is no excuse because this Hadith was written in Persia, where records of their triumph in Jerusalem would have been readily available.
And so, while the Islamic Tradition is wrong, nonetheless, the 25-year conflict between Byzantium and the Sasanians was so essential to Islam’s ability to burst out of Arabia following Muhammad’s death, that the story is worth telling. This is because the empires Muslims would soon assault were bereft of men and materials by 632, making the Islamic conquests possible.
By way of background, the Sasanian Empire of Persia / Iran recommended raiding and invading neighboring Byzantium in 602 CE, with the Persians winning almost every battle through 622 CE. They would conquer much of the Levant, Egypt, Anatolia, and the Greek islands. As for Emperor Heraclius, he ascended to the throne in 610 CE and, therefore, inherited the ongoing conflict, seeking to rebuff the invasion that rendered both empires exhausted after achieving nothing.
The Byzantine-Sasanian War of 602-628 CE was the most devastating of the battles between the contentious neighbors, with the previous 19-year (572-591 CE) conflict concluding just eleven years prior to this episode reigniting 128hostilities. The war was rekindled as a result of Byzantine Emperor Maurice’s assassination after helping the Sasanian king, Khosrow II, regain his throne. Mind you, the Christian support of the Zoroastrian monarch wasn’t an altruistic act between kindred spirits but, instead occurred because Khosrow vowed to cede northeastern Mesopotamia, Armenia, and Caucasian Iberia to the Byzantines and pledged that the Roman Catholics would no longer have to pay tribute to the Zoroastrians. As for Emperor Maurice, he was assassinated by his own military since he had cut army pay, resulting in successive mutinies, and then abandoned his troops, telling them to live off the land during the Balkan winter.
For a comparison, the commencement of this conflict between religious superpowers played out north, east, and west of the sweltering sands of Arabia in the civilized world eight years prior to Abu Qasim’s ill-fated rendezvous with Satan in the cave above Petra in 610 CE.
The final fight to the death between the Roman Catholics and Zoroastrians began in earnest when the Byzantine governor of Narses rebelled against Phocas, the centurion who had assassinated Maurice. When Phocas ordered the seizure of the Edessa region, Narses elicited the help of the newly restored Persian King Khosrow II, who was more than willing to avenge his father-in-law’s and benefactor’s death. And so, while the Byzantines were defeated at Dara in Upper Mesopotamia in 605 CE, during the conflict Narses escaped and attempted to return to Constantinople to make peace with Phocas. He was, however, seized and burnt alive.
With tensions simmering, in 608 CE, General Heraclius the Elder, the Exarch of Africa, revolted, proclaiming himself and his son by the same name, co-consuls. This fostered other rebellions in Byzantine Syria and Judea which Phocas repulsed. However, he was unable to stop Heraclius from claiming control over Egypt. Emboldened, the younger 129Heraclius built a fleet to attack Phocas at Constantinople, which prevailed when Phocas was handed over to the usurper and assassinated. Thereafter, Phocas’ brother was murdered, eliminating any threat to Emperor Heraclius II. However, with the treasury depleted by decades of war, Heraclius reduced the pay for his army and left his flank open to attack.
The Persians capitalized on the Byzantine civil war by reclaiming Armenia and Upper Mesopotamia. Then in 608, the Iranians reached Chalcedon, across the Bosphorus Strait from Constantinople. Heraclius tried to make peace with his relentless foe but Khosrow rebuffed him.
Expecting “Jesus” to reappear to defend Edessa, the Roman Catholics were disappointed and lost to the Zoroastrians in 610 CE – the year Muhammad was tormented by the demonic spirit – initiating the first of the Quran recitals. All the while, the Persians were on the march and would soon burn Caesarea. Unable to find a competent general, Heraclius took command of his troops, but not soon enough to turn the tide of the war.
Then during the years that the non-prophet was being ignored by his un-god, and while he was losing the Never-Ending Argument with his estranged family, King Khosrow attacked and prevailed in Syria, removing Antioch and then Tarsus from Christian control. The defeat severed the Byzantine Empire, leaving Judea and Egypt isolated and vulnerable. Damascus fell to the Zoroastrian king in 613 CE and Jerusalem in 614 CE. While records are sparse, ancient sources claim that 60,000 Jews and Christians were slain, with half that number taken to Persia as slaves. Less than 100 miles north of Petra, the Church of the Holy Sepulcher was burned, along with the pretense of religious relics, including the “True Cross” and the “Holy Lance,” even the “Holy Sponge.”
130And while the Zoroastrians were responsible, the Roman Catholics blamed the Jews for the embarrassing loss of their religious icons. This means that the Hadith’s claim regarding the rescue of the “Great Cross” and its return was exaggerated at best – while also devastating because the Quran insists that Isea / Jesus wasn’t crucified. And this becomes even more incriminating because it was around 618 CE that Muhammad claimed that he had jumped aboard Allah’s Donk-Mule to fly to the torched city with burnt shrines that was now under Zoroastrian control, making his fable all the more ludicrous.
That same year, in 618 CE, the Persians entered Egypt, where, apart from Alexandria, they met minimal resistance. This all transpired four years prior to Muhammad’s migration from non-prophet in Petra to terrorist in Yathrib. And since we are surveying the history of what was occurring all around Muhammad, and since we were prompted into this review of these events as a result of the non-prophet’s fanciful letter to “Caesar Heraclius,” I find it interesting that Khosrow wrote the following letter to Heraclius while an illiterate Muhammad was losing the Never-Ending Argument in Petra.
“Khosrow, greatest of Gods, and master of the Earth, to Heraclius, his vile and insensate slave. Why do you still refuse to submit to our rule, and call yourself a king? Have I not destroyed the Greeks? You say that you trust in your God. Why has he not delivered out of my hand Caesarea, Jerusalem, and Alexandria? And shall I not also destroy Constantinople? But I will pardon your faults if you submit to me, and come hither with your wife and children; and I will give you lands, vineyards, and olive groves, and look upon you with a kindly aspect. Do not deceive yourself with vain hope in that Christ, who was not able to save himself from the Jews, who killed him by nailing him to a cross. Even if you take refuge in the depths of the sea, I will stretch out my hand and take you, whether you will or no.”
131The Roman Catholic emperor was, indeed, ready to capitulate and allow the Byzantine Empire to become a Persian client state, openly declaring that Khosrow could choose his regent. But the Zoroastrians weren’t done toying with the Christians, and in a colossal miscalculation, took Chalcedon, such that they were staring down the walls of Constantinople. Soon thereafter, in the year of the Hijrah, Anatolia fell, along with Rhodes in 622 CE.
Heraclius was vulnerable because he was bankrupt. He even devalued his currency and started minting copper coins because he ran out of silver. Thereafter, a deadly plague spread across his empire. Undaunted, and acting like Muhammad, Heraclius increased taxation, compelled loans, and imposed punitive fines to finance his war machine. He committed incest with his niece. And then he announced that it was the duty of all Christian men to fight and spend in his cause. He bribed them with grants of land and heavenly rewards. Heraclius even decided to personally lead his raids against the polytheists.
In 622 CE, while Muhammad was exiling Jews from Yathrib with his gang of goons, Heraclius mounted his counter-offensive, doing so the day after Easter Sunday. His first victory came after marching through Cappadocia to Galatia and into eastern Anatolia where he feigned retreat and then ambushed the pagans.
With Heraclius chasing after the Zoroastrians, the Avars and Slavs captured Byzantine cities throughout the Balkans, including Belgrade and Sofia, then destroyed Salona in 614 CE. All the while a smattering of ill-mannered Muslims lost their skirmish against the merchants at Uhud.
Then the Slavs took Greece while the Avars raided Thrace, threatening Catholic commerce and agriculture. Their only surviving outpost was Thessalonica. Unable to fight on two fronts, the Christian emperor capitulated to the Avars, paying them an onerous tribute, sacrificing tens of 132thousands of peasants, and even offering both of his stepsons as collateral.
Now able to battle the Zoroastrians, Heraclius marched 20,000 men through Azerbaijan and crossed the Araxes River to destroy Dvin, the capital of Persian Armenia. Outnumbered two to one, the Christian king met his Zoroastrian counterpart at Ganzaka, where with the help of pagan Arabs, he ambushed and killed some of Khosrow’s guards, which led to the temporary collapse of the Persian army. Thereupon, the Roman Catholics destroyed Adur Gushnasp, the famous Zoroastrian Fire Temple at Takht-i-Suleiman. In the process, he inspired the 8th surahs which boasts that a single Muslim would defeat a hundred pagans, because Heraclius claimed, “Do not let the number of our enemies disturb you, for, God willing, one will pursue ten thousand.”
Adding additional fodder for the strategies Muhammad would deploy, Heraclius sent two soldiers feigning desertion to the Persians. The thought of easy victory spurred competing generals to rush out to glory in the slaughter of the Christians, only to be ambushed by them. In the process, the Christians confiscated the pagan baggage train. Then following a surprise night attack on the Zoroastrian camp in February 625, the Persian general lost his harem, underwear, and men, fleeing into the darkness naked and afraid. This same year, Muhammad, after a draw at the Battle of the Trench, perpetrated genocide on the last remaining Jewish community in Yathrib.
Following the attack, Heraclius wintered his men at Lake Van, which was the site of the Garden of Eden. Thereafter, he marched past Ararat along the Arsanias River to capture Persian outposts along the Tigris. But then in a copycat move, the Zoroastrians lured the Christian army across a bridge by feigning retreat, only to ambush and destroy a vanguard of Heraclius’ army. But damn the arrows, Heraclius charged across with his rearguard and turned the 133battle against the Persians. If nothing else, the behemoths of the day were beating each other to death.
Knowing that he was now in trouble, in 626 CE, as Muhammad was capitulating to the merchants of KabaVille, Khosrow rallied a new army of the remaining able men and mercenaries to defend the Persian heartland while a smaller force evaded Heraclius and headed to Constantinople. Simultaneously, the Persian king convinced the Avars to launch a coordinated attack on the Christian capital. The Persian expeditionary force was, however, unable to cross the Bosphorus, leaving their ally alone in the siege which began on the 29th of June 626. With the benefit of stout walls, 12,000 Byzantine troops defended the city against 80,000 Avars and Slavs. Although to be fair, the Virgin Mary was fighting along with the Roman Catholics. The Patriarch of the Church led processions along the walls with an effigy of the supposed Mother of God and Queen of Heaven, telling the Christians that they were under her protection.
Like the Quraysh at the Trench, the collective might of Persians, Slavs, and Avars were no match for the Bosphorus. They relinquished the siege and returned home. And then as if inspiring the Muslims, the Eastern Orthodox Christians wrote this little ditty in honor of the Virgin Mary and her victory dance over the pagans…
“Queen of the Heavenly Host, Defender of our souls, we thy servants offer to thee songs of victory and thanksgiving, for thou, O Mother of God, hast delivered us from dangers. But as thou hast invincible power, free us from conflicts of all kinds that we may cry to thee: Rejoice, Virgin Bride!
An Archangel was sent from Heaven to say to the Mother of God: Rejoice! And seeing Thee, O Lord, taking bodily form, he was amazed and with his bodiless voice he stood crying to her such things as these: Rejoice, thou through whom joy will flash forth! Rejoice, thou through 134whom the curse will cease! Rejoice, revival of fallen Adam! Rejoice, redemption of the tears of Eve!
Rejoice, height hard to climb for human thoughts! Rejoice, depth hard to contemplate even for the eyes of Angels! Rejoice, thou who art the King's throne!
Rejoice, thou who bearest Him Who bears all! Rejoice, star that causest the Sun to appear! Rejoice, womb of the divine incarnation! Rejoice, thou through whom creation becomes new! Rejoice, thou through whom the Creator becomes a babe! Rejoice, virgin bride!” This Christian Surrotten is called the Akathist, and it is chanted on the holiest occasions.
With the reincarnation of Asherah venerated as the Star who caused the Sun to appear, with the womb of the divine incarnation renewing creation, and with archangels amazed by the bodiless voice flashing forth as the Queen of the Heavenly Host and Mother of God with invincible power to redeem the tears of Eve, one should not be surprised that Khosrow’s army switched sides after a letter was ‘intercepted’ claiming the king intended to kill his general. Finding their sweet tooth, the Christian emperor was able to lure the Turks and Khazars to his side with inducements in this life and the next, such that they enhanced his ranks with an additional 50,000 soldiers. And they, along with some clever trebuchets were able to breach the walls of Tbilisi.
Unfortunately, the Virgin Mary grew weary and took a nap in the fall of 627, such that the menacing conditions became too much for the 75,000 troops under the Christian emperor’s command to endure and many deserted him. But with the true believers, he managed to raid the Persian army’s supply line and starve the Zoroastrians. The beleaguered foes met for the last time around the ruins of Nineveh. It had been the ancient capital of the Assyrians who had destroyed the Northern Kingdom of Israel, hauling ten 135of the twelve tribes into slavery, fourteen centuries prior to this day.
Fog enveloped the battlefield on this, the 12th day of December, 627 CE. With the Zoroastrian archers shooting blindly, Heraclius played his most predictable trick and feigned retreat, luring the unsuspecting Persians off of the high ground and into the lowlands, such that when the Christians turned on them, 6,000 pagans met Christ’s swords and fell after eight hours of hand-to-hand fighting. When the Persians finally regrouped, their general challenged Heraclius to personal combat, which legend says the Christian emperor won with a single thrust. Two Zoroastrian challengers followed, both losing, but not without seriously the emperor. Had Muhammad not been an obese wimp unable to wield a sword, it would have been reminiscent of the non-prophet’s facial lacerations and broken tooth at Uhud as his own men died around him.
With Christians acting like Muslims, Heraclius’ army plundered Dastagrid, finding vast treasures in Khosrow’s castle. What was left of the king’s army, knowing they wouldn’t be paid now that the Christians had plundered the Zoroastrian bankroll, turned on him. They hailed his son, Kavad, and king in his stead. Then demonstrating that he had the character of Muhammad, Kavad threw his father in a dungeon where he was tortured to death by successive arrows shot into his body over five punitive days.
While we aren’t told how the Christian emperor came upon the miraculous religious relics that had been incinerated in the fires destroying the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem fourteen years prior, the True Cross and Holy Sponge were resurrected and accompanied the Christians back to Constantinople where Heraclius was heralded as a saint. But there was no reason to rejoice because, in the end, the last remaining super-powers had crippled and bankrupted each other. Neither empire was able 136to pay their troops, and without them they could not extract tribute, such that they continued to wither and die.
With the battlefield surrounding Arabia in ruins, with armies decimated, with famine rampant, neither Christians nor Zoroastrians were prepared for the onslaught of Arab mujahideen emboldened by Islam and inspired by booty. The Byzantines and Persians had opened the floodgates through which a sub-human tsunami rushed through, cascading on rivers of blood. Soon, everyone from Persia to Northwestern Africa was swallowed in death as the Islamic religion revealed what Muhammad, Allah, and their Quran and Hadith had done to turn men into savages. But now, we are getting slightly ahead of our story.
Returning to the Hadith attesting to the spurious mission of the Quraysh leader, we find a long Tradition with a distinguished isnad, regaling fanciful stories proclaiming Muhammad’s importance. While fictitious, they are entertaining…
Tabari VIII:101 “King Heraclius arose troubled as he was shown in a dream that the kingdom of circumcision would be victorious. ‘O King,’ his Roman commanders said, ‘the only nation that practices circumcision is the Jews [wrong again, on both counts], and they are under your authority. Send orders to have every Jew beheaded and be rid of this care.’
As they were debating this proposal, a messenger from the ruler of Busra [a tribal kingdom in Bostra, Syria] arrived with an Arab. ‘O King, an Arab man from the people of sheep and camels reported something marvelous that has happened in his land.’ The Arab said, ‘A man has appeared among us claiming to be a prophet. Some believe him and follow him and some oppose him. There have been bloody battles in many places.’ Heraclius listened to his report and said, ‘Strip him!’ And behold, he was circumcised.”
With evil images swirling in their heads, the Islamic sages in Persia who composed this fable were a day late and many Jews short of another genocide. The Romans under Vespasian and Titus and then Hadrian had decimated the 137Jews of Judea in 70 CE and then again in 133 CE. And now we are aware that some 90,000 Jews were assassinated or enslaved by the Zoroastrian Persians in 618 CE. Further, the last remaining community of Jews within the region was on the cusp of being decapitated by Muslims during their raid on Khabar.
As we have just discovered, the events pursuant to Heraclius’ life were copiously documented by literate Christians. And since this dream was omitted from their histories, and since the Byzantines remained unaware of the lurking Islamic threat until it was too late, it would be a fool’s folly to regale this Hadith as reliable.
Nonetheless, we are told that Heraclius continued his interrogation. Tabari VIII:102 “Tell me about this man and his claims.’” Since the Hadith began in first person with Abu Sufyan speaking, I assume he is the one answering. “I began minimizing his importance to him and disparaging him. ‘O king, don’t worry about him. He’s too small to bother you.’ The king asked, ‘What is his lineage?’ I said, ‘Pure, the best of us in lineage.’ [Mind you, this was Muhammad’s arch enemy and the Quraysh couldn’t have known since illiterate people can’t maintain genealogies back more than a handful of generations.] He asked, ‘Has anyone from his family ever said the like of what he says, so that he would be imitating him?’ ‘No,’ I said.” Fortunately, we know better. Muhammad started by parroting the dogma Qusayy had established. Then he plagiarized Zayd, the Hanif poet, before he stole Moses’ material from the Towrah. And of course, the Quran itself contradicts this claim by falsely positing the notion that it confirms the Towrah.
Tabari VIII:102 “King Heraclius asked, ‘Did he have authority among you, of which you then stripped him, so that he brought this discourse in order that you might restore his authority?’ ‘No,’ I said.” Actually, that query hit pretty close to home. Muhammad believed the “authority” of the Ka’aba had been “stripped” from him at birth and this whole “discourse” has been about getting it back.
138Tabari VIII:102 “The king asked, ‘Tell me about his followers.’ I said, ‘The weak, poor, young boys, and women. As for those of his people who have years and honor, none has followed him.’” While that’s a lie, it is interesting. Abu Bakr was rich, as were Umar and Uthman. However, “poor, young boys” continue to find the promise of booty and lust alluring.
Tabari VIII:102 “‘Do his followers love him?’ Heraclius asked. ‘No man has followed him and then abandoned him.’” Whoever wrote this Tradition ought to have read the Quran before scribbling such nonsense. The last ten surahs have been fixated on Muslim hypocrites abandoning the non-prophet and Islam like rats on a sinking ship.
Tabari VIII:103 “‘Tell me,’ the king said, ‘how the war between you and him is going.’ I replied, ‘Sometimes it’s his luck to prevail against us, and sometimes our luck to prevail against him.’ ‘Does he act treacherously?’ I found nothing in what he asked me about him in which I could impugn Muhammad’s character except to say, ‘No. We are in a state of truce with him, and yet we fear he may act treacherously.’” I suppose the fifty terrorist raids the non-prophet had instigated thus far were all in good fun. The murders and mutilations at Badr must have been righteous. The decapitation and enslavement of the last Jewish community in Yathrib were exercises in nobility. And what of the Quran, and the Never-Ending Argument against Muhammad, calling him a demon-possessed fraud? Even the recently signed Treaty of Hudaybiyyah demanded that the defrocked former messenger forego treachery.
Tabari VIII:103 “Heraclius said, ‘If you have told me the truth then he shall surely wrest this very ground from under me. I only wish I were with him so that I could wash his feet.’” Having this Christian king say that he wanted to serve Muhammad by “washing his feet” is reminiscent of the monk confirming his prophetic calling years earlier. Being a fraud, the only means Muhammad had to authenticate his god and his calling was to fabricate fictitious endorsements.
139Tabari VIII:104 “Heraclius received the following letter from the Messenger. ‘In the name of Allah, Ar-Rahman, Ar-Rahim. From Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah, to Heraclius, the ruler of the Romans. Peace to whoever follows the right guidance! To proceed; Submit yourself, and you shall be safe.’” Muhammad’s idea of “peace” is the same as the Islamic world’s today: “Surrender and become a Muslim and we will tax, deceive, and oppress you, but not kill you. Obey and you will have peace.” If not, we kill you.
Ever desperate for nonexistent confirmation in the Towrah, we find another iteration of “he’s the one mentioned, but we don’t know where.” Tabari VIII:105 “Al-Zuhri said, ‘A Christian bishop whom I met in the time of Abd al-Milik [a Umayyad Caliph who ruled from 685 to 705] told me that he was acquainted with an affair involving the Messenger, Heraclius and his intelligence. According to the bishop, when Heraclius received the letter from Muhammad, he wrote to a man in Rome who used to read from the Hebrew what they use to read, mentioning the affair of the man, describing him, and informing him of what he had received from him. The ruler of Rome wrote back to him; “He is indeed the prophet we have been awaiting. There is no doubt about it. Follow him, and believe him.”’”
The Quran plays this same losing hand. Allah and Muhammad insist that the Quran affirms the Towrah and that Muhammad is the star of the show when neither is valid. The Quran exists as a pathetic corruption of the Towrah 2,100 years after Yahowah’s witness was written and accurately maintained. And neither Allah nor Muhammad, Islam nor the Quran, are found within its pages. Islam is a lie from beginning to end, which is why Muslims must lie to pretend otherwise.
Even in this, the Muslims got their presupposition wrong. By this time, the Hebrew Towrah had been translated into Greek in Alexandria in 275 BCE and into Latin in 382 CE. In Persia, where this was written, the Targum was an Aramaic translation of the Tanakh, first appearing in the 1st century CE, 500 years prior to the fabled events of this day. 140There was also the Syriac Peshitta, which had been circulated throughout the region beginning in the 5th century CE.
At the time, Rome was in shambles, such that the Church was ruled out of Constantinople, which is where its scholars resided. Moreover, Hebrew sages no longer existed, which was the reason the rabbis in Babylon studied the Aramaic Targum. Five hundred years earlier, Hadrian burnt them alive with every copy he could find of the Torah doused in oil and then set ablaze around them.
And so, since Muslims must lie to make their non-prophet and un-god appear credible, it is obvious that they are not. For example… Tabari VIII:105 “Heraclius then gave orders to gather the commanders of the Romans for him in a palatial building and ordered its doors to be closed on them. He looked down on them from an upper chamber because he was mortally afraid of them. He said, ‘People of the Romans, I have received this man’s letter calling me to his religion. By Allah, he is indeed the prophet whom we have been awaiting and whom we find in our Books. Come, let us follow him and believe him, that our life in this world and the next may be secure.’ Without exception, they snorted angrily at him and hastened to the doors of the building.” Somewhere, sometime, someone may have contrived a less believable endorsement, but by Allah, it’s hard to imagine.
This feeble attempt at legitimizing Muhammad’s claim to have been foretold in the “Bible” continues with the Christian bishop and Byzantine king saying that he was mentioned by name and described in detail. They don’t say where, of course, because it isn’t true. Not a word can be found anywhere to corroborate this preposterous tale. The “Muhammad-was-foretold-and-described” is repeated a hundred times in the Quran and Sunnah, but never with any proof. No one has ever identified a single supportive verse. Even today, the best Muslim apologists can do is to falsely claim that the Dabarym / Deuteronomy 18 prophecy foretelling Dowd’s arrival, spoke of an Arab Muslim. But 141we have been over that turf before and not only proven otherwise, it’s actually the warning against false prophets that pertains to the likes of Muhammad.
The never-ending Tradition goes on to say: Tabari VIII:107 “‘Shall we be under the hands of the Arabs when we are mankind’s greatest kingdom, most numerous nation, and best land?’ Heraclius said, ‘Then let me give him tribute each year so that I can avert his vehemence and find rest from his warfare by means of money that I give to him.’ The Romans said, ‘Shall we concede to the Arabs our own humiliation and abasement by a tax that they take from us?’ The king said, ‘Then let me make peace with him on condition that I give him the land of Syria [Israel, Jordan, and Lebanon, included] and that he leave me with the land of al-Sha’m.’ They replied, ‘Shall we give him Syria when we know it to be the navel?’ Having refused him, Heraclius said, ‘You will be defeated.’ He offered a farewell salutation and galloped to Constantinople.” There is a zero percent possibility that this conversation occurred. Feeble fables such as this were used to uphold the deceptions comprising the Quran. It is as if endless streams of lies create an ocean of truth.
Muhammad’s letter to Amr in Negus serves as further confirmation that the prophet was as dumb as the Stone for whom he spoke… Tabari VIII:108 “In the name of Allah, Ar-Rahman, Ar-Rahim. From Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah, to the Negus, king of the Ethiopians. May you be at peace. I praise you to Allah, the King, the Most Holy, the Peace, the Watcher, and I bear witness that Jesus the son of Mary is the Spirit and Word of Allah, which He cast into the goodly and chaste Virgin Mary, so that she conceived Jesus; whom Allah created from His Spirit and breathed into him, even as He created Adam by His hand and breathed into him, I call you to Allah alone, Who has no partner, to continued obedience to Him, and that you follow me and believe in what has come to me; for I am the Messenger of Allah. I call you and your armies to Allah.”
Had the letter actually existed, the Ethiopians would have laughed themselves silly. They had a special affinity for Yahuwdym, since many shared common ancestries. They revered the Towrah and Prophets and would have 142known that Yahowah’s name appears throughout. They would have also recognized that God’s prophets were Yisra’elites, not Arabs. Further, with their affinity for the Yemenites across the narrow gulf, they would have known that Muhammad was a ruthless terrorist.
There were other nonexistent letters to Persia, Iran, and Iraq but they were repetitive and offered nothing new. Having delved deeply into the truth and delusions of the letter to Heraclius, we will skip the rest and return to the Quran in the next chapter. Muhammad would have to resurrect his religion yet again to salvage his reputation after his great capitulation. Fortunately for him and unfortunately for humankind, the first and subsequent Muslims were not very bright and the non-prophet has gotten away with murder.
